Skip to main content
Log in

CTO Revascularization

  • Secondary Prevention and Intervention (D.H. Steinberg, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

CTO revascularization has been a topic of ongoing debate because of its high technical complexity and expected benefits. This review focuses on describing the various strategies for CTO revascularization, associated complications, and their outcomes.

Recent Findings

The hybrid algorithm is the most widely used method for CTO revascularization. The various strategies for CTO crossing are as follows: antegrade wire escalation (AWE), antegrade dissection/re-entry (ADR), and retrograde approach. DECISION-CTO, EURO-CTO, and EXPLORE are the three large randomized trials that studied the impact of complete revascularization with CTO-PCI and conclude that successful CTO-PCI is non-inferior to medical therapy.

Summary

CTO revascularization is a very challenging and complex procedure with a higher risk of complications compared to non-CTO revascularization. With the development of techniques like hybrid algorithm, use of specialized guide wires, drug-eluting stents with low risk of in-stent restenosis, and increased training of operators with increasing procedural volumes, the overall benefits of CTO-PCI revascularization are higher than the complications. CTO-PCI not only can improve overall mortality and survival but also improves angina, reduces burden of ventricular arrhythmia, and reduces the need for subsequent CABG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Yang JH, Kim BS, Jang WJ, Ahn J, Park TK, Song YB, et al. Optimal medical therapy vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with coronary chronic total occlusion - a propensity-matched analysis. Circ J. 2016;80(1):211–7. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, Galbraith PD, Osherov AB, Yalonetsky S, et al. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(11):991–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alessandrino G, Chevalier B, Lefevre T, Sanguineti F, Garot P, Unterseeh T, et al. A clinical and angiographic scoring system to predict the probability of successful first-attempt percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with total chronic coronary occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(12):1540–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Jaffer FA, Yeh RW, Patel M, et al. The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(14):1325–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joyal D, Afilalo J, Rinfret S. Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2010;160(1):179–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Azzalini L, Jolicoeur EM, Pighi M, Millan X, Picard F, Tadros VX, et al. Epidemiology, management strategies, and outcomes of patients with chronic total coronary occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118(8):1128–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, Kimura T, Hayashi Y, Muramatsu T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (multicenter CTO registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(2):213–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. • Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Yan AT, Hanratty CG, Bagnall AJ, Egred M, et al. Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Heart. 2016;102(18):1486–93. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308891This reference explains hybrid algorithm which describes the approach for crossing CTO lesions. Implementation of hybrid algorithm has significantly improved the success rates of CTO-PCI.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christakopoulos GE, Christopoulos G, Carlino M, Jeroudi OM, Roesle M, Rangan BV, et al. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(10):1367–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SW, Lee PH, Ahn JM, Park DW, Yun SC, Han S, et al. Randomized trial evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of chronic total occlusion. Circulation. 2019;139(14):1674–83. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.031313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, Wyman RM, Burke MN, Karmpaliotis D, et al. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(4):367–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saeed B, Kandzari DE, Agostoni P, Lombardi WL, Rangan BV, Banerjee S, et al. Use of drug-eluting stents for chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77(3):315–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma V, Wilson W, Smith W, McEntegart M, Oldroyd K, Sidik N, et al. Comparison of characteristics and complications in men versus women undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(4):535–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia S, Abdullah S, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Chronic total occlusions: patient selection and overview of advanced techniques. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15(2):334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0334-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenzo A, Enrico P, Mohamed A, Soledad O, Carlo Z, Alessio La M, et al. Coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(9):e804–e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Lamee R, Ielasi A, Latib A, Godino C, Ferraro M, Mussardo M, et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4(1):87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henriques JP, Hoebers LP, Ramunddal T, Laanmets P, Eriksen E, Bax M, et al. Percutaneous intervention for concurrent chronic total occlusions in patients with STEMI: the EXPLORE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(15):1622–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. •• Tajti P, Brilakis ES. Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence and controversies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(2):e006732. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006732This article discusses three large randomized controlled trials which compare CTO-PCI to medical therapy in patients with coronary CTOs.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Valenti R, Migliorini A, Signorini U, Vergara R, Parodi G, Carrabba N, et al. Impact of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention on survival in patients with at least one chronic total occlusion. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(19):2336–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan MF, Wendel CS, Thai HM, Movahed MR. Effects of percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(1):95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jang WJ, Yang JH, Choi S-H, Song YB, Hahn J-Y, Choi J-H, et al. Long-term survival benefit of revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion and well-developed collateral circulation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015;8(2):271–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang ZK, Zhang RY, Hu J, Zhang Q, Ding FH, Shen WF. Impact of successful staged revascularization of a chronic total occlusion in the non-infarct-related artery on long-term outcome in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165(1):76–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anbukarasi Maran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Shailee Shah, Jeffery Yourshaw, and Anbukarasi Maran declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Secondary Prevention and Intervention

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, S.Y., Yourshaw, J. & Maran, A. CTO Revascularization. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 14, 25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-020-00662-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-020-00662-4

Keywords

Navigation