Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Herzkatheter via A. radialis: Ist der femorale Zugangsweg noch zeitgemäß?

Left heart catheterisation using the radial artery: Is femoral access still justified?

  • Kommentare
  • Published:
Der Kardiologe Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1409–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H et al (2012) Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart 98:303–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A et al (2012) Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012 [epub ahead of print]. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017.

  4. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS et al (2006) Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 114:774–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ndrepepa G, Berger PB, Mehilli J et al (2008) Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:690–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M et al (2009) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157:132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vorobcsuk A, Kónyi A, Aradi D et al (2009) Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 158:814–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS et al (2011) Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:336–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brasselet C, Blanpain T, Tassan-Mangina S et al (2008) Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. Eur Heart J 29:63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W et al (2009) A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:1047–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mercuri M, Mehta S, Xie C et al (2011) Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:347–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuipers G, Delewi R, Velders XL et al (2012) Radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary angiograms performed by the radial compared with the femoral route. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5:752–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kotowycz MA, Dzavik V (2012) Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uhlemann M, Mobius-Winkler S, Mende M et al (2012) The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5:36–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angabe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Innere Medizin/Kardiologie, Universität Leipzig – Herzzentrum, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland

    H. Thiele

Authors
  1. H. Thiele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Thiele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thiele, H. Herzkatheter via A. radialis: Ist der femorale Zugangsweg noch zeitgemäß?. Kardiologe 6, 423–426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-012-0451-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-012-0451-6

Search

Navigation