Parity, Job Strain, and Cardiovascular Risk in the Women’s Health Study
Purpose of Review
Pregnancy and employment are critical life events that can affect chronic disease risk in women. Hence, we examined the relationship between parity and cardiovascular risk, and whether job stress affected this association.
Cox proportional hazard models examined the association of parity with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk [myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery revascularization, ischemic stroke, and CVD death] in 23,905 participants in the Women’s Health Study. Parity was defined at baseline as pregnancy lasting > 6 months gestation, categorized as none (referent), 1–2, 3–4, and 5+. Job strain assessed at year 5 was operationalized using the Karasek job strain model, and job insecurity was defined based on the item “My job security is good” (yes or no). The mean age of the women at baseline was 57.3 ± 5.2 years with an average follow-up for CVD of 16 years. In models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, income, education, CVD risk factors, and age of menarche, increasing parity was associated with increased CVD risk compared to no pregnancies [hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15, 0.94–1.41 (1–2 pregnancies); 1.29, 1.06–1.58 (3–4 pregnancies); 1.52, 1.20–1.93 (5+ pregnancies)]. Further adjustment for job strain did not attenuate the noted relationship (HR, 95% CI 1.15, 0.94–1.41 (1–2 pregnancies); 1.30, 1.06–1.58 (3–4 pregnancies); 1.52, 1.20–1.93 (5+ pregnancies). There was no significant interaction between job strain (p = 0.68) or job insecurity (p = 0.97) and parity.
Among working women, increased parity was related to heightened CVD risk, a relationship that was not attenuated by job strain or job insecurity.
KeywordsPregnancy Cardiovascular disease Job stress Parity
We would like to thank the participants of the Women’s Health Study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Eva M. Durazo, Tomás Cabeza de Baca, Natalie Slopen, Nisha I. Parikh, Julie E. Buring, Robert J. Glynn, and Michelle A. Albert declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.Women in the labor force: A databook. US Bur Labor Stat Rep. 2014;1052:1–107.Google Scholar
- 2.Table 5. Employment status of the population by sex, marital status, and presence and age of own children under 18, 2014–2015 annual averages [Internet]. Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2015 [cited 2016 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.t05.htm
- 3.• Slopen N, Glynn RJ, Buring JE, Lewis TT, Williams DR, Albert MA. Job strain, job insecurity, and incident cardiovascular disease in the Women’s Health Study: results from a 10-year prospective study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40512. In this prospective study, Slopen et al. showcased that psychosocial factors, such as job strain, played a considerable role in the incident risk of cardiovascular disease among women CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.• Ness RB, Harris T, Cobb J, Flegal KM, Kelsey JL, Balanger A, et al. Number of pregnancies and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1528–33. In their landmark study, Ness et al. were able to support the parity and cardiovascular disease association using a large sample of physician-validated cardiovascular endpoints CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kivimäki M, Kawachi I. Work stress as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(9):74.Google Scholar
- 11.Jacobs AS, Bailey Z, Albert MA. Job burnout, job stress and cardiovascular disease. In: Nanda NC, Kesser N, editors. Heart disease in women. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2015.Google Scholar
- 15.Larsen AD, Schlünssen V, Christensen BH, Peter BJ, Obel C, Thulstrup AM, et al. Exposure to psychosocial job strain during pregnancy and odds of asthma and atopic dermatitis among 7-year old children—a prospective cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40:639–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Karasek RA, Theorell T. Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic books; 1992.Google Scholar
- 24.Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of menarcheal age to obesity in childhood and adulthood: the Bogalusa heart study. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3Google Scholar
- 28.Vladutiu CJ, Siega-Riz AM, Sotres-Alvarez D, Stuebe AM, Ni A, Tabb KM, et al. Parity and components of the metabolic syndrome among US Hispanic/Latina women: results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S62–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Ziomkiewicz A, Sancilio A, Galbarczyk A, Klimek M, Jasienska G, Bribiescas RG. Evidence for the cost of reproduction in humans: high lifetime reproductive effort is associated with greater oxidative stress in post-menopausal women. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0145753.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Lawlor DA, Emberson JR, Ebrahim S, Whincup PH, Wannamethee SG, Walker M, et al. Is the association between parity and coronary heart disease due to biological effects of pregnancy or adverse lifestyle risk factors associated with child-rearing?: findings from the British Women’s Heart and Health Study and the British Regional Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107:1260–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.• Magnus MC, Iliodromiti S, Lawlor DA, Catov JM, Nelson SM, Fraser A. Number of offspring and cardiovascular disease risk in men and women: the role of shared lifestyle characteristics. Epidemiology 2017;1. Using a prospective sample of men and women, Magnus and colleagues tested potential cardiometabolic and lifestyle mechanisms as explanations for the parity-CVD relationship.Google Scholar