Abstract
Purpose of Review
The primary goal of this review is to update recent literature on revision PCL reconstruction and to discuss factors relevant to surgical failure, surgical indications and goals, patient evaluation, surgical decision-making, graft selection, surgical technique, associated surgical procedures, postoperative rehabilitation, and revision PCL reconstruction results.
Recent Findings
Specifically, it is paramount to consider and treat posteromedial and posterolateral instability. Success in revision surgery focuses on appropriate graft choice and precise tunnel placement at anatomical attachment sites. Furthermore, correct tensioning of the graft, secondary or backup fixation and well-designed PT and rehab protocols are integral components. The factors causing failure of the primary reconstruction should be identified, as revision surgery must address the errors and follow strict surgical principals to be successful.
Summary
There are many variables that play a role in successful revision posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. In general, as in most ligament reconstruction surgery, it is important to identify and address all associated pathology such as lower extremity malalignment and additional instability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schulz MS, Russe K, Jürgen Eichhorn H. Arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage lesions in posterior cruciate ligament—deficient knees. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):262–8.
Ao Y, Cheng X, Hu Y, Cui G, Yu J. Clinical research for reason analysis of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;47(7):541–4.
• Tischer T, et al. The impact of osseous malalignment and realignment procedures in knee ligament surgery: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(3):2325967117697287. Failed ACL and PCL reconstruction should necessitate evaluation of tibial slope and malalignment with possible need for osteotomies to correct varus/valgus and tibial slope.
Li J, Kong F, Gao X, Shen Y, Gao S. Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and proprioception for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft, hybrid graft, and γ-irradiated allograft. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(12):2548–55.
Werner BC, Gilmore CJ, Hamann JC, Gaskin CM, Carroll JJ, Hart JM, et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results of a single-stage approach using allograft dowel bone grafting for femoral defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(8):581–7.
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Posterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction, Part 1: causes of surgical failure in 52 consecutive operations. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(5):646–54.
Johannsen AM, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):35–42.
Saddler SC, Noyes FR, Grood ES, Knochenmuss DR, Hefzy MS. Posterior cruciate ligament anatomy and length-tension behavior of PCL surface fibers. Am J Knee Surg. 1996;9(4):194–9.
Mejia EA, Noyes FR, Grood ES. Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. Importance for reconstructive procedures. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(5):643–51.
Shin Y-S, Kim H-J, Lee D-H. No clinically important difference in knee scores or instability between transtibial and inlay techniques for PCL reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(4):1239–48.
Song E-K, Park H-W, Ahn Y-S, Seon J-K. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):2964–71.
Richter D, Wascher DC, Schenck RC. A novel posteromedial approach for tibial inlay PCL reconstruction in KDIIIM injuries: avoiding prone patient positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(9):2680–90.
Fanelli GC, Fanelli MG, Fanelli DG. Revision posterior cruciate ligament surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2017;25(1):30–5.
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Posterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction, Part 2: results of revision using a 2-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(5):655–65.
• Mygind-Klavsen B, Nielsen TG, Lind MC. Outcomes after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in patients with isolated and combined PCL tears. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(4):2325967117700077. Isolated PCL reconstructions versus multi-ligament reconstructions compared similarly in laxity and subjective outcome scores and no differences were seen in regard to graft choice, PCL reconstruction technique, and knee dislocation type and the revision rate was 5.2%.
Wang D, Berger N, Cohen JR, Lord EL, Wang JC, Hame SL. Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency in the United States. Orthopedics. 2015;38(4):e281–6.
• DePhillipo NN, Cinque ME, Godin JA, Moatshe G, Chahla J, LaPrade RF. Posterior tibial translation measurements on magnetic resonance imaging improve diagnostic sensitivity for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries and graft tears. Am J Sports Med. 2017:363546517734201. Measuring posteromedial tibial translation on MRI has improved diagnostic sensitivity for chronic PCL injuries and graft failures.
Lee SH, Jung YB, Lee H-J, Jung H-J, Kim SH. Revision posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a modified tibial-inlay double-bundle technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(6):516–22.
Weber AE, Bissell B, Wojtys EM, Sekiya JK. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(9):2667–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Both authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on PCL Update
