Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Open Brostrom for Lateral Ligament Stabilization

  • Management of Ankle Instability (M Hogan, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Lateral ankle ligament sprains are one of the most commonly reported injuries in high-level athletes and the general population. Unfortunately, up to 40% of these can go on to develop chronic lateral ankle instability which in the right circumstances requires surgical intervention. The purpose of this review is to present the gold standard surgical treatment for chronic lateral instability with anatomic ligament repair and to highlight the techniques, outcomes, and importance of anatomy when considering surgical treatment.

Recent Findings

Recent and remote literature agrees that the initial treatment for chronic ankle instability is non-operative rehabilitation. In the cases where this fails, the gold standard of surgical treatment is open anatomic repair using the Brostrom-Gould technique which stands out as having very good results over the course of time. Recent studies have shown equally good outcomes with arthroscopy as well as with internal brace devices, and both techniques show potential for earlier rehabilitation. In those with contraindications for anatomic repair including innate soft tissue laxity, high BMI, and in the revision setting, anatomic ligament reconstruction is an appropriate surgical option.

Summary

Open modified Brostrom lateral ligament repair continues to be the preferred method of surgical treatment for chronic lateral ligament instability. In the setting of new modifications and techniques, long-term outcome studies are necessary to identify both their usefulness in long term and to compare them to the open surgery outcomes. It would be useful to standardize rehabilitation protocols as well as return to sport metrics in order to better evaluate outcomes moving forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014;44:123–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. • Roos KG, Kerr ZY, Mauntel TC, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Wikstrom EA. The epidemiology of lateral ligament complex ankle sprains in National Collegiate Athletic Association sports. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:201–9 In a survey of 25 sports utilizing the NCAA Injury Surveillance Program (NCAA-ISP) for the academic years 2009-2010 to 2014-2015, 2429 lateral ligament complex ankle sprains were recorded. This translated to a rate of 4.59 sprains per 10,000 athlete exposures. Sprains of the lateral ligament complex amounted to 7.3% of all collegiate sports injuries during the time period analyzed. Sports with the highest rate of lateral ligament sprains were men's and women's basketball with most recurrent sprains occurring in women's basketball, outdoor track, and field hockey. Many athletes (44%) were able to return to play within 24 hours, however, 3.6% required greater than 3 weeks time prior to return to play. The study concluded that lateral ligament complex ankle sprains were the most common injury reported in the collegiate athletes included in the study, making the treatment and prevention of such injuries of utmost importance.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. • Doherty C, Bleakley C, Delahunt E, Holden S. Treatment and prevention of acute and recurrent ankle sprain: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:113–25 This systematic review of the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability summarized the outcomes of their subjects based on injury, recurrent injury rate, and function. 46 papers were included which found strong evidence for the treatment of acute ankle sprains with NSAIDs, and early mobilization. There was moderate evidence for exercise and manual therapy in acute injuy and strong evidence for exercise therapy and bracing in the prevention of chronic ankle instability.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shawen SB, Dworak T, Anderson RB. Return to play following ankle sprain and lateral ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2016;35:697–709.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen H, Li HY, Zhang J, Hua YH, Chen SY. Difference in postural control between patients with functional and mechanical ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:1068–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knupp M, Lang TH, Zwicky L, Lötscher P, Hintermann B. Chronic ankle instability (medial and lateral). Clin Sports Med. 2015;34:679–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCriskin BJ. Management and prevention of acute and chronic lateral ankle instability in athletic patient populations. World J Orthop. 2015;6:161–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Mohrej O, Al-Kenani N. Chronic ankle instability: current perspectives. Avicenna J Med. 2016;6:103–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi T, Gamada K. Lateral ankle sprain and chronic ankle instability: a critical review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7:298–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. • Vuurberg G, Hoorntje A, Wink LM, BFW VDD, Van Den Bekerom MP, Dekker R, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ankle sprains: Update of an evidence-based clinical guideline. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:956 This paper outlines evidence based guidelines for the treatment of acute lateral ligament sprains/ruptures including the use of brief immobilization followed by an exercise program with limited use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications for pain and swelling. Surgery should only be considered in those that fail conservative modalities. Bracing is a viable option for those with recurrrent ankle instability.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. • Miklovic TM, Donovan L, Protzuk OA, Kang MS, Feger MA. Acute lateral ankle sprain to chronic ankle instability: a pathway of dysfunction. Phys Sportsmed. 2018;46:116–22 This review paper evaluated the impairment-based rehabilitation model developed to treat the various impairments associated with chronic ankle instability whichh include decreased range of motion, decreased strength, loss of postural control, and altered movement patterns. The significant findings of this review noted similar symptoms in subjects who had sustained acute lateral ankle sprains. Since the impairment-based rehabilitation model has been successful in treating chronic ankle instability it would be reasonable to institute a similar protocol for the treatment of acute lateral sprains that display similar symptomatic profiles.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Odak S, Ahluwalia R, Shivarathre DG, Mahmood A, Blucher N, Hennessy M, et al. Arthroscopic evaluation of impingement and osteochondral lesions in chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:1045–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Delco ML, Kennedy JG, Bonassar LJ, Fortier LA. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: a distinct clinical entity requiring new research approaches. J Orthop Res. 2017;35:440–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Broström L. Sprained ankles. V. Treatment and prognosis in recent ligament ruptures. Acta Chir Scand. 1966;132:537–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Golanó P, Vega J, de Leeuw PAJ, Malagelada F, Manzanares MC, Götzens V, et al. Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;18:557–69.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clanton TO, Campbell KJ, Wilson KJ, Michalski MP, Goldsmith MT, Wijdicks CA, et al. Qualitative and quantitative anatomic investigation of the lateral ankle ligaments for surgical reconstruction procedures. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014;96:e98.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khawaji B, Soames R. The anterior talofibular ligament: a detailed morphological study. Foot. 2015;25:141–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. •• Hunt KJ, Pereira H, Kelley J, Anderson N, Fuld R, Baldini T, et al. The role of calcaneofibular ligament injury in ankle instability: implications for surgical management. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:431–7 This descriptive laboratory study utilized 10 matched pairs of cadaver specimens to evaluate the role of the ATFL and CLF in ankle stability. The ankle specimens were mounted in 20° of ankle plantarflexion and 15° of internal rotation and subsequently axially loaded to body weight. At this point they were inverted from 0° to 20°. The ATFL and CFL were cut sequentially and the inversion was performed again. Measurements included stiffness, peak torque, peak pressure, contact area, and inversion angles of the talus and calcaneus relative to the fibula. The sectioning of the CFL resulted in decreased stiffness and peak torque with increased contact area and a larger inversion angle. They also found increased medial displacement of the calcaneus. The study concluded that the CFL is important for overall ankle stability and should be considered for surgical repair or reconstruction to prevent long term sequelae.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi T, Yamakawa S, Watanabe K, Kimura K, Suzuki D, Otsubo H, et al. The in situ force in the calcaneofibular ligament and the contribution of this ligament to ankle joint stability. Clin Biomech. 2016;40:8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rigby R, Cottom JM, Rozin R. Isolated calcaneofibular ligament injury: a report of two cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:487–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khor YP, Tan KJ. The anatomic pattern of injuries in acute inversion ankle sprains: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Orthop J Sport Med. 2013;1:232596711351707.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Doherty C, Bleakley C, Hertel J, Caulfield B, Ryan J, Delahunt E. Recovery from a first-time lateral ankle sprain and the predictors of chronic ankle instability: a prospective cohort analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:995–1003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krause F, Seidel A. Malalignment and lateral ankle instability: causes of failure from the varus tibia to the cavovarus foot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23:593–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klammer G, Benninger E, Espinosa N. The varus ankle and instability. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17:57–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosen AB, Ko J, Brown CN. Diagnostic accuracy of instrumented and manual talar tilt tests in chronic ankle instability populations. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:e214–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. • Doherty C, Bleakley C, Hertel J, Caulfield B, Ryan J, Delahunt E. Clinical tests have limited predictive value for chronic ankle instability when conducted in the acute phase of a first-time lateral ankle sprain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:720–5 This cohort study evaluated acute lateral ankle sprains utilizing multiple tests to try to predict long term outcomes including the development of chronic ankle instability. 82 subjects underwent testing two weeks after their acute sprain. At 12 months, 40% of subjects were diagnosed with chronic ankle instability. Logistic regression anlysis showed that no single test was in itself predictive of outcome but that the combination of multiple tests including the talar glide, talar tilt, range of motion, and anterior drawer tests were statistically significant with sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 72%. They concluded that testing after an acute lateral ankle sprain has limited predictive value.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dowling LB, Giakoumis M, Ryan JD. Narrowing the normal range for lateral ankle ligament stability with stress radiography. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53:269–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeong BO, Kim TY, Song WJ. Effect of preoperative stress radiographic findings on radiographic and clinical outcomes of the modified Broström procedure for chronic ankle instability. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55:125–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. • Cao S, Wang C, Ma X, Wang X, Huang J, Zhang C. Imaging diagnosis for chronic lateral ankle ligament injury: a systemic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:122 This systematic review with meta-analysis looked at the accuracy of imaging in the diagnosis of chronic ankle instability. Ultimately after evaluating 15 studies with 695 subjects, ultrasound was found to have the best accuracing in diagnosing chronic ATFL injury while MRI had limited value for detecting chronic ligament injury.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. • Staats K, Sabeti-Aschraf M, Apprich S, Platzgummer H, Puchner SE, Holinka J, et al. Preoperative MRI is helpful but not sufficient to detect associated lesions in patients with chronic ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:2103–9 In patients with chronic ankle instability it is important to try an identify other possible pathologic conditions prior to operative intervention. This evaluation of 30 patients utilized MRI prior to ankle arthroscopy to compare the MRI and intraoperative findings. In all there were 72 pathologic conditions noted on arthroscopy compared to 73 found on MRI imaging. The sensitivity of MRI was higher for anterior impingement, peroneal tendinopathy, and loose bodies compared to other ligamentous lesions. Overall while MRI can be useful for preoperative evaluation, arthroscopy remains the gold standard.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gould N, Seligson D, Gassman J. Early and late repair of lateral ligament of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1980;1:84–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeong BO, Kim MS, Song WJ, Soohoo NF. Feasibility and outcome of inferior extensor retinaculum reinforcement in modified broström procedures. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:1137–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Behrens SB, Drakos M, Lee BJ, Paller D, Hoffman E, Koruprolu S, et al. Biomechanical analysis of Brostrom versus Brostrom-Gould lateral ankle instability repairs. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:587–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pearce CJ, Tourné Y, Zellers J, Terrier R, Toschi P, Silbernagel KG. Rehabilitation after anatomical ankle ligament repair or reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1130–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. White WJ, McCollum GA, Calder JDF. Return to sport following acute lateral ligament repair of the ankle in professional athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1124–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Petrera M, Dwyer T, Theodoropoulos JS, Ogilvie-Harris DJ. Short- to medium-term outcomes after a modified Broström repair for lateral ankle instability with immediate postoperative weightbearing. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1542–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. •• Lee K, Jegal H, Chung H, Park Y. Return to play after modified broström operation for chronic ankle instability in elite athletes. CiOS Clin Orthop Surg. 2019;11:126–30 This study evaluated elite athletes with lateral ankle instability and reported return to play at three separate time points including return to personal training, team training, and actual game participation. 60 athletes were evaluated who had undergone the modified Brostrom procedure. The average age was 19.3 and the athletes were followed up at an average of 28.8 months. They were divided into two groups with one group returning early to play compared to the other. The return to personal training took a mean of 1.9 months, a mean of 2.9 months for team training, and 3.9 months for full game participation. Overall the return to play at 4 months was 83.3% and 100% 8 months after surgery.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. •• Hunt KJ, Fuld RS, Sutphin BS, Pereira H, D’Hooghe P. Return to sport following lateral ankle ligament repair is under-reported: a systematic review. J ISAKOS Jt Disord Orthop Sport Med. 2017;2:5 This systematic review evaluated the literature for return to sport criteria and timeline for return to sport after lateral ligament complex reconstruction. 20 articles were included, 13 of which were utlilized to calculate an average return to play time of 4.7 months postoperatively. The conclusion of this study was that there is little data in the literature regarding a reliable timeline for return to play and that further studies are necessary to form a consistent reporting system and criteria for return to play after lateral ligament repair surgery.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hamilton WG, Thompson FM, Snow SW. The modified Brostrom procedure for lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. •• Cho BK, Park JK, Choi SM, SooHoo NF. The effect of peroneal muscle strength on functional outcomes after the modified Broström procedure for chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39:105–12 This evaluation of functional status of the peroneal muscles after modified brostrom procedure found that post-operative peroneal strength was approximately 80% of the contralateral limb. 41 patients were evaluated using isokinetic dynamometer as well as the FAOS and FAAM patient outcome scores. There was no difference amongst the groups in functional outcomes even without 100% recovery of peroneal strength in the setting of modified Brostrom procedure.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rigby RB, Cottom JM. A comparison of the “all-inside” arthroscopic Broström procedure with the traditional open modified Broström-Gould technique: a review of 62 patients. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25:31–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. • Li H, Hua Y, Li H, Ma K, Li S, Chen S. Activity level and function 2 years after anterior talofibular ligament repair: a comparison between arthroscopic repair and open repair procedures. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:2044–51 This cohort study examined 60 patients and compared those that underwent arthroscopic ATFL repair (23 patients) to those who had the open procedure (37 patients). At follow up no patient had any lateral ankle instability. Patient reported outcomes showed no difference between the two groups and ultimately they concluded that the arthroscopic repair was equivocal to open repair when arthroscopy was technically able to be performed.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. • Guelfi M, Zamperetti M, Pantalone A, Usuelli FG, Salini V, Oliva XM. Open and arthroscopic lateral ligament repair for treatment of chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24:11–8 This systematic review included 13 studies with 505 total ankles treated with an open Broström ATFL repair after an average follow up of 73.4 months. 11 studies reported postoperative AOFAS scores with a mean value of 90.1 and 91.7% satisfaction rate. The overall surgical complication rate was 7.92%. Arthroscopic techniques were described in only 6 studies with mean follow up of 37.2 months, and a patient satisfaction rate of 96.4%. Complications in the arthroscopic group were higher at 15.27%. Prospective comparison studies are needed to fully delineate the efficacy of both procedures.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yasui Y, Murawski CD, Wollstein A, Kennedy JG. Reoperation rates following ankle ligament procedures performed with and without concomitant arthroscopic procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1908–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee KT, Kim ES, Kim YH, Ryu JS, Rhyu IJ, Lee YK. All-inside arthroscopic modified Broström operation for chronic ankle instability: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1096–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schuh R, Benca E, Willegger M, Hirtler L, Zandieh S, Holinka J, et al. Comparison of Broström technique, suture anchor repair, and tape augmentation for reconstruction of the anterior talofibular ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1101–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brown CA, Hurwit D, Behn A, Hunt KJ. Biomechanical comparison of an all-soft suture anchor with a modified Broström-Gould suture repair for lateral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:417–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. . Coetzee JC, Ellington JK, Ronan JA, Stone RM. Functional results of open Broström ankle ligament repair augmented with a suture tape. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39:304–10 This case series evaluated 81 patients who had previously undergone a Broström and InternalBraceTM augmentation at a single time point postoperatively between 6-24 months. Multiple outcomes were measured including demographics, surgical time, clinical measurements, AOFAS, VR-12, and VAS scores. The mean return to sport was 84.1 days post-operatively. A single leg hop test was used to evaluate functional status and showed that 86.4% of patients were able to achieve normal or near normal function. Range of motion returned to normal when compared to the non-operative side. Overall the use of the InternalBraceTM resulted in good outcomes in this short term study.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. •• Park S, Kim T, Lee M, Park Y. Absence of ATFL remnant does not affect the clinical outcomes of the modified Broström operation for chronic ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;28:213–20 Outcomes for the modified Broström are not wholly dependent on the quality of the remaining ATFL tissue present at time of surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, 60 patients with chronic ankle instability underwent evaluation of the ATFL remnant using ultrasound, MRI, and arthroscopy. After a mean follow-up of 30 months, there was no difference in the FAOS scores of subjects with or without an ATFL remnant when accounting for other variables using regression analysis. Remnant thickness was not found to correlate with FAOS scores. The study concluded that clinical outcomes of the modified Brostrom were found to be good regardless of the state of the ATFL remnant.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Maffulli GD, Oliva F, Testa V, Capasso G, et al. Isolated anterior talofibular ligament Broström repair for chronic lateral ankle instability: 9-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:858–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Park KH, Lee JW, Suh JW, Shin MH, Choi WJ. Generalized ligamentous laxity is an independent predictor of poor outcomes after the modified Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2975–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Matheny LM, Johnson NS, Liechti DJ, Clanton TO. Activity level and function after lateral ankle ligament repair versus reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;44:1301–8.

    Google Scholar 

  53. •• Vuurberg G, Pereira H, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN. Anatomic stabilization techniques provide superior results in terms of functional outcome in patients suffering from chronic ankle instability compared to non-anatomic techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:2183–95 This systematic review article outlines the results of 19 articles which included 882 patients who had undergone a surgical procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. They compared those that had an anatomic repair with those that underwent anatomic reconstruction or tenodesis. Anatomic repair showed the highest post-operative patient outcome scores and anatomic reconstruction showed the highest score increase from preop to postop. Both anatomic procedures had significantly better outcomes when compared to tenodesis.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA

    Kenneth J. Hunt & Rebecca Griffith

Authors
  1. Kenneth J. Hunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca Griffith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Griffith.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Rebecca Griffith declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Kenneth Hunt declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of Ankle Instability

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hunt, K.J., Griffith, R. Open Brostrom for Lateral Ligament Stabilization. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 13, 788–796 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09679-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09679-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation