Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative evaluation of reagents for measuring protein S activity: possibility of harmonization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with congenital protein S (PS) deficiency show a hereditary predisposition for thrombosis, and PS deficiency is prevalent among Japanese populations. Diagnosis is based on symptoms of thrombosis and reduced PS activity. Three reagents that use different measurement principles for determining PS activity are available in Japan. This study aimed to confirm the possibility of harmonization of these three reagents to establish a universal standard for PS activity in Japanese populations. Commercial normal plasma and plasma samples obtained from healthy individuals and healthy pregnant women were tested at three facilities using three reagents for measuring PS: STA-Staclot Protein S (STA-PS), HemosIL Protein S (Clotting) (IL-PS), and a total PS assay (SNT-PS). The within-run precision of each reagent was good, as each had a coefficient of variation of ≤ 3.8%. The dilution linearity for each reagent was also good. The correlation coefficient was 0.94 for STA-PS vs. IL-PS, 0.93 for SNT-PS vs. STA-PS, and 0.90 for SNT-PS vs. IL-PS, indicating a good correlation. Although the three reagents available in Japan for measuring PS activity use different measurement methods, each showed good performance, and large differences were not observed between the obtained values. Harmonization among them appears possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kinoshita S, Iida H, Inoue S, Watanabe K, Kurihara M, Wada Y, et al. Protein S and protein C gene mutations in Japanese deep vein thrombosis patients. Clin Biochem. 2005;38:908–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miyata T, Kimura R, Kokubo Y, Sakata T. Genetic risk factors for deep vein thrombosis among Japanese: importance of protein S K196E mutation. Int J Hematol. 2006;83:217–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kimura R, Honda S, Kawasaki T, Tsuji H, Madoiwa S, Sakata Y, et al. Protein S-K196E mutation as a genetic risk factor for deep vein thrombosis in Japanese patients. Blood. 2006;107:1737–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikejiri M, Wada H, Sakamoto Y, Ito N, Nishioka J, Nakatani K, et al. The association of protein S Tokushima-K196E with a risk of deep vein thrombosis. Int J Hematol. 2010;92:302–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hepner M, Karlaftis V. Protein S. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;992:373–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Faioni EM. Reliable estimates of plasma protein S levels: are we getting any closer? Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:1139–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marlar RA, Gausman JN. Protein S abnormalities: a diagnostic nightmare. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:418–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Adcock DM, Gosselin R, Kitchen S, Dwyre DM. The effect of dabigatran on select specialty coagulation assays. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139:102–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuma H, Matsuda R, Nakashima A, Motoyama K, Takazaki S, Hatae H, et al. Protein S-specific activity assay system is not affected by direct oral anticoagulants. Thromb Res. 2018;168:60–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brinkman HJ, Mertens K, van Mourik JA. Proteolytic cleavage of protein S during the hemostatic response. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:2712–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu D, Xie RL, Rydzewski A, Long GL. The effect of N-linked glycosylation on molecular weight, thrombin cleavage, and functional activity of human protein S. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77:1156–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dahlbäck B. Purification of human vitamin K-dependent protein S and its limited proteolysis by thrombin. Biochem J. 1983;209:837–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahlbäck B. Inhibition of protein Ca cofactor function of human and bovine protein S by C 4b-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:12022–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Walker FJ. Regulation of activated protein C by a new protein. A possible function for bovine protein S. J Biol Chem. 1980; 255:5521–4.

  15. Gierula M, Salles-Crawley II, Santamaria S, Teraz-Orosz A, Crawley JTB, Lane DA, et al. The roles of factor Va and protein S information of the activated protein C/protein S/factor Va inactivation complex. J Thromb Haemost. 2019;17:2056–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki A, Sanda N, Miyawaki Y, Fujimori Y, Yamada T, Takagi A, et al. Down-regulation of PROS1 gene expression by 17β-estradiol via estrogen receptor α (ERα)-Sp1 interaction recruiting receptor-interacting protein 140 and the corepressor-HDAC3 complex. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:13444–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Comp PC, Thurnau GR, Welsh J, Esmon CT. Functional and immunologic protein S levels are decreased during pregnancy. Blood. 1986;68:881–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Malm J, Laurell M, Dahlback B. Changes in the plasma levels of vitamin K-dependent proteins C and S and of C4b-binding protein during pregnancy and oral contraception. Br J Haematol. 1988;68:437–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tans G, Curvers J, Middeldorp S, Thomassen MC, Meijers JC, Prins MH, et al. A randomized cross-over study on the effects of levonorgestrel- and desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives on the anticoagulant pathways. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:15–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsuda T, Jin X, Tsuda H, Ieko M, Morishita E, Adachi T, et al. New quantitative total protein S-assay system for diagnosing protein S type II deficiency: clinical application of the screening system for protein S type II deficiency. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2012;23:56–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Noguchi K, Nakazono E, Tsuda T, Jin X, Sata S, Miya M, et al. Plasma phenotypes of protein S Lys196Glu and protein C Lys193del variants prevalent among young Japanese women. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2019;30:393–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hiroko Juraku and Kyoko Kumagai for helping with the PS activity measurements. We also thank Yayoi Ishida for the administrative support in writing the manuscript. The manuscript was proofread for language usage by Enago (www.enago.jp) before submission.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MI conceived the study, provided research guidance, and wrote the manuscript. EM, HT, and DK interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript. Data analysis was performed by MI, TH, and TA. Testing was done by SN, MY, TH, KW, and ST. Patient enrolment was done by KO, NT, and TA. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Ieko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Dentistry at the Health Sciences University of Hokkaido (No. 148 and 192) and the Medical Ethics Committee of the Aiiku Maternal and Child Health Center (No. 152).

Informed consent

All subjects provided informed consent before study participation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ieko, M., Hotta, T., Watanabe, K. et al. Comparative evaluation of reagents for measuring protein S activity: possibility of harmonization. Int J Hematol 113, 530–536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-03049-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-03049-8

Keywords

Navigation