Environmental Determinants of Smoking Behaviors: The Role of Policy and Environmental Interventions in Preventing Smoking Initiation and Supporting Cessation
- 470 Downloads
Tobacco control strategies have contributed to substantial declines in smoking in the United States. However, smoking still remains the single largest preventable cause of disease and premature deaths in the country. Despite the continuing challenges of implementing tobacco control strategies and the pervasive influence of the tobacco industry to undermine such strategies, there are now unprecedented opportunities to prevent smoking initiation, facilitate cessation, and protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke. In this paper, we briefly review the most recent literature discussing key strategies that have proven effective in tobacco control including regulations on marketing and sales of tobacco products, taxation, and smoke-free legislation. We focused on these 3 tobacco control strategies because of their potential to positively influence the environment of both minors and adults regardless of their smoking status. Although research has identified significant individual and social predictors of tobacco use, environmental influences are also important risk factors for tobacco use.
KeywordsTobacco control Smoking prevention Smoke-free policy Tobacco product taxation Tobacco advertising Smoking initiation Built environment Smoking cessation
WAC was supported by The University of Texas School of Public Health Cancer Education and Career Development Program – National Cancer Institute / NIH Grant R25CA57712. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the offıcial views of the National Cancer Institute or the NIH.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
William A. Calo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Sarah Krasny declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1226–8.Google Scholar
- 4.American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2013.Google Scholar
- 6.• Hyland A, Barnoya J, Corral JE. Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future. Tob Control. 2012;21:154–61. This paper summarizes the evolution of smoke-free policies, highlights the research underlying such policies, and examines factors that have contributed to their adoption. The authors also speculate on what the smoke-free policies of the future may look like. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Institute of Medicine. Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2007.Google Scholar
- 11.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: summary of national findings, NSDUH Series H-41, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11-4658. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2011.Google Scholar
- 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cigarette use among high school students - United States, 1991–2009. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:797–801.Google Scholar
- 16.Agaku IT, yo-Yusuf OA, Vardavas CI, et al. Use of conventional and novel smokeless tobacco products among US adolescents. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e578–86.Google Scholar
- 17.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012.Google Scholar
- 21.National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008. NIH Pub. No. 07-6242.Google Scholar
- 28.•• Ribisl KM. Research gaps related to tobacco product marketing and sales in the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14:43–53. This paper examined several provisions in the FSPTCA related to the sales and marketing of tobacco products. The author provided a description and brief history of key regulations, what is known about these regulatory strategies, and research opportunities. Of the ideas presented, the author highlighted the following 5 areas of policy opportunity: curtailing cigarette price promotions and discounts, reducing tobacco retailer density, reducing youth exposure to tobacco marketing online and at the point of sale, reducing tax avoidance, and restricting advertising and promotion at the state level with the lifting of federal preemption. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.• Dube SR, Arrazola RA, Lee J, et al. Pro-tobacco influences and susceptibility to smoking cigarettes among middle and high school students–United States, 2011. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S45–51. This study assesses the proportion of susceptible middle and high school students who are exposed to pro-tobacco advertisements through stores, magazines, and the Internet. Despite provisions from the FSPTCA that seek to limit the exposure to and appeal of tobacco advertisements among youth, the study found that middle and high school students continue to be exposed to pro-tobacco advertisements in stores, magazines, and the Internet. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Morgenstern M, Sargent JD, Isensee B, Hanewinkel R. From never to daily smoking in 30 months: the predictive value of tobacco and non-tobacco advertising exposure. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002907.Google Scholar
- 35.Supreme Court lets FDA move forward with graphic cigarette warnings and other tobacco regulations. Available at http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/press_releases/post/2013_04_22_scotus. Accessed August 2013.
- 36.•• Luke DA, Ribisl KM, Smith C, Sorg AA. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act: banning outdoor tobacco advertising near schools and playgrounds. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:295–302. This study uses spatial analyses to examine how the FSPTCA rules banning outdoor tobacco advertising near schools and playgrounds would affect tobacco retailers in New York and Missouri given different tobacco free buffer zones (350-, 500- and 1000- feet). Given that similar rules on tobacco-free buffer zones around schools and playgrounds have been deemed unconstitutional, this analysis is important because it gives the FDA reliable data on which to base the new rules that it issues. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. Overview List – How many smokefree laws? Available at http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/mediaordlist.pdf. Accessed August 2013.
- 42.Johns M, Sacks R, Rane M, Kansagra SM. Exposure to tobacco retail outlets and smoking initiation among New York City adolescents. J Urban Health. 2013; [In press].Google Scholar
- 43.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State cigarette excise taxes - United States, 2010–2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:201–4.Google Scholar
- 44.• Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control. 2012;21:172–80. This review presents an overview of the different types of tobacco taxes and tax structures used by governments around the world, and discusses how these taxes impact on the prices of tobacco products. The authors also discussed “best practices” for using tobacco taxes for tobacco control. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.•• Xu X, Pesko MF, Tynan MA, et al. Cigarette price-minimization strategies by U.S. smokers. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44:472–6. This research found that cigarette price minimization strategies are practiced widely (prevalence of 55.4%) among current adult smokers in the United States and resulting price reductions are relatively large (a reduction of $1.27 per pack or 22.0%). The authors also provide these estimates for all 50 states and DC.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Pesko MF, Licht AS, Kruger JM. Cigarette price minimization strategies in the United States: price reductions and responsiveness to excise taxes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; [In press].Google Scholar
- 55.Fix BV, Hyland A, O’Connor RJ, et al. A novel approach to estimating the prevalence of untaxed cigarettes in the USA: findings from the 2009 and 2010 international tobacco control surveys. Tob Control. 2013; [In press].Google Scholar
- 58.Choi K, Hennrikus DJ, Forster JL, Moilanen M. Receipt and redemption of cigarette coupons, perceptions of cigarette companies and smoking cessation. Tob Control. 2012; [In press].Google Scholar
- 61.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General—Executive Summary. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2006.Google Scholar
- 70.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State preemption of local smoke-free laws in government work sites, private work sites, and restaurants - United States, 2005–2009. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:105–8.Google Scholar
- 71.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC grand rounds: current opportunities in tobacco control. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:487–92.Google Scholar