Abstract
The oolitic shoal reservoirs of the Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation carbonates in the Sichuan Basin of southwest China are an important target for gas exploration in the basin. Their occurrence, like other cases worldwide, can be divided into two locations in general, i.e., platform interior and platform margin locations. Their differences of reservoir features and origins, however, have not been investigated comprehensively due to different exploration degrees. This issue is addressed in this paper, to provide basic data and information for the basin’s hydrocarbon exploration and for the study of carbonate platform sedimentology and reservoir geology worldwide. We compared the features of these two types of reservoirs in detail, including the depositional and diagenetic features, pore types and petrophysical features. Based on the comparison, the origin of the reservoirs was further discussed. It is shown that the reservoirs in platform interior and platform margin locations differ significantly. The interior carbonates were deposited in moderate to high energy settings and the dominant lithologic type was limestone, which was weakly compacted and intensely cemented and has undergone meteoric dissolution. Pore types include intragranular dissolution and moldic pores, with low porosities (<6%) and low permeabilities (<0.1 mD). By contrast, the platform margin carbonates were deposited in relatively high energy settings and mainly consisted of dolostones with some limestones. The rocks were strongly compacted but incompletely cemented. As a result, some primary intergranular pores were preserved. Both meteoric solution and burial solution have taken place. There are various types of pore spaces including intergranular and intercrystalline solution pores and residual intergranular pores. This type of reservoir generally has better petrophysical properties (>9% porosity and >0.1 mD permeability) and pore-throat structures than the interior reservoirs. These differences were influenced by both primary depositional features and secondary diagenesis. For the interior carbonate reservoirs, early meteoric dissolution, weak compaction and strong cementation are important controlling factors. By contrast, the factors controlling the formation of the margin carbonate reservoirs mainly include dolomitization, preservation of primary pores and burial dissolution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bliefnick D M and Kaldi J G. Pore geometry: control on reservoir properties, Walker Creek Field, Columbia and Lafayette counties, Arkansas. AAPG Bulletin. 1996. 80(7): 1027–1044
Borkhataria R, Aigner T, Pöppelreiter M C, et al. Characterisation of epeiric “layer-cake” carbonate reservoirs: Upper Muschelkalk (Middle Triassic), the Netherlands. Journal of Petroleum Geology. 2005. 28(2):119–146
Carnell A J H and Wilson M E J. Dolomites in SE Asia-varied origins and implications for hydrocarbon exploration. Geologcal Society of London, Special Publication. 2004. 235: 255–300
Chen Z Q. Discussion on gas exploration of Feixianguan Formation in the Lower Triassic of Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica. 2007. 28(5): 12–26 (in Chinese)
Eichenseer H T, Walgenwitz F R and Biondi P J. Stratigraphic control on facies and diagenesis of dolomitized oolitic siliciclastic ramp sequences (Pinda Group, Albian, offshore Angola). AAPG Bulletin. 1999. 83(11): 1729–1758
Fan J S. Characteristics of carbonate reservoirs for oil and gas fields in the world and essential controlling factors for their formation. Earth Science Frontiers. 2005. 12(3): 23–30 (in Chinese)
Guo T L. Diagenesis of the Feixianguan oolitic shoal reservoirs in the northeastern Sichuan Basin-examples from Xuanhan-Daxian and Yuanba areas. Oil and Gas Geology. 2010. 31(5): 620–631 (in Chinese)
Heydari E. Porosity loss, fluid flow, and mass transfer in limestone reservoirs: Application to the Upper Jurassic Smackover Formation, Mississippi. AAPG Bulletin. 2000. 84(1): 100–118
Huang S J, Tong H P, Liu L H, et al. Petrography, geochemistry and dolomitization mechanisms of Feixianguan dolomites in Triassic, NE Sichuan, China. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2009. 25(10): 1363–1372 (in Chinese)
Keith B D and Zuppann C W. Mississippian oolites and petroleum reservoirs in the United States-an overview. In: Mississippian Oolites and Modern Analogs. AAPG Studies in Geology. 1993. 35: 1–12
Liu S G, Huang W M, Zhang C J, et al. Research status of dolomite genesis and its problems in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs. 2008. 20(2): 6–15 (in Chinese)
Luo B, Tan X C, Liu H, et al. Genetic mechanism analysis on oolitic reservoir of Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation in the Shunan area, Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica. 2009. 27(3): 404–409 (in Chinese)
Luo P, Zhang J, Liu W, et al. Characteristics of marine carbonate hydrocarbon reservoirs in China. Earth Science Frontiers. 2008. 15(1): 36–39 (in Chinese)
Ma Y S, Cai X Y and Zhao P R. The research status and advances in porosity evolution and diagenesis of deep carbonate reservoir. Earth Science Frontiers. 2011. 18(4): 181–192 (in Chinese)
Ma Y S, Guo X S, Guo T L, et al. Discovery of the large-scale Puguang prospecting. Geological Review. 2005. 25(4): 476–480 (in Chinese)
Ma Y S, Guo X S, Guo T L, et al. The Puguang gas field: New giant discovery in the mature Sichuan Basin, southwest China. AAPG Bulletin. 2007. 91(5): 627–643
Ran L H, Chen G S and Xu R F. Discovery and exploration of Luojiazhai Gas Field, Sichuan Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology. 2005. 10(1): 43–47 (in Chinese)
Ronchi P, Ortenzi A, Borromeo O, et al. Depositional setting and diagenetic processes and their impact on the reservoir quality in the late Visean-Bashkirian Kashagan carbonate platform (Pre-Caspian Basin, Kazakhstan). AAPG Bulletin. 2010. 94(9): 1313–1348
Schauer M and Aigner T. Cycle stacking pattern, diagenesis and reservoir geology of peritidal dolostones, Trigonodus-dolomite, Upper Muschelkalk (Middle Triassic, SW Germany). Facies. 1997. 37(1): 99–114
Schmoker J W and Halley R B. Carbonate porosity versus depth: A predictable relation for south Florida. AAPG Bulletin. 1982. 66(5): 2561–2570
Su L P, Luo P, Hu S R, et al. Diagenesis of oolitic bank of the Feixianguan Formation of Lower Triassic in Luojiazhai Gas Field, Northeastern Sichuan Province. Journal of Palaeogeography. 2004. 6(2): 182–190 (in Chinese)
Su L P, Luo P, Luo Z, et al. Characteristics of Feixianguan Formation oolitic shoal reservoirs in Northeast Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry. 2005. 25(6): 14–17 (in Chinese)
Tong C G. Tectonic Evolution and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the Sichuan Basin. Beijing: Geological Publishing House. 1992. 19–37 (in Chinese)
Wang Y G, Hong H T, Xia M L, et al. Exploration of reef-bank gas reservoirs surrounding Permian and Triassic troughs in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry. 2008. 28(1): 22–27 (in Chinese)
Wang Y G, Wen Y C, Hong H T, et al. Diagenesis of Triassic Feixianguan Formation in Sichuan Basin, Southwest China. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica. 2007. 25(6): 831–839 (in Chinese)
Wei G Q, Chen G S, Yang W, et al. Sedimentary system of platformal trough of Feixianguan Formation of Lower Triassic in Northern Sichuan Basin and its evolution. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica. 2004. 22(2): 254–260 (in Chinese)
Wei G Q, Xie Z Y, Liu M C, et al. Favourable reservoir facies tracts in the Changxing-Feixianguan formations of Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry. 2009. 29(9): 35–38 (in Chinese)
Westphal H, Eberli G P, Smith L B, et al. Reservoir characterization of the Mississippian Madison Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming. AAPG Bulletin. 2004. 88(4): 405–432
Yang X P, Zhao W Z, Cao H, et al. Formation and distribution of Triassic Feixianguan oolitic bank favourable reservoir in the NE Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2006. 33(1): 17–21 (in Chinese)
Zeng W, Huang X P, Yang Y, et al. The origin and distribution of dolostone in Feixianguan Formation in Lower Triassic series, Northeast Sichuan. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University. 2007. 29(1): 19–22 (in Chinese)
Zhang B Q and Hu M Y. Diagenesis and porosity evolution characteristics of Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation in the Eastern Sichuan and Western Hubei. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology. 2008. 30(6): 9–14 (in Chinese)
Zhao W Z, Luo P, Chen G S, et al. Origin and reservoir rock characteristics of dolostones in the Early Triassic Feixianguan Formation, NE Sichuan Basin, China: Significance for future gas exploration. Journal of Petroleum Geology. 2005. 28(1): 83–100
Zhao W Z, Wang Z C and Wang Y G. Formation mechanism of highly effective gas pools in the Feixianguan Formation in the NE Sichuan Basin. Geological Review. 2006. 52(5): 708–717 (in Chinese)
Zhao Z J, Fan G Z, Wu X N, et al. Reservoir types, exploration domains and exploration strategy of marine carbonates in China. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology. 2007. 12(1): 1–11 (in Chinese)
Zheng R C, Wen H G, Zheng C, et al. Genesis of dolostone of the Feixianguan Formation, Lower Triassic in the NE Sichuan Basin: Evidences from rock structure and strontium content and isotopic composition. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2009. 25(10): 2459–2468 (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, X., Zhao, L., Luo, B. et al. Comparison of basic features and origins of oolitic shoal reservoirs between carbonate platform interior and platform margin locations in the Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation of the Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Pet. Sci. 9, 417–428 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-012-0229-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-012-0229-2