Literatur
Righini M, Le Gal G, Aujesky D et al (2008) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 371:1343–1352
Belle A van, Buller HR, Huisman MV et al (2006) Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 295:172–179
Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK et al (2009) VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies. Thromb Haemost 101:886–892
Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL et al (2014) Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA 311:1117–1124
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. S. Matzath gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matzath, S. ADJUST-PE-Studie. Kardiologe 9, 131–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-015-0655-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-015-0655-7