Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Optimization of a Reversed-Phase HPLC Method to Separate Pulse Proteins

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the demand for new sources of non-GMO and allergen-free plant proteins in food formulations that have not previously existed, there is a growing need for analytical methods to characterize these proteins. A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method was developed and optimized to separate the proteins from yellow pea, lentil, chickpea, great northern beans, and a commercial pea protein isolate. A response surface methodology (RSM) model was used for final method optimization. The optimized separation conditions were 0.089% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B) with a gradient of 20% B to 30% B for 10 min, 30% B to 39% B for 20 min, 39% B to 60% B for 10 min, and keeping 60% B for the last 5 min of the run. The optimized sample concentration was 12.8 mg/mL, using a C18 column at 55.5 °C. These conditions for yellow pea sample resulted in a good resolution (116 peaks with model predictability of 0.96) and high recovery (106% recovery with model predictability of 0.92). It was shown that the optimized method has great potential to be used for quantitation of total protein content in pulse samples using pea protein isolate as a standard (R2 of 0.9985 for the standard curve), and values obtained using this method were comparable with those obtained through nitrogen combustion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agilent (2020) Intact & subunit analysis, Poroshell 300. https://www.agilent.com/en/product/biopharma-hplc-analysis/intact-subunit-analysis/poroshell-300 (accessed 23 March 2020)

  • Aguilar MI (2004) HPLC of peptides and proteins, basic theory and methodology. In: Aguilar MI (ed) HPLC of peptides and proteins: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • American laboratory, Challenging Chromatographic Peak Integration. https://www.americanlaboratory.com/914-Application-Notes/509-Challenging-Chromatographic-Peak-Integration/, 2010 (accessed 03 January 2020)

  • Arntfield SD, Maskus HD (2011) Peas and other legume proteins. In: Philips PA, Williams PA (eds) Handbook of food proteins. Woodhead Publishing, Philadelphia, pp 233–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bean SR, Ioerger BP, Blackwell DL (2011) Separation of kafirins on surface porous reversed- phase high-performance liquid chromatography columns. J Agric Food Chem:85–91

  • Bobaly B, Mikola V, Sipko E, Marta Z, Fekete J (2015) Recovery of proteins affected by mobile phase trifluoroacetic acid concentration in reversed-phase chromatography. J Chromatogr Sci 53:1078–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YW, Alli I, Molina AT, Konishi Y, Boye JI (2012) Isolation and characterization of chickpea (Cicer arietinum l.) seed protein fractions. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:618–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Mehok AR, Mant CT, Hodges RS (2004) Optimum concentration of trifluoroacetic acid for reversed-phase liquid chromatography of peptides revisited. J Chromatogr A 1043:9–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DePalma K, Smith B, McDonald AG (2019) Effect of processing conditions, biochemical properties, and microstructure on tofu production from yellow field peas (Pisum sativum). J Food Sci 84:3463–3472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eschelbach JW, Jorgenson JW (2006) Improved protein recovery in reversed-phase liquid chromatography by the use of ultrahigh pressures. Anal Chem 78:1697–1706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcıa MC, Hogenboom AC, Zappey H, Irth H (2002) Effect of the mobile phase composition on the separation and detection of intact proteins by reversed-phase liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 957:187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada T, Tanaka H, Izumine H, Ohira M (2004) Evaluation of an embedded polar C4 phase for hydrophobic protein analysis by reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1043:27–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn MTW, Quirino JP, Whisstock J, Terabe S (2002) Thermal unfolding of proteins studied by coupled reversed-phase HPLC-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry techniques based on isotope exchange effects. Anal Chem 74:1467–1475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein GE, Vrona SA, Wechsler RJ, Steadman BL, Lewis RV, Middaugh CR (1986) Role of conformational changes in the elution of proteins from reversed-phase HPLC columns. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA:4268–4272

  • Lee HC, Htoon AK, Uthayakumaran S, Paterson JL (2007) Chemical and functional quality of protein isolated from alkaline extraction of Australian lentil cultivars: Matilda and Digger. Food Chem 102:1199–1207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linghu Z, Karim F, Taghvaei M, Smith JS (2019) Determination of heterocyclic amines in meat matrices using enhanced matrix removal-lipid extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Food Sci 84:1992–2002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent KD, Burton WG, Slattery TK, Johnson BF, Snyder LR (1988) Separation of proteins by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography ii. Optimizing sample pretreatment and mobile phase conditions. J Chromatogr A 443:381–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrysiak E, Smith DM, Smith BM, Ganjyal GM (2018) Enhanced functionality of pea-rice protein isolate blends through direct steam injection processing. Food Chem 243:338–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shibue M, Mant CT, Hodges RS (2005) Effect of anionic ion-pairing reagent concentration (1–60 mM) on reversed-phase liquid chromatography elution behavior of peptides. J Chromatogr A:58–67

  • Smith BM, Ramsay SA, Roe A, Ferrante MJ, Brooks S (2019) Reducing visual differences in whole grain bread prepared with hard red and hard white wheat: application for sensory studies. J Food Sci accepted.

  • Sturaro A, De Marchi M, Masi A, Cassandro M (2016) Quantification of whey proteins by reversed phase-HPLC and effectiveness of mid-infrared spectroscopy for their rapid prediction in sweet whey. J Dairy Sci 99:68–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turula VE, de Haseth JA (1996) Particle beam LC/FT-IR spectrometry studies of biopolymer conformations in reversed-phase HPLC separations: native globular proteins. Anal Chem:629–638

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) as part of the Pulse Crop Health Initiative (project number 3060-21650-001-00-D).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brennan Smith.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Mostafa Taghvaei declares that he has no conflict of interest. Brennan Smith declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No aspect of this article contains research involving human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taghvaei, M., Smith, B. Development and Optimization of a Reversed-Phase HPLC Method to Separate Pulse Proteins. Food Anal. Methods 13, 1482–1491 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01771-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01771-x

Keywords

Navigation