Kosteneffektivität der Stress-MRT bei KHK-Verdacht

Cost-effectiveness of stress MRI in suspected coronary artery disease

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, Brown JM, Nixon J, Everett CC et al (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 379:453–460

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JWR, Norgaard BL, Zarins CK, Knaapen P et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 38:991–998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, Bettencourt N, Shah AM, Hussain ST et al (2019) Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med 380:2418–2428

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Greenwood JP, Ripley DP, Berry C, McCann GP, Plein S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C et al (2016) Effect of care guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or NICE guidelines on subsequent unnecessary angiography rates: the CE-MARC 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:1051–1060

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C et al (2020) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41(3):407–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425

  6. 6.

    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schulz-Menger J (2016) Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kwong RY, Ge Y, Steel K, Bingham S, Abdullah S, Fujikura K et al (2019) Cardiac magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging for evaluation of patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 74:1741–1755

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lipinski MJ, McVey CM, Berger JS, Kramer CM, Salerno M (2013) Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:826–838

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pilz G, Patel PA, Fell U, Ladapo JA, Rizzo JA, Fang H et al (2011) Adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: a net cost analysis and reimbursement implications. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(1):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9645-9

  10. 10.

    Boldt J, Leber AW, Bonaventura K, Sohns C, Stula M, Huppertz A et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Germany. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:30

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Moschetti K, Muzzarelli S, Pinget C, Wagner A, Pilz G, Wasserfallen JB et al (2012) Cost evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary angiography for the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: Application of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry data to the German, United Kingdom, Swiss, and United States health care systems. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:35

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prof. Dr. Florian von Knobelsdorff.

Ethics declarations


F. von Knobelsdorff gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Knobelsdorff, F. Kosteneffektivität der Stress-MRT bei KHK-Verdacht. Kardiologe (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-020-00422-z

Download citation