Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase II randomized study evaluating azacitidine versus conventional care regimens in newly diagnosed elderly Japanese patients with unfavorable acute myeloid leukemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multicenter phase II study was conducted in 44 elderly (≥ 65 years) Japanese patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to evaluate whether azacitidine is also effective and feasible in Japanese AML patients. The 28 patients with AML with poor-risk cytogenetics and/or myelodysplasia-related changes (unfavorable AML) were randomly assigned to receive either azacitidine or conventional care regimens (CCR), and the other 16 patients without unfavorable AML received azacitidine alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival. At the median follow-up of 29 months, among the 26 evaluable patients with unfavorable AML, the median survival time (MST) of patients who received azacitidine (N = 14) was 9.6 months and that of patients who received CCR (N = 12) was 5.3 months (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.31–1.69; log-rank P = 0.459). The MST of all 29 patients who received azacytidine, including the 15 evaluable patients without unfavorable AML, was 12.4 months. Adverse events of azacitidine were manageable and consistent with its established safety profile. Azacitidine tended to prolong survival in newly diagnosed elderly Japanese patients with AML, and was feasible as a front-line therapy for elderly AML patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wakita A. Characteristics of the elderly patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. Jpn J Clin Med. 2009;67:1997–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dombret H, Raffoux E, Gardin C. Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly. Semin Oncol. 2008;35(4):430–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, Godwin JE, et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:3481–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology acute myeloid leukemia. Ver. 3. 2021.

  5. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:620–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Santini V, Gattermann N, Germing U, et al. Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:562–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Silverman LR, McKenzie DR, Peterson BL, Holland JF, Backstrom JT, Beach CL, et al. Further analysis of trials with azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: studies 8421, 8921, and 9221 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3895–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arber DA, Brunning RD, Le Beau MM, Butler D, Wolff DJ, Hasserijian RP, et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia and related precursor neoplasms. In: Swerdlow SH, et al., editors. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC; 2017. p. 129–71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, Wierzbowska A, Selleslag D, Jang JH, et al. International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood. 2015;126(3):291–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden T, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon R, Wittes RE, Ellenberg SS. Randomized phase II clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1375–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114:937–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Ver. 2. 2017.

  14. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Büchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(24):4642–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, Thirman MJ, Garcia JS, Wei AH, et al. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:617–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. The sponsors of the study were involved in the study design, data collection, statistical analysis, data interpretation, and medical writing. The authors wish to thank the study group, subinvestigators, study staff, and patients. The members of Study group: Kensuke Usuki, Department of Hematology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo. Kiyoshi Ando, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine. Takahiro Yamauchi, Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Fukui. Junya Kuroda, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. Takayuki Ishikawa, Department of Hematology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital. Hiromi Iwasaki, Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center. Takahiro Suzuki, Department of Hematology, Kitasato University School of Medicine. Kenichi Kitamura, Division of Hematology, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital. Hitoji Uchiyama, Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital. Satoshi Ichikawa, Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine. Kenji Imajo, Hematology and Oncology Center, Okayama City Hospital. Hitoshi Hanamoto, Department of Hematology, Kindai University Nara Hospital. Shuichi Miyawaki, Division of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital. Noriko Usui, Department of Clinical Oncology and Hematology, The Jikei University School of Medicine. Norio Asou, Department of Hematology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University. Akihiro Hirakawa, Department of Clinical Biostatistics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University. Kazutaka Kuriyama, Division of Clinical Laboratory, Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center. Masakazu Muta, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Hospital Organization Beppu Medical Center. Masafumi Taniwaki, Center for Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. Yukari Takahashi, Clinical Development Dept., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. Atsushi Dohi, Clinical Development Dept., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. Yoko Nakanishi, R&D Administration Dept., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. Ryuhei Nakaoka, Data Science Dept., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroatsu Iida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Azacitidine was provided by Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. IH reports all support for the present manuscript from Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd., grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and payment from Astellas Pharma Inc., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Novartis Pharma K.K., and Abbvie Inc. KI reports honoraria from Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. AY reports payments from Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. TK reports grants from Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. TU reports honoraria from Pfizer Japan Inc. YM reports research funding of this study from Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd., grants from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., and payments from Astellas Pharma Inc., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Abbvie Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Bristol-Myers-Squibb K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited., Sanofi K.K. and Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. TN reports grants from Astellas Pharma Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited. And FUJIFILM Corporation., payments from Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol-Myers-Squibb K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sysmex Corporation and Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. RO reports consulting fees from Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of the Study Group are listed in acknowledgements.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 320 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iida, H., Imada, K., Ueda, Y. et al. A phase II randomized study evaluating azacitidine versus conventional care regimens in newly diagnosed elderly Japanese patients with unfavorable acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Hematol 115, 694–703 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-022-03307-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-022-03307-x

Keywords

Navigation