Skip to main content
Log in

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy as post-remission therapy for intermediate or poor risk adult acute myeloid leukemia: results of the JALSG AML97 study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prospectively compared allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with chemotherapy as a post-remission therapy in a multicenter trial (JALSG AML97) of adult patients with intermediate or poor risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Of 503 patients aged 15–50 years old registered between December 1997 and July 2001, 392 achieved complete remission (CR). CR patients classified in the intermediate or poor risk group using a new scoring system were tissue typed. Seventy-three with and 92 without an HLA-identical sibling were assigned to the donor and no-donor groups. Of 73 patients in the donor group, 38 (52%) received allo-HSCT during CR1 and 17 (23%) after relapse. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the relapse incidence was reduced in the donor group (52 vs. 77%; p = 0.008), and the disease-free survival (DFS) improved (39 vs. 19%; p = 0.016), but overall survival (OS) was not significantly different (46 vs. 29%; p = 0.088). The OS benefit was seen in the patients aged 36–50 years old (49 vs. 24%; p = 0.031), suggesting an advantage of allo-HSCT among older patients with leukemia that is more resistant to chemotherapy than that among younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohno R, Kobayashi T, Tanimoto M, et al. Randomized study of individualized induction therapy with or without vincristine, and of maintenance-intensification therapy between 4 or 12 courses in adult acute myeloid leukemia. AML-87 Study of the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group. Cancer. 1993;71(12):3888–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobayashi T, Miyawaki S, Tanimoto M, et al. Randomized trials between behenoyl cytarabine and cytarabine in combination induction and consolidation therapy, and with or without ubenimex after maintenance/intensification therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia. The Japan Leukemia Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(1):204–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miyawaki S, Tanimoto M, Kobayashi T, et al. No beneficial effect from addition of etoposide to daunorubicin, cytarabine, and 6-mercaptopurine in individualized induction therapy of adult acute myeloid leukemia: the JALSG-AML92 study. Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group. Int J Hematol. 1999;70(2):97–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchner T, Hiddemann W, Berdel WE, et al. 6-Thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) and high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM) for induction, TAD for consolidation, and either prolonged maintenance by reduced monthly TAD or TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation by sequential HAM in adult patients at all ages with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a randomized trial of the German AML Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(24):4496–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore JO, George SL, Dodge RK, et al. Sequential multiagent chemotherapy is not superior to high-dose cytarabine alone as postremission intensification therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults under 60 years of age: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9222. Blood. 2005;105(9):3420–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, et al. Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(14):896–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cassileth PA, Harrington DP, Appelbaum FR, et al. Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(23):1649–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harousseau JL, Cahn JY, Pignon B, et al. Comparison of autologous bone marrow transplantation and intensive chemotherapy as postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia. The Groupe Ouest Est Leucemies Aigues Myeloblastiques (GOELAM). Blood. 1997;90(8):2978–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bloomfield CD, Lawrence D, Byrd JC, et al. Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype. Cancer Res. 1998;58(18):4173–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burnett AK, Wheatley K, Goldstone AH, et al. The value of allogeneic bone marrow transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia at differing risk of relapse: results of the UK MRC AML 10 trial. Br J Haematol. 2002;118(2):385–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Byrd JC, Dodge RK, Carroll A, et al. Patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and acute myeloid leukemia have superior failure-free and overall survival when repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are administered. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(12):3767–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlenk RF, Benner A, Hartmann F, et al. Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the German multicenter AML HD93 treatment trial. Leukemia. 2003;17(8):1521–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suciu S, Mandelli F, de Witte T, et al. Allogeneic compared with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients younger than 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1): an intention-to-treat analysis of the EORTC/GIMEMAAML-10 trial. Blood. 2003;102(4):1232–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuriyama K, Tomonaga M, Kobayashi T, et al. Trial to extract prognostic factors prior to the start of induction chemotherapy for adult AML. Berlin: Springer; 1998. p. 901–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miyawaki S, Sakamaki H, Ohtake S, et al. A randomized, postremission comparison of four courses of standard-dose consolidation therapy without maintenance therapy versus three courses of standard-dose consolidation with maintenance therapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia: the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML 97 Study. Cancer. 2005;104(12):2726–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan E, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from imcomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keating S, de Witte T, Suciu S, et al. The influence of HLA-matched sibling donor availability on treatment outcome for patients with AML: an analysis of the AML 8A study of the EORTC Leukaemia Cooperative Group and GIMEMA. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell’Adulto. Br J Haematol. 1998;102(5):1344–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jourdan E, Boiron JM, Dastugue N, et al. Early allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for young adults with acute myeloblastic leukemia in first complete remission: an intent-to-treat long-term analysis of the BGMT experience. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7676–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cornelissen JJ, van Putten WL, Verdonck LF, et al. Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom? Blood. 2007;109(9):3658–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yanada M, Matsuo K, Emi N, Naoe T. Efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation depends on cytogenetic risk for acute myeloid leukemia in first disease remission: a metaanalysis. Cancer. 2005;103(8):1652–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gray R, Wheatley K. How to avoid bias when comparing bone marrow transplantation with chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991;7(Suppl 3):9–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Frassoni F, Labopin M, Gluckman E, et al. Results of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia have improved in Europe with time–a report of the acute leukemia working party of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996;17(1):13–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bacigalupo A, Sormani MP, Lamparelli T, et al. Reducing transplant-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2004;89(10):1238–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schlenk RF, Dohner K, Krauter J, et al. Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1909–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the clinicians of the 103 institutions who entered patients into the JALSG AML 97 study and provided the data to make this study possible. We also thank Ms. Y. Wada and Ms. Y. Komatsu for data management and Ms. Y. Makino of the JALSG office for providing valuable secretarial assistance. This study was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisashi Sakamaki.

Additional information

For the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG).

About this article

Cite this article

Sakamaki, H., Miyawaki, S., Ohtake, S. et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy as post-remission therapy for intermediate or poor risk adult acute myeloid leukemia: results of the JALSG AML97 study. Int J Hematol 91, 284–292 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-009-0483-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-009-0483-2

Keywords

Navigation