Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports

  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the extensile nature and familiarity of the standard posterior-lateral approach to the hip, a family of “micro-posterior” approaches has been developed. This family includes the Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (PATH) approach, the Supercapsular (SuperCap) approach and a newer hybrid approach, the Supercapsular Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (SuperPATH) approach. Such approaches should ideally provide a continuum for the surgeon: from a “micro” (external rotator sparing) posterior approach, to a “mini” (external rotator sacrificing) posterior approach, to a standard posterior approach. This could keep a surgeon within his comfort zone during the learning curve of the procedure, while leaving options for complicated reconstructions for the more practiced micro-posterior surgeons. This paper details one author’s experiences utilizing this combined approach, as well as permutations of this entire micro-posterior family of approaches as applied to more complex hip reconstructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •Jewett BA, Collis DK. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):503–7. Recent study citing complications seen with a popular minimally-invasive hip approach.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, Mandereau C, Brzakala V, Dujardin F. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(1):14–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Restrepo C, Mortazavi SM, Brothers J, Parvizi J, Rothman RH. Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):417–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC, Hildebrand M, Berli MC, Walker MR, et al. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches–a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech. 2011;44(3):372–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Oldenrijk J, Hoogland PV, Tuijthof GJ, Corveleijn R, Noordenbos TW, Schafroth MU. Soft tissue damage after minimally invasive THA. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):696–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink B, Mittelstaedt A, Schulz MS, Sebena P, Singer J. Comparison of a minimally invasive posterior approach and the standard posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty a prospective and comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG, Kessler O, Reinthaler A, Krismer M, et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech. 2009;24:812–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parratte S, Pagnano MW. Muscle damage during minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: cadaver-based evidence that it is significant. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:231–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WL. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty. Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP, Trousdale RT. Muscle damage of total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:63–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-A:1153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Procyk S. Initial results with a mini-posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2007;31(Suppl):S17–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sculco TP, Boettner F. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the posterior approach. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:205–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Inaba Y, Dorr LD, Wan Z, Sirainni L, Boutary M. Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:104–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Mumphreys P, O’Brien S, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87-A:701–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini M, Della Valle C, Paprosky W, Rosenberg A. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;429:239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;429:248–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldstein WM, Banson JJ, Berland KA, Gordon AC. Minimal-Incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85-A:33–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: A study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;426:164–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1353–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, Lyman S, Madsen M, Sculco TP. Mini incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled, investigation with 5 year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:538–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. ••Murphy SB. Tissue-Preserving, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a superior capsulotomy. In: Hozack W, editor. Minimally invasive total hip and knee arthroplaty. Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 101–107. Detailed description of the SuperCap technique and clinical rationale.

  25. Murphy SB, Tannast M. Evolution in total hip arthroplasty: computer assisted, minimally invasive techniques combined with alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings. In: D’Antonio J, Dietrich M, editors. Bioceramics in joint arthroplasty. Darmstadt: Steinkopff Verlag; 2005. p. 119–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M. THA performed using conventional and navigated tissue-preserving techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:160–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. ••Murphy SB, Tannast M. Conventional vs minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of rehabilitation and complications. Orthopäde. 2006;(35):761-8. This article is in German with an abstract in English.

  28. ••Penenberg BL, Bolling WS, Riley M. Percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (PATH): a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):209–20. This paper describes the PATH technique and clinical rationale.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. ••Chow J, Kurtz W, Chadha B, Penenberg B, Murphy S. Paper #353: modified superior approach for THA with percutaneous assistance: technique and early results. AAOS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA. February 15–19, 2011. This paper outlines the SuperPATH technique step-by-step and provides a detailed analysis of a single surgeon’s experience through the learning curve of the technique.

Download references

Disclosure

J. Chow: consultant to Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Smith & Nephew; B. Penenberg: patents and royalties from Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; S. Murphy: Consultant to Ceramtec, GmbH; patents and royalties from Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; holds stock/stock options in Surgical Planning Associates, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Chow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chow, J., Penenberg, B. & Murphy, S. Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4, 146–150 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-011-9090-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-011-9090-y

Keywords

Navigation