Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Rottinger approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique and review of the literature

  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surgical approach utilized in total hip arthroplasty has been identified as a factor that may affect surgical outcomes. There have been many different approaches and modifications used since the procedure was popularized by Sir John Charnley. The popular approaches today can be grouped by their relationship to the trochanter (anterior or posterior), patient position, leg position for dislocation/femoral preparation, and treatment of the abductors and short external rotators. The Rottinger approach is an anterior approach which utilizes the muscle interval between the tensor fascia lata and abductor musculature. The abductor attachments are preserved and the femur is prepared in extension, adduction, and external rotation. This approach has been shown in literature to be safe with some studies showing improved outcomes both in terms of reduced complications and better function than other standard approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Masonis JL, Bourne RB: Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002, 405:46–53. Concise review of commonly used surgical approaches and provides excellent background information.

  2. DeWal H, Su E, DiCesare PE. Instability following total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2003;32:377–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:17–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frndak PA, Mallory TH, and Lombardi AV, Jr.: Translateral surgical approach to the hip. The abductor muscle “split”. Clin Orthop 1993, 135–141.

  5. Mallory TH, Lombardi AV, Jr., Fada RA, et al.: Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach. Clin Orthop 1999, 166–172.

  6. McFarland B, Osborne G. Approach to the hip: a suggested improvement on Kocher’s method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954;36B:364–271.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Osborne R: The approach to the hip: a critical review and a suggested new route. Br J Surg 1930, 18.

  8. Moore A: The Moore self-locking vitallium prosthesis in fresh femoral neck fractures: a new low posterior approach (the southern exposure). American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Instructional Course Lectures 1959, 16.

  9. Judet J, Judet R. The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1950;32B:166–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop. 2005;441:115–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979;95:47–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laffosse JM, Accadbled F, Molinier F, et al.: Anterolateral mini-invasive versus posterior mini-invasive approach for primary total hip replacement. Comparison of exposure and implant positioning. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008, 128:363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang C, Zhu Q, Han Y, et al. Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ir J Med Sci. 2010;179:285–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reininga IH, Zijlstra W, Wagenmakers R, et al. Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernasek TL, Lee WS, Lee HJ, et al. Minimally invasive primary THA: anterolateral intermuscular approach versus lateral transmuscular approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1349–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith-Petersen M: Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949, 31.

  17. Watson-Jones R. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J Surg. 1936;23:787–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. • Bertin KC and Rottinger H: Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop 2004, 248–255. The original description of the technique.

  19. •• Muller M, Tohtz S, Springer I, et al.: Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011, 131:179–189. This is a Level one study.

  20. D’Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, et al. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zati A, Degli E, Spagnoletti C. Does total hip arthroplasty mean sensorial and proprioceptive lesion? A clinical study. Chir Organi Mov. 1997;82:239–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. He X, Tay S, Ling E. Sensory nerve endings in monkey hip joint capsule: a morphological investigation. Clin Anat. 1988;11:81–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Wohlrab D, Droege JW, Mendel T, et al.: Minimally invasive vs. transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study. Orthopade 2008, 37:1121–1126. This is a Level one study.

  24. •• Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S, et al.: Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty 2011, article in press. This is a Level one study.

  25. •• White R.: Early performance of the posterolateral mini approach and the Watson-Jones anterolateral approach- a blinded, randomized clinical trial [abstract]. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting. Las Vegas, Nevada; February 2009. This is a Level one study.

Download references

Disclosure

No conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MD Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Benjamin J. Hansen, Rhett K. Hallows & Scott S. Kelley

  2. North Carolina Orthopedic Clinic, Intermountain Health Care, Durham, NC, USA

    Rhett K. Hallows & Scott S. Kelley

Authors
  1. Benjamin J. Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rhett K. Hallows
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott S. Kelley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott S. Kelley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, B.J., Hallows, R.K. & Kelley, S.S. The Rottinger approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique and review of the literature. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4, 132–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-011-9093-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-011-9093-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation