Literatur
Felix CM, Fam JM, Diletti R et al (2016) Mid- to longterm clinical outcomes of the patients treated with everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. The BVS Expand Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(16):1652–1663
Capodanno D, Gori T, Nef H, Latib A, Mehilli J, Lesiak M, Caramanno G, Naber C, Di Mario C, Colombo A, Capranzano P, Wiebe J, Araszkiewicz A, Geraci S, Pyxaras S, Mattesini A, Naganuma T, Münzel T, Tamburino C (2015) Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: Early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry. EuroIntervention 10(10):1144–1153 (Feb)
Puricel S, Cuculi F, Weissner M, Schmermund A, Jamshidi P, Nyffenegger T, Binder H, Eggebrecht H, Münzel T, Cook S, Gori T (2016) Bioresorbable coronary scaffold thrombosis: Multicenter comprehensive analysis of clinical presentation, mechanisms, and predictors. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(8):921–931
Tan HC, Ananthakrishna R (2016) Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: Should we wait longer? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(16):1664–1666
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
H. Eggebrecht gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eggebrecht, H. Bioresorbierbare koronare Scaffolds: Zweifel an der Sicherheit bleiben bestehen. Kardiologe 10, 341–342 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-016-0088-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-016-0088-y