Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The value of advanced endoscopic techniques in GERD

  • Published:
Current GERD Reports

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common gastrointestinal disorder in the Western world. Proton pump inhibitors are the most important treatment option for these patients. However, some patients are reluctant to take long-term medication. As an alternative, several endoscopic antireflux procedures have been developed. Initial feasibility studies and a few randomized, controlled studies have demonstrated promising results and short-term efficacy, but longer follow-up studies have failed to show a persistent benefit for most of these interventions. Three devices already have been withdrawn because of lack of efficacy or concerns about safety. We conclude that scientific and clinical data on safety, efficacy, and durability are insufficient to support the use of endoscopic therapies for GERD in routine clinical practice. Endoscopic therapies for GERD should be offered only under well-defined study conditions. For now, antisecretory medication remains the standard approach to treat patients with GERD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Kahrilas PJ: Gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA 1996, 276:983–988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeVault KR, Castell DO, American College of Gastroenterology: Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:190–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Malfertheiner P, Hallerback B: Clinical manifestations and complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Int J Clin Pract 2005, 59:346–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, et al.: Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at ten years after surgery. Surg Endosc 2006, 20:159–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, et al.: Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001, 285:2331–2338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Annese V, Caletti G, Cipolletta L, et al.: Endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Endoscopy 2005, 37:470–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iqbal A, Salinas V, Filipi CJ: Endoscopic therapies of gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2006, 12:2641–2655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Richards WO, Scholz S, Khaitan L, et al.: Initial experience with the stretta procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001, 11:267–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahrilas PJ: Radiofrequency therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter for treatment of GERD. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 57:723–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Triadafilopoulos G, Utley DS: Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy delivery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Stretta procedure. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001, 11:333–339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Triadafilopoulos G, DiBaise JK, Nostrant TT, et al.: The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 55:149–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolfsen HC, Richards WO: The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: a registry of 558 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002, 12:395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DiBaise JK, Brand RE, Quigley EM: Endoluminal delivery of radiofrequency energy to the gastroesophageal junction in uncomplicated GERD: efficacy and potential mechanism of action. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:833–842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tam WC, Schoeman MN, Zhang Q, et al.: Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the lower oesophageal sphincter and gastric cardia inhibits transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease. Gut 2003, 52:479–485.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Houston H, Khaitan L, Holzman M, Richards WO: First year experience of patients undergoing the Stretta procedure. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:401–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Corley DA, Katz P, Wo JM, et al.: Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after radiofrequency energy: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2003, 125:668–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Torquati A, Houston HL, Kaiser J, et al.: Long-term follow-up study of the Stretta procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:1475–1479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Go MR, Dundon JM, Karlowicz DJ, et al.: Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the lower esophageal sphincter improves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Surgery 2004, 136:786–794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Triadafilopoulos G: Changes in GERD symptom scores correlate with improvement in esophageal acid exposure after the Stretta procedure. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:1038–1044.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, Dughera L, et al.: Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the gastroesophageal junction (Stretta procedure) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2005, 19:849–853.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lutfi RE, Torquati A, Kaiser J, et al.: Three year’s experience with the Stretta procedure: did it really make a difference? Surg Endosc 2005, 19:289–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arts J, Sifrim D, Rutgeerts P, et al.: Influence of radiofrequency energy delivery at the gastroesophageal junction (the Stretta procedure) on symptoms, acid exposure, and esophageal sensitivity to acid perfusion in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 2007, 52:2170–2177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Noar MD, Lotfi-Emran S: Sustained improvement in symptoms of GERD and antisecretory drug use: 4-year follow-up of the Stretta procedure. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:367–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reymunde A, Santiago N: Long-term results of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of GERD: sustained improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and drug use at 4-year follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:361–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deviere J, Pastorelli A, Louis H, et al.: Endoscopic implantation of a biopolymer in the lower esophageal sphincter for gastroesophageal reflux: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 55:335–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson DA, Ganz R, Aisenberg J, et al.: Endoscopic implantation of Enteryx for treatment of GERD: 12-month results of a prospective, multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:1921–1930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen LB, Johnson DA, Ganz RA, et al.: Enteryx implantation for GERD: expanded multicenter trial results and interim postapproval follow-up to 24 months. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:650–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Deviere J, Costamagna G, Neuhaus H, et al.: Nonresorbable copolymer implantation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized sham-controlled multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:532–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schumacher B, Neuhaus H, Ortner M, et al.: Reduced medication dependency and improved symptoms and quality of life 12 months after Enteryx implantation for gastroesophageal reflux. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005, 39:212–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fockens P, Bruno MJ, Gabbrielli A, et al.: Endoscopic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: multicenter study of the Gatekeeper Reflux Repair System. Endoscopy 2004, 36:682–689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cicala M, Gabbrielli A, Emerenziani S, et al.: Effect of endoscopic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (Gatekeeper reflux repair system) on intraoesophageal dynamic characteristics of acid reflux. Gut 2005, 54:183–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Feretis C, Benakis P, Dimopoulos C, et al.: Endoscopic implantation of Plexiglas (PMMA) microspheres for the treatment of GERD. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:423–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Filipi CJ, Lehman GA, Rothstein RI, et al.: Transoral, flexible endoscopic suturing for treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:416–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mahmood Z, McMahon BP, Arfin Q, et al.: Endocinch therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a one year prospective follow up. Gut 2003, 52:34–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu JJ, Carr-Locke DL, Lee LS, et al.: Endoluminal gastroplication for treatment of patients with classic gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and borderline 24-h pH studies. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004, 39:615–620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tam WC, Holloway RH, Dent J, et al.: Impact of endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction on lower esophageal sphincter function and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:195–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arts J, Lerut T, Rutgeerts P, et al.: A one-year follow-up study of endoluminal gastroplication (Endocinch) in GERD patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2005, 50:351–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Abou-Rebyeh H, Hoepffner N, Rösch T, et al.: Long-term failure of endoscopic suturing in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: a prospective follow-up study. Endoscopy 2005, 37:213–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen YK, Raijman I, Ben-Menachem T, et al.: Long-term outcomes of endoluminal gastroplication: a US multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:659–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schiefke I, Zabel-Langhennig A, Neumann S, et al.: Long term failure of endoscopic gastroplication (EndoCinch). Gut 2005, 54:752–758.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schiefke I, Neumann S, Zabel-Langhenigg A, et al.: Use of an endoscopic suturing device (the “ESD”) to treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, after unsuccessful EndoCinch endoluminal gastroplication: another failure. Endoscopy 2005, 37:700–705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Chuttani R, Sud R, Sachdev G, et al.: A novel endoscopic full-thickness plicator for the treatment of GERD: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 58:770–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pleskow D, Rothstein R, Kozarek R, et al.: Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: long-term multicenter results. Surg Endosc 2007, 21:439–444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwartz MP, Wellink H, Gooszen HG, et al.: Endoscopic gastroplication for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Gut 2007, 56:20–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rothstein R, Filipi C, Caca K, et al.: Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2006, 131:704–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health: Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE). Available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude.html. Accessed September 24, 2007.

  47. Noh KW, Loeb DS, Stockland A, Achem SR: Pneumomediastinum following Enteryx injection for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:723–726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wong RF, Davis TV, Peterson KA: Complications involving the mediastinum after injection of Enteryx for GERD [case report]. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:753–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hogan WJ: Clinical trials evaluating endoscopic GERD treatments. Is it time for a moratorium on the clinical use of these procedures? Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:437–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wakelin DE, Sampliner RE: Endoscopic antireflux procedures: a good wrap? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, 3:831–839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Leipziger Straße 44, 39112, Magdeburg, Germany

    Peter Malfertheiner

Authors
  1. Lucía C. Fry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Klaus Mönkemüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Malfertheiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Malfertheiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fry, L.C., Mönkemüller, K. & Malfertheiner, P. The value of advanced endoscopic techniques in GERD. Curr GERD Rep 1, 241–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12171-007-0024-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12171-007-0024-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation