Return to Throwing after Shoulder or Elbow Injury
Purpose of review
Throwing places high demands on the human body, and specific characteristics are developed over time unique to these athletes. When returning to throw after injury, it is important to follow a criterion-based progression that allows the body to be prepared appropriately for the stresses that throwing will require. There is currently a void in the literature for criteria-based progression that helps these athletes return to the highest level of play.
As injury rates continue to rise in baseball, there is increased evidence showing contributions of the core and lower extremity to the baseball pitch. There is also additional data showing pitcher specific characteristics such as range of motion and scapular position in this unique population. The rehab professional should take into account every phase of the pitch starting from balance through ball release when designing a comprehensive return-to-throwing program.
Returning an athlete back to a throwing sport can be an overwhelming task. The rehabilitation specialist must have a sound understanding of the throwing motion as well as any biomechanical implications on the body, contributions throughout the kinetic chain, range of motion, and strength characteristics specific to the thrower as well as proper tissue loading principles. It is important that these athletes are not progressed too quickly through their programs and that a criteria-based progression is followed. They should have normalized range of motion, strength, and scapular mechanics, followed by a sound plyometric progression. Once this is achieved, they are advanced to an interval throwing program with increasing distance, effort, and volume which should be tracked for workload, making sure they do not throw more than their body is prepared for.
KeywordsReturn-to-throw Return-to-play Plyometrics
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Both authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 4.Erickson BJ, Chalmers PN, Bush-Joseph CA, Verma NN, Romeo AA. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow a systematic review of the literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 1–7.Google Scholar
- 8.• Camp CL, Zajac JM, Pearson DB, Sinatro AM, Spiker AM, Werner BC, et al. Decreased shoulder external rotation and flexion are greater predictors of injury than internal rotation deficits: analysis of 132 pitcher-seasons in professional baseball. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017;33(9):1629–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.025. This paper is a nice reivew of normal range of motion in elite pitchers. This data revealed that preseason shoulder ER and flexion deficits are risk factors for development of elbow injuries. This can help others treating this population identify and address these potential risk factors. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.• Davies G, Riemann BL, Manske R. Current concepts of plyometric exercise. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(6):760–86. This paper is a comprehensive look at plyometric exercise and its application in rehabilitation programs. It provides a nice overview of plyometrics, phases, neurophysilogical basis of plyometrics and clinical guidelines for implementation. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.• Lorenz D, Morrison S. Current concepts in periodization of strength and conditioning for the sports. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(6):66213. This paper reviews what is currently known about periodization and gives a comprehensive way of applying it within a sports medicine practice.It may be of benefit to apply these models in long term rehabilitation programs for sports related injuries. Google Scholar
- 27.Mangine G, Ratamess N, Hoffman JR, Faigenbaum A, Kang J, Chilakos A. The effects of combined ballistic and heavy resistance training on maximal lower and upper body strength in recreationally trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(1):132–9. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f5729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.• Murray NB, Gabbett TJ, Townshend AD, Blanch P. Calculating acute:chronic workload ratios using exponentially weighted moving averages provides a more sensitive indicator of injury likelihood than rolling averages. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(9):749–54. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097152. Data examining acute and chronic workload ratio in relation to injury risk. This study sets parameters for moderate, high and very high workload thresholds. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Fleisig GS, Diffendaffer AZ, Ivey B, Aune KT. Do baseball pitchers improve mechanics after biomechanical evaluations? Sport Biomech. 2017 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2017.1340508.