Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing Two Handbooks of Meta-Analysis: Review of Hunter & Schmidt, Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, and Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, and Rothstein, Introduction to Meta-Analysis

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis, Version 2. Englewood Cliffs: Biostat, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (in press). Computing effect sizes for meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

  • Bubany, S. T., & Hansen, J.-I. C. (2011). Birth cohort change in the vocational interests of female and male college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., Erwin, P. J., & Triola, M. M. (2010). Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 85, 1589–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Learning Research, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland

    Andreas Gegenfurtner

Authors
  1. Andreas Gegenfurtner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Gegenfurtner.

Additional information

Preparation of this article was funded by the Doctoral Programme for Multidisciplinary Research on Learning Environments (OPMON).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gegenfurtner, A. Comparing Two Handbooks of Meta-Analysis: Review of Hunter & Schmidt, Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, and Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, and Rothstein, Introduction to Meta-Analysis . Vocations and Learning 4, 169–174 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9057-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9057-6

Search

Navigation