Skip to main content
Log in

Employee Retention: Organisational and Personal Perspectives

Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this continuously changing contemporary economy, companies have to be able to anticipate technological innovations and to compete with other companies worldwide. This need makes important a company’s ability to evolve through its employees’ learning and through continuous development. Securing and retaining skilled employees plays an important role in this process, because employees’ knowledge and skills are central to companies’ ability to be economically competitive. Given that employee retention is very important for the functioning and competitiveness of a company, this study focuses on the organisational and personal factors that influence employee retention. A special interest is taken in employees’ learning, because this is seen as a retention supporting activity. A questionnaire was administered to 349 employees, and 11 employees were interviewed. The interviews are used to illustrate and contextualise the quantitative results. The results show a large positive contribution of appreciation and stimulation of the employee to employee retention. This result is consistent with findings of earlier research. However, the retention benefits arising from personal development offer new possibilities when attempting to enhance employee retention. This study also showed that individual differences influence employee retention. Leadership skills and seniority have a positive relationship with employee retention and the level of readiness and initiative regarding learning are negatively related to retention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman, Y. (1997). The high-potential fast-flying achiever: themes from the English language literature 1976–1995. Career Development International, 2(7), 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1983). Organizational commitment: individual and organizational influences. Work and Occupations: An International Sociological Journal, 10(2), 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, E. (2005). Managing human resources to improve employee retention. The Health Care Manager, 24(2), 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashaw, E. R., & Grant, S. E. (1994). Exploring the distinctive nature of work commitments: their relationships with personal characteristics, job performance and the propensity to leave. Journal of personal selling and sales management, 14(2), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & Nannus, B. (1985). Leaders. New York, NY: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernsen, P., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. (2009). Learning under pressure: Learning strategies, workplace climate, and leadership style in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 9(4), 358–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birt, M., Wallis, T., & Winternitz, G. (2004). Talent retention in a changing workplace: an investigation of variables considered important to South African talent. South African Journal of Business Management, 35(2), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwmans, M. (2006). Verhalen die ons motiveren. [Stories that motivate us.] Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/uploads/pdf_BROCHURE_68.pdf.

  • Burke, R., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2007). Human resource management: managerial efficacy in recruiting and retaining teachers. The Lamar University Electronic Journal of Student Research, 5, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K. (2009). Work-related identity in individual and social learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, J. (2000). Developing the global leaders of tomorrow. Human Resource Management, 39(2–3), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. M. (2007). Appreciative inquiry handbook: The first in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of change (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, F. (1998). Current issues in selecting high potentials. Human Resource Planning, 21(3), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: a meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, S., & Wright, D. (2001). Retaining employees—the fast track to commitment. Management Research News, 24(8), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, S. (1999). Keeping your valuable employees: Retention strategies for your organization’s most important resource. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2007). Using emotional intelligence to identify high potential: a metacompetency perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 749–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2008). Real high-potential careers: an empirical study into the perspectives of organisations and ‘‘High Potentials’’. Personnel Review, 37(1), 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echols, M. E. (2007). Learning’s role in talent management. Chief Learning Officer, 6(10), 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, T. M., Yang, B., & Bartlett, K. R. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2004). The race for talent: retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human Resource Planning, 27, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershwin, M. C. (1996). Workplace learning: reports of change from supervisors and learners. Workforce Skills: Newsletter of Educational Partnerships in Colorado, 6, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., & Durick, M. (1988). Predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in human service organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunz, H., & Gunz, S. (2007). Hired professional to hired gun: an identity theory approach to understanding the ethical behaviour of professionals in non-professional organizations. Human Relations, 60(6), 851–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: a progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., & Richey, G. (2001). Global supply chain management: the selection of globally competent managers. Journal of International Management, 7(1), 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R. E. (2005). HR managers as employee-retention specialists. Employment Relations Today, 32(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltrop, J. M. (1999). The quest for the best: human resource practices to attract and retain talent. European Management Journal, 17(4), 422–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom, M. (2002). Appreciative inquiry: Een positieve verandering? [Appreciative inquiry: A positive change?] Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://www.djehoty.com/Mariellescriptie/eindversie%20met.pdf.

  • Howard, F. (1997). Keeping the best: employee retention in the ‘90s. Journal of Property Management, 62(3), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, B., & Gould, K. E. (2000). Strategic planning for employee happiness: a business goal for human service organizations. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 105(5), 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hytter, A. (2007). Retention strategies in France and Sweden. The Irish Journal of Management, 28(1), 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliprasad, M. (2006). The human factor I: attracting, retaining, and motivating capable people. Cost Engineering, 48(6), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, N. M. (2006). Telecommunication industry in Malaysia: demographic effects on costumer expectations, performance, satisfaction and retention. Asia Pacific Business Review, 12(4), 437–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, G., & Kleiner, B. (2005). Nurse residency program: an effective tool for recruitment and retention. Journal of Health Care Finance, 31(3), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, M., & Eichinger, R. (2000). ‘‘High potentials’’ as high learners. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisinger, S. (2007, October). Job satisfaction: a key to engagement and retention. HR Magazine, 52(10), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P. M., & Morrow, P. C. (1980). A multidisciplinary model of voluntary employee turnover. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 17(3), 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepermans, R., Vloeberghs, D., & Perkisas, B. (2003). High potential identification policies: an empirical study among Belgian companies. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 660–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, R. (2008). Learning’s impact on talent flow. Chief Learning Officer, 7(4), 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowden, R. W. (2002). The relationship between workplace learning and job satisfaction in U.S. small to midsize businesses. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(4), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowden, R. W., & Conine, C. T. (2005). The impact of workplace learning on job satisfaction in small US commercial banks. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(4), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SD Worx. (2008). SD Worx brengt beweging op de Belgische arbeidsmarkt in kaart. [SD Worx makes a cartography of the movement on the Belgian labour market]. Retrieved October 3, 2008, from http://www.sd.be/site/website/be/nl/1000A/10Z00C/10000P_080505_400.htm?key=854e8a44-cf3c-43d8-8c91-4896debd824b.

  • Snipes, J. (2005). Identifying and cultivating high-potential employees. Chief Learning Officer Magazine, 1–6.

  • Stone, M., & Liyanearachchi, D. (2006). Managing retention, who does it well? Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 14, 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. L.-P., Kim, J. K., & Tang, D. S.-H. (2000). Does attitude towards money moderate the relationship between intrinsic job satisfaction and voluntary turnover? Human Relations, 53(2), 213–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. R. (2004). Retention leadership. T&D, 58(3), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analysis based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, C. (2001). Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Haar, D., & Hosking, D. M. (2004). Evaluating appreciative inquiry: a relational constructionist approach. Human Relations, 57(8), 1017–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheijen, L. (2005). Leren van managers in een kenniseconomie: MD volg je niet, je creëert het. [Learning of managers in a knowledge economy: You do not follow MD, you create it.] Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://www.vocap.be/members/download/activiteit%20MD%2020050628.ppt.

  • Visser, C. (2001). Succesvol verandermanagement door appreciative inquiry. [Successful change management through appreciative inquiry.] Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://m-cc.nl/succesvolverandermanagement.pdf.

  • Walker, J. W. (2001). Zero defections? Human Resource Planning, 24(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, W. (2006). The impact of increased employee retention on performance in a customer contact center. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 8(3), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Kyndt.

Appendix: Overview factor items and factor loadings

Appendix: Overview factor items and factor loadings

Factor items independent variables

Factor 1: Appreciation and Stimulation (explained variance 16.91%, α = .94)

5.

The executive staff try to understand the problems employees experience in their work.

6.

On the job I have sufficient opportunity to use my personal talents and use my initiative.

7.

The executive staff in this company seem to make an effort to be nice to the employees.

11.

At work there seems to be an honest interest in the things I’m doing outside of work.

12.

The executive staff in this company always appear to be ready to give advice about how I can learn something new.

14.

We can criticise the work regulations and our criticisms are heard.

19.

When reforms are implemented, it’s because somebody had a good idea which was implemented.

28.

My company gives me the opportunity to get training in subjects that interest me.

30.

My company stimulates me to think about where I stand and where I need to get to achieve the company goals.

31.

In this company they believe in me.

35.

In this company people can really choose what work they want to do.

36.

At work I am doing stimulates me to develop myself in things that I’m not yet very good at.

37.

The company motivates me to develop, if possible, my own work-related interests.

38.

In this company I have the opportunity to organise my work so that it fits the way I learn.

39.

For a large part, I determine how I work.

43.

There are lots of ways that I can choose to learn.

46.

Our ideas and interests are taken serious by executive staff.

48.

My company gives me the opportunity to specialise in my strengths.

49.

Most executives make an effort to get to know us.

51.

I have the feeling that I have to put my own ideas aside to meet the corporate strategy.

52.

In my job I have the opportunity to do something with my skills and knowledge.

53.

In my job I am stimulated to think about the skills that I am good at.

55.

We have a lot of freedom of choice when it comes to the tasks we have to do.

56.

My executive appreciates it when someone has a new way of looking at a problem.

Factor 2: Leadership Skills (explained variance 10.03%, α = .89)

1.

I can communicate, present and give a speech well.

8.

I can convince everyone of the correctness and necessity of the ideas and actions I propose and undertake.

9.

When doing my work I use my creativity and inventiveness.

15.

I think of feasible and concrete actions that are in accordance with my personal vision and goals.

20.

I can assign task to the right people in a clear manner.

22.

When I’m speaking in a group, I draw everyone’s full attention.

27.

I’m able to motivate others to do their tasks as well as possible.

33.

When I’m working in team, I easily take the lead.

34.

I know very well what my strong points are.

40.

I make good decisions, even when I’m under pressure.

42.

I find myself capable of taking on an executive function in this company.

44.

I have an executive function in this company.

50.

Others in this company see me as someone who takes the lead easily.

57.

When an unexpected situation occurs and people panic, I remain calm.

Factor 3: Pressure of Work (explained variance 6.59%, α = .88)

17.

The work pressure is too high here.

21.

I sometimes think that my job asks too many different things of me.

25.

The constant pressure of work—things that need to be done, deadlines and competition—make me tense and sometimes depressed.

26.

There is a lot of work to do.

41.

Within the company a lot of the time the focus is on my weaknesses.

54.

As an employee I am put under a lot of pressure.

Factor 4: Following Procedures (explained variance 6.10%, α = .81)

13.

When I do my work, I follow the instructions closely, even when they are not in line with my own ideas.

16.

When innovations are made, it is usually because management has decided on a corporate strategy and corporate goals and we then try to accomplish these goals as well as possible.

24.

In my job it is very important that I do what is expected of me as closely as possible.

32.

Usually when a problem occurs I rely on procedures that are dictated by the company.

45.

In this company, expectations are that I should spend a lot of time on learning.

47.

For most situations at work, procedures are enforced by the company.

Factor 5: Learning Attitude (explained variance 5.14%, α = .80)

2.

When I want to learn something that can be useful in the workplace, I take the initiative.

3.

To gain insight into a complex problem, I let my imagination run free, even when a solution does not seem to be close at hand.

4.

I love undertaking activities on my own initiative.

10.

Some subjects that arise during work are so interesting that I investigate them further, even when it is not necessary for my work.

18.

I love to accept complex and challenging tasks.

23.

If I get the chance to learn, I will definitely take it.

29.

I think it is important to learn throughout my life.

Factor loadings independent variables

 

Component

1

2

3

4

5

1.

 

,496

  

,402

2.

    

,422

3.

    

,483

4.

    

,487

5.

,604

    

6.

,656

    

7.

,417

    

8.

 

,478

   

9.

 

,465

   

10.

    

,628

11.

,432

    

12.

,641

    

13.

   

,616

 

14.

,576

    

15.

 

,424

   

16.

   

,554

 

17.

  

,786

  

18.

 

,479

  

,444

19.

,533

    

20.

 

,509

   

21.

  

,628

  

22.

 

,552

   

23.

    

,599

24.

   

,690

 

25.

  

,749

  

26.

  

,712

  

27.

 

,634

   

28.

,583

    

29.

    

,691

30.

,620

    

31.

,683

    

32.

   

,640

 

33.

 

,711

   

34.

 

,507

   

35.

,567

    

36.

,681

    

37.

,704

    

38.

,505

    

39.

,423

  

−,431

 

40.

 

,612

   

41.

  

,480

  

42.

 

,728

   

43.

,655

    

44.

 

,580

   

45.

   

,439

 

46.

,732

    

47.

   

,718

 

48.

,724

    

49.

,713

    

50.

 

,758

   

51.

−,480

    

52.

,669

    

53.

,742

    

54.

  

,816

  

55.

,555

    

56.

,554

    

57.

 

,427

   

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

Rotation converged in 6 iterations.

Values under .40 suppressed.

Factor items employee retention

Dependent factor: Employee retention (explained variance 49.13%, α = .91)

a.

I’m planning on working for another company within a period of three years.

b.

Within this company my work gives me satisfaction.

c.

If I wanted to do another job or function, I would look first at the possibilities within this company.

d.

I see a future for myself within this company.

e.

It doesn’t matter if I’m working for this company or another, as long as I have work.

f.

If it were up to me, I will definitely be working for this company for the next five years.

g.

If I could start over again, I would choose to work for another company.

h.

If I received an attractive job offer from another company, I would take the job.

i.

The work I’m doing is very important to me.

j.

I love working for this company.

k.

I have checked out a job in another company previously.

Factor loadings employee retention

 

Component

 

1

a.

,791

b.

,789

c.

,621

d.

,768

e.

,494

f.

,820

g.

,658

h.

,734

i.

,534

j.

,815

k.

,586

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

1 components extracted.

Values under .40 suppressed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Michielsen, M. et al. Employee Retention: Organisational and Personal Perspectives. Vocations and Learning 2, 195–215 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-009-9024-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-009-9024-7

Keywords

Navigation