Skip to main content
Log in

The Obesity Paradox in Heart Failure: What Is Real Obesity in Heart Failure?

  • Obesity + Diet (G. Rao, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The obesity is a conventional cardiovascular risk factor. Obesity has detrimental effects on heart failure, but has been found to be paradoxically associated with improved survival. The obesity paradox remains controversial in the literatures. There are various underlying mechanisms to explain the obesity paradox in heart failure. Epidemiologic, biochemical, animal studies revealed this unexpected phenomenon, which was described as an obesity paradox. BMI does not provide information body composition and cardiopulmonary fitness status, which can be related to obesity paradox. Still, the obesity paradox is controversial; therefore, intentional weight gaining may not be recommended. Many researches related to obesity paradox have been introduced and further research needs to be done in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. James PA et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311(5):507–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2014 Update, AHA Statistical Update. Circulation. 2014;129(3):28–292.

  3. Anderson I, R. B, Connolly M, Al-Yaman F, Bjertness E, King A, et al. Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health (The Lancet-Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. Lancet. 2016; 388(6):131–157.

  4. Lavie CJ, D.S. A, Parto P, Jahangir E, Kokkinos P, Ortega FB, et al. Obesity and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and prognosis-the obesity paradox updated. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58(5);537–547.

  5. Argolo D, Iyengar N, Hudis C. Obesity and cancer: concepts and challenges. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2015;6(4):390–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lavie C, Milani R, Ventura H. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(21):1925–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barry V et al. Fitness vs. fatness on all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(4):382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lavie C et al. Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on the obesity paradox in patients with heart failure. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(3):251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel S, et al. Obesity and its relation with diabetes and hypertension: a cross-sectional study across 4 geographical regions. Glob Heart. 2016;11(1):71–79.e4.

  10. Lee JA, Laurson KR. Obesity and insulin resistance screening tools in American adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2010. Can J Diab. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.11.009.

  11. Zamora E, et al. Weight loss in obese patients with heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(3). Weight reduction is a vague concept because only body weight doesn’t reflect body composition and loss of weight is not always associated with fat reduction. So, this article provides clear explanation regarding obesity paradox as well as cardiopulmonary fitness. It leads readers to understand relationship between cardiopulmonary fitness and obesity paradox.

  12. Hainer V. Obesity paradox does exist. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(2):276–81.

  13. Burchfield JS, Xie M, Hill JA. Pathological ventricular remodeling: mechanisms: part 1 of 2. Circulation. 2013;128(4):388–400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y. Epigenetics and obesity cardiomyopathy: from pathophysiology to prevention and management. Pharmacol Therapeut. 2016;161:52–66.

  15. Diong C, J.P., Tsuchimochi H, Gray EA, Hughes G, Inagaki T, et al. Sympathetic hyper-excitation in obesity and pulmonary hypertension: physiological relevance to the ‘obesity paradox’. Int J Obes. 2016;40(6):938–46.

  16. Ebong IA, G. D J, Rodriguez CJ, Chen H, Bertoni AG. Mechanisms of heart failure in obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014;8(6):540–8.

  17. Ehl N et al. Diabetes reduces left ventricular ejection fraction–irrespective of presence and extent of coronary artery disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(6):945–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmadi SF, S. E, Zahmatkesh G, Streja D, Kashyap M, Moradi H, et al. Reverse epidemiology of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in the geriatric population. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(11):933–9.

  19. Petyaev IM. Lycopene deficiency in ageing and cardiovascular disease. Oxidat Med Cellul Long. 2016;6:6.

  20. De Gennaro L, B. N, Correale M, Buquicchio F, Caldarola P, Di Biase M. Statin therapy in heart failure: for good, for bad, or indifferent? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014;16(1):377.

  21. Yeung CK, B. F, Claessens AJ, Roshanravan B, Linke L, Sundell MB, et al. Coenzyme Q10 dose-escalation study in hemodialysis patients: safety, tolerability, and effect on oxidative stress. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:183.

  22. Takiguchi M et al. Impact of body mass index on mortality in heart failure patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014;44(12):1197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jorge AS, A. J, Paraíso AF, Jorge GC, Silveira CM, de Souza LR, et al. Body mass index and the visceral adipose tissue expression of IL-6 and TNF-alpha are associated with the morphological severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in individuals with class III obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016;16:1871–403.

  24. Haufe S et al. Differential response of the natriuretic peptide system to weight loss and exercise in overweight or obese patients. J Hypertens. 2015;33(7):1458–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hilzendeger A et al. A brain leptin-renin angiotensin system interaction in the regulation of sympathetic nerve activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;303(2):H197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. De Schutter A et al. Obesity paradox and the heart: which indicator of obesity best describes this complex relationship? Curr Opinion Clin Nutr Metabol Care. 2013;16(5):517–24. Most of clinicians still recommended beneficial effect on weight reduction; however, chronic heart failure patients showed higher mortality in patients who lost their weight. It suggests that cardiologists need to know how to manage heart failure patients’ body weight in their practice.

  27. Ritzel A et al. Impact of lifestyle modification on left ventricular function and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction and cardiometabolic syndrome: a prospective interventional study. Acta Cardiol. 2015;70(1):43–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Clark AL, F. GC, Horwich TB. Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on the obesity paradox in patients with systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:209–13.

  29. Lavie CJ, S. A, Alpert MA, De Schutter A, Lopez-Jimenez F, Milani RV, et al. Update on obesity and obesity paradox in heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58(5):393–40. This article deals with obesity paradox thoroughly, and it gives excellent explanation from obesity paradox physiology to clinical significance. Readers will get good insight about obesity paradox.

  30. Pureza V, Florea V. Mechanisms for cachexia in heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2013;10(4):307–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Valero Muñoz M, et al. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction induces beiging in adipose tissue. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(1):e002724.

  32. Padwal R et al. The obesity paradox in heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014;38(8):1110–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. De Schutter A et al. Obesity paradox and the heart: which indicator of obesity best describes this complex relationship? Curr Opinion Clin Nutr Metabol Care. 2013;16(5):517–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gonzalez MC, P CA, Orlandi SP, Heysmfield SB. Obesity paradox in cancer: new insights provided by body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(5):999–1005.

  35. Lavie CJ, M RV, Ventura HO. Disparate effects of metabolically healthy obesity in coronary heart disease and heart failure. J Am Colleg Cardiol. 2014;63(11):1079–81.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Seok Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Drs Lee, Visco, Mushiyev, Pekler, Savadkar, Cativo, and Reyes Garay have no conflicts of interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Obesity + Diet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H.S., Visco, F., Mushiyev, S. et al. The Obesity Paradox in Heart Failure: What Is Real Obesity in Heart Failure?. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 10, 28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-016-0510-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-016-0510-9

Keywords

Navigation