Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening for M-proteinemia consisting of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma for 30 years among atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy (M-proteinemia) is a premalignant plasma cell disorder. The prevalence of M-proteinemia increases with age and is affected by genetic or environmental factors. Atomic bomb (A-bomb) survivors in Hiroshima are in an age range when they are susceptible to M-proteinemia. The prevalence and incidence of M-proteinemia in Hiroshima A-bomb survivors were investigated for 30 years (1989–2018) to examine the influence of radiation exposure. The overall prevalence of M-proteinemia among 38,602 A-bomb survivors was 2.4%. M-proteinemia prevalence at age 70 years and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) incidence were not associated with radiation exposure category. Males had a 2.30-fold higher prevalence and a 2.08-fold higher incidence than females. The risk of incidence for MGUS was 4.32-fold higher in persons aged < 10 years at the time of the A-bombing and 2.56-fold higher in those aged 10–19 years compared with those aged over 30 years. IgG type M-proteinemia was common and the IgM type developed 5–8 years later than other immunoglobulin types. Exposure to radiation was not clearly associated with the prevalence of M-proteinemia or incidence of MGUS in Hiroshima A-bomb survivors. However, males and those aged < 20 years at A-bombing had higher susceptibility to MGUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kyle RA, Durie BGM, Rajkumar SV, Landgren O, Blade J, Merlini G, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspective risk factor for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia. 2010;24:1121–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berenson JR, Anderson KC, Audell RA, Boccia RV, Coleman M, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a consensus statement. Brit J Haematol. 2010;150:28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009;113:5412–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss BM, Abadie J, Verma P, Howard RS, Kuehl WM. A monoclonal gammopathy precedes multiple myeloma in most patients. Blood. 2009;113:5418–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leung N, Bridoux F, Hutchison CA, Nasr SH, Cockwell P, Fermand J-P, et al. Monoclonal gammmopathy of renal significance: when MGUS is no longer undetermined or insignificant. Blood. 2012;120:4292–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyle RA, Kumar S. The significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Haematologica. 2009;94:1641–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wadhera RK, Rajkumar SV. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined sinificance: A systematic review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:933–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kato M, Simizu Y. Cancer mortality rates in A-bomb survivors. In: Sigematsu I, Ito C, Kamada N, Akiyama M, Sasaki H, (eds) Effects of A-bomb Radiation on Human Body. Harwood academic publishers. Switzerland. Ltd, Copyright 1995 by Bunkodo Co., Ltd. P. 26–39.

  9. Pasqualetti P, Collacciani A, Casale R. Risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A case-referent study. Amer J Hematol. 1996;52:217–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vachon CM, Kyle RA, Thermeau TM, Foreman BJ, Larson DR, Colby CL, et al. Increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy in first-degree relatives of patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2009;114:785–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Landgren O, Kristinsson SY, Goldin LR, Caporaso NE, Blimark C, Mellqvist UH, et al. Risk of plasma cell and lymphoproliferative disorders among 14621 first-degree relatives of 4458 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in Sweden. Blood. 2009;114:791–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuzick J. Radition-induced myelomatosis. N Engl. J Med. 1981;304:204–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iwanaga M, Tagawa M, Tsukasaki K, Kamihira S, Tomonaga M. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: Study of 52802 persons in Nagasaki city Japan. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1474–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Linet M. Myeloma aetiology and epidemiology. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56:223–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwanaga M, Tagawa M, Tsukasaki K, Matsuo T, Yokota K, Miyazki Y, et al. Relationship between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and radiation exposure in Nagasaki A-bomb survivors. Blood. 2009;113:1639–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Neriishi K, Nakashima E, Suzuki G. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significnance in A-bomb survivors: Incidence and transformation to multiple myeloma. Brit J Haematol. 2003;121:405–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown LM, Gridley G, Check D, Landgren O. Risk of multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among white and black male United States veterans with prior autoimmune, infectious, inflammatory, and allergic disorders. Blood. 2008;111:3388–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Landgren O, Zeig-Owens R, Giricz O, Goldfarb D, Murata K, Ramanathan L, et al. Multiple myeloma and its precursor disease among firefighters exposed to the World Trade Center Disaster. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:821–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Offord JR, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1362–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma L, Xu S, Qu J, Hou J, Wang Y, Wen L, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in Chinese population: A prospective epidemiological study. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37:75–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta R, Dahiya M, Kumar L, Shekhar V, Sharma A, Ramakrishnan L, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in India-a hospital based study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018;18:e345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu SP, Minter A, Costello R, Zingone A, Lee C-K, Au W-Y, et al. MGUS prevalence in an ethically Chinese population in Hong Kong. Blood. 2013;121:2363–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Landgren O, Gridleg G, Turesson I, Caporaso NE, Goldin LR, Baris D, et al. Risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and subsequent multiple myeloma among African American and white veterans in the United States. Blood. 2006;107:904–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Landgren O, Graubard BI, Kumar S, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, Murata K, et al. Prevalence of myeloma precursor state monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in 12372 individuals 10–49 years-old: a population-based study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7:e618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sigurdardottir EE, Turesson I, Lund SH, Lindqvist EK, Mailankody S, Korde N, et al. The role of diagnosis and clinical follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance on survival in multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(2):168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kyle RA, Larson DR, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Cerhan JR, et al. Long-term follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:241–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuwabara C, Sakuma Y, Kume A, Tamura Y, Shimizu R, Iwai R, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of patients with non-immunoglobulin-M monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a retrospective study. Int J Hematol. 2019;109(2):154–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saleun JP, Vicariot M, Deroff P, Morin JF. Monoclonal gammmopathies in the adult population of Finistere. France J Clin Pathol. 1982;35:63–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to R. Maeda, H. Ooshima, and T. Miyoshi for data management and preparation. This study was supported by a Yasuda Women’s University Research Grant in 2018 and 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K. Fujimura conceived the project, designed the research, prepared the data base, and wrote the manuscript. J. Tanaka and other authors analyzed data and made the tables and figures. A. Maeda helped with data collection. All authors approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kingo Fujimura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Ethics approval

The study design was approved by ethics committees at Yasuda Women’s University (200004) and Hiroshima University (E-118).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 29 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujimura, K., Sugiyama, A., Akita, T. et al. Screening for M-proteinemia consisting of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma for 30 years among atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima. Int J Hematol 113, 576–585 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-03045-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-03045-y

Keywords

Navigation