Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pharmacokinetically guided, once-daily intravenous busulfan in combination with fludarabine for elderly AML/MDS patients as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of pharmacokinetically (PK) guided, once-daily administration of busulfan (BU) was evaluated in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Twenty-one patients (median age 61) received 30 mg/m2 fludarabine for 6 days and BU for 4 days, starting from 3.2 mg/m2 and subsequently adjusted to the target area under the curve (AUC) of 6000 µmol-min/L. The median AUC of day 1 (AUC1), AUC4, and their average were 4871.3, 6021.0, and 5368.1 µmol-min/L, respectively. Veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (VOD/SOS) occurred in five patients (24%) but all recovered well. Four patients (20%) had non-infectious pulmonary complications (NIPCs). Patients with high AUC1 had frequent gastrointestinal adverse events, but similar incidence of VOD/SOS and NIPCs. Two-year overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse rates were 44.4%, 28.6%, and 29.1%, respectively. Patients with high AUC1 had significantly high NRM (57.1% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.04) and inferior OS (14.3% vs. 60.1%, P = 0.002), while patients with high AUC4 had a significantly low relapse rate (8.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.02). In conclusion, once-daily BU and a PK-guided dose intensification were beneficial for reducing relapse in elderly patients with AML/MDS. However, caution should be exercised as rapid BU dose elevation may contribute to NRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russell JA, Kangarloo SB, Williamson T, Chaudhry MA, Savoie ML, Turner AR, et al. Establishing a target exposure for once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine and thymoglobulin before allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:1381–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson BS, Thall PF, Madden T, Couriel D, Wang X, Tran HT, et al. Busulfan systemic exposure relative to regimen-related toxicity and acute graft-versus-host disease: defining a therapeutic window for i.v. BuCy2 in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8:477–85.

  3. Geddes M, Kangarloo SB, Naveed F, Quinlan D, Chaudhry MA, Stewart D, et al. High busulfan exposure is associated with worse outcomes in a daily i.v. busulfan and fludarabine allogeneic transplant regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:220–8.

  4. Russell JA, Tran HT, Quinlan D, Chaudhry A, Duggan P, Brown C, et al. Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8:468–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryu SG, Lee JH, Choi SJ, Lee JH, Lee YS, Seol M, et al. Randomized comparison of four-times-daily versus once-daily intravenous busulfan in conditioning therapy for hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1095–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato M, Kako S, Matsumoto K, Oshima K, Akahoshi Y, Nakano H, et al. Pharmacokinetics study of once-daily intravenous busulfan in conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2015;101:497–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pidala J, Kim J, Anasetti C, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Field T, Perkins J, et al. Targeted i.v. BU and fludarabine (t-i.v. BU/Flu) provides effective control of AML in adults with reduced toxicity. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46:641–9.

  8. Andersson BS, Thall PF, Valdez BC, Milton DR, Al-Atrash G, Chen J, et al. Fludarabine with pharmacokinetically guided IV busulfan is superior to fixed-dose delivery in pretransplant conditioning of AML/MDS patients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52:580–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peris JE, Latorre JA, Castel V, Verdeguer A, Esteve S, Torres-Molina F. Determination of busulfan in human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with pre-column derivatization and fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1999;730:33–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura H, Sato T, Okada K, Miura G, Ariyoshi N, Nakazawa K, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan in young Japanese children before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30:75–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Fisher LD, Schoch HG, Wolford JL, Banaji M, et al. Veno-occlusive disease of the liver and multiorgan failure after bone marrow transplantation: a cohort study of 355 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:255–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones RJ, Lee KS, Beschorner WE, Vogel VG, Grochow LB, Braine HG, et al. Venoocclusive disease of the liver following bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation. 1987;44:778–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Armand P, Kim HT, Logan BR, Wang Z, Alyea EP, Kalaycio ME, et al. Validation and refinement of the Disease Risk Index for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2014;123:3664–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Slattery JT, Clift RA, Buckner CD, Radich J, Storer B, Bensinger WI, et al. Marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: the influence of plasma busulfan levels on the outcome of transplantation. Blood. 1997;89:3055–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yeh RF, Pawlikowski MA, Blough DK, McDonald GB, O’Donnell PV, Rezvani A, et al. Accurate targeting of daily intravenous busulfan with 8-hour blood sampling in hospitalized adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:265–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Perkins JB, Kim J, Anasetti C, Fernandez HF, Perez LE, Ayala E, et al. Maximally tolerated busulfan systemic exposure in combination with fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:1099–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. de Castro FA, Lanchote VL, Voltarelli JC, Colturato VA, Simoes BP. Influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan during pretransplant conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53:1205–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kikuchi T, Mori T, Ohwada C, Onoda M, Shimizu H, Yokoyama H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan as condition for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: comparison between combinations with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Int J Hematol. 2021;113:128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vassal G. Pharmacologically-guided dose adjustment of busulfan in high-dose chemotherapy regimens: rationale and pitfalls (review). Anticancer Res. 1994;14:2363–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCune JS, Bemer MJ, Barrett JS, Scott Baker K, Gamis AS, Holford NH. Busulfan in infant to adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic model for initial and Bayesian dose personalization. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:754–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen L, Leger F, Lennon S, Puozzo C. Intravenous busulfan in adults prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a population pharmacokinetic study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006;57:191–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beumer JH, Owzar K, Lewis LD, Jiang C, Holleran JL, Christner SM, et al. Effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation; an alliance study (CALGB 10503, 19808, and 100103). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:927–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallen H, Gooley TA, Deeg HJ, Pagel JM, Press OW, Appelbaum FR, et al. Ablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults 60 years of age and older. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3439–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Donnell PH, Artz AS, Undevia SD, Pai RK, Del Cerro P, Horowitz S, et al. Phase I study of dose-escalated busulfan with fludarabine and alemtuzumab as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: reduced clearance at high doses and occurrence of late sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51:2240–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yakushijin K, Atsuta Y, Doki N, Yokota A, Kanamori H, Miyamoto T, et al. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Incidence, risk factors and outcomes. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:403–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakaguchi H, Takahashi Y, Watanabe N, Doisaki S, Muramatsu H, Hama A, et al. Incidence, clinical features, and risk factors of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58:780–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Popat U, Mehta RS, Bassett R, Kongtim P, Chen J, Alousi AM, et al. Optimizing the Conditioning Regimen for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Myelofibrosis: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26:1439–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ben-Barouch S, Cohen O, Vidal L, Avivi I, Ram R. Busulfan fludarabine vs busulfan cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:232–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Weil E, Zook F, Oxencis C, Canadeo A, Urmanski A, Waggoner M, et al. Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of a Busulfan Test Dose in Adult Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23:952–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Beri R, Chunduri S, Sweiss K, Peace DJ, Mactal-Haaf C, Dobogai LC, et al. Reliability of a pretransplant i.v. BU test dose performed 2 weeks before myeloablative FluBu conditioning regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:249–53.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank our patients and their families who have shared their experiences with us, and Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikako Ohwada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohwada, C., Yamazaki, S., Shono, K. et al. Pharmacokinetically guided, once-daily intravenous busulfan in combination with fludarabine for elderly AML/MDS patients as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol 114, 664–673 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-021-03188-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-021-03188-6

Keywords

Navigation