Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical significance of subcategory and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease evaluated by National Institutes of Health consensus criteria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical significance of subcategory and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) as defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria, we retrospectively studied 211 patients with hematologic neoplasms who survived beyond 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Endpoints included chronic GVHD-specific survival (cGSS), duration of immunosuppressive treatment, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). A total of 96 patients fulfilled the NIH diagnostic criteria for cGVHD. In univariable analysis, patients with NIH overlap syndrome tended to exhibit lower cGSS compared to those with NIH classic cGVHD [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.76, P = 0.060], while patients with severe cGVHD at onset had a significantly lower cGSS compared to those with mild-to-moderate cGVHD (HR = 3.10, P = 0.034). The duration of immunosuppressive treatment was not significantly affected by either subcategory or severity of NIH cGVHD. In multivariable analysis treating cGVHD as a time-dependent covariate, development of overlap syndrome (HR = 3.90, P = 0.014) or severe cGVHD at peak worsening (HR = 6.21, P < 0.001) was significantly associated with higher risk of NRM compared to the absence of cGVHD. Our results suggest that both the subcategory and severity of NIH cGVHD are partly correlated with cGSS and may play a useful role in distinguishing patients at high risk for NRM, warranting validation of this approach through future prospective studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee S, Flowers M. Recognizing and managing chronic graft-versus-host disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008:134–41.

  2. Atkinson K, Horowitz M, Gale R, et al. Risk factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1990;75:2459–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Higman M, Vogelsang G. Chronic graft versus host disease. Br J Haematol. 2004;125:435–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner J, Flowers M, Longton G, Storb R, Schubert M, Sullivan K. The development of chronic graft-versus-host disease: an analysis of screening studies and the impact of corticosteroid use at 100 days after transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;22:139–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Przepiorka D, Anderlini P, Saliba R, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2001;98:1695–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlens S, Ringdén O, Remberger M, et al. Risk factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective single centre analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;22:755–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cutler C, Giri S, Jeyapalan S, Paniagua D, Viswanathan A, Antin J. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell and bone marrow transplantation: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3685–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohty M, Kuentz M, Michallet M, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation: long-term results of a randomized study. Blood. 2002;100:3128–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Randolph S, Gooley T, Warren E, Appelbaum F, Riddell S. Female donors contribute to a selective graft-versus-leukemia effect in male recipients of HLA-matched, related hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Blood. 2004;103:347–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atsuta Y, Suzuki R, Yamamoto K, et al. Risk and prognostic factors for Japanese patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;37:289–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McClune B, Weisdorf D, Pedersen T, et al. Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1878–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mielcarek M, Martin P, Leisenring W, et al. Graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative versus conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2003;102:756–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mielcarek M, Burroughs L, Leisenring W, et al. Prognostic relevance of ‘early-onset’ graft-versus-host disease following non-myeloablative haematopoietic cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:381–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shulman H, Sullivan K, Weiden P, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med. 1980;69:204–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee S, Klein J, Barrett A, et al. Severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease: association with treatment-related mortality and relapse. Blood. 2002;100:406–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers MED. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9:215–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Atkinson K, Horowitz M, Gale R, Lee M, Rimm A, Bortin M. Consensus among bone marrow transplanters for diagnosis, grading and treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Committee of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1989;4:247–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:945–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jagasia M, Giglia J, Chinratanalab W, et al. Incidence and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease using National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1207–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pérez-Simón J, Encinas C, Silva F, et al. Prognostic factors of chronic graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: the National Institutes Health scale plus the type of onset can predict survival rates and the duration of immunosuppressive therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:1163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho B, Min C, Eom K, et al. Feasibility of NIH consensus criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Leukemia. 2009;23:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arora M, Nagaraj S, Witte J, et al. New classification of chronic GVHD: added clarity from the consensus diagnoses. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;43:149–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim D, Lee J, Kim S, et al. Reevaluation of the National Institutes of Health criteria for classification and scoring of chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:1174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flowers MED, Parker PM, Johnston LJ, et al. Comparison of chronic graft-versus-host disease after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow in allogeneic recipients: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. Blood. 2002;100:415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stewart B, Storer B, Storek J, et al. Duration of immunosuppressive treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2004;104:3501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin P, Weisdorf D, Przepiorka D, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: VI. Design of Clinical Trials Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12:491–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kitawaki T, Kadowaki N, Ishikawa T, Ichinohe T, Uchiyama T. Compromised recovery of natural interferon-alpha/beta-producing cells after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation complicated by acute graft-versus-host disease and glucocorticoid administration. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32:187–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mizumoto C, Kanda J, Ichinohe T, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus and minidose methotrexate after unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning. Int J Hematol. 2009;89:538–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanda J, Mizumoto C, Kawabata H, et al. Clinical significance of serum hepcidin levels on early infectious complications in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:956–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.

  31. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim H. Cumulative incidence in competing risks data and competing risks regression analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cortese G, Andersen P. Competing risks and time-dependent covariates. Biom J. 2010;52:138–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim DH, Sohn SK, Baek JH, et al. Time to first flare-up episode of GVHD can stratify patients according to their prognosis during clinical course of progressive- or quiescent-type chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:779–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Flowers MED, Storer B, Carpenter P, et al. Treatment change as a predictor of outcome among patients with classic chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:1380–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Akpek G, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, et al. Development of a prognostic model for grading chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2001;97:1219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vigorito A, Campregher P, Storer B, et al. Evaluation of NIH consensus criteria for classification of late acute and chronic GVHD. Blood. 2009;114:702–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Rie Goi and Mika Kobayashi, for their expert data management and secretarial assistance, and all the staff of our transplant team for their dedicated care of the patients and donors.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuo Ichinohe.

Additional information

T. Uchiyama: Deceased.

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, T., Ichinohe, T., Kanda, J. et al. Clinical significance of subcategory and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease evaluated by National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Int J Hematol 93, 532–541 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-011-0820-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-011-0820-0

Keywords

Navigation