Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of Fruit Pulp Adulteration Using Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of NIR, MIR and Data Fusion Performance

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed at developing control charts and classification models to investigate sugar and water addition in guava pulp applying near- and mid-infrared (NIR and MIR) spectroscopies and low-level data fusion to compare performance of them. The pulp was produced in a pilot plant (authentic samples) during the harvest season in São Paulo (Brazil), and part of samples was adulterated with sugar or water. Authentic and adulterated samples were analyzed by NIR and MIR. The spectra data obtained were preprocessed, and the principal component analysis was applied. MIR spectra data presents a fingerprint region, which is an important tool to differ authentic and adulterated samples. Control charts and classification models (SIMCA, k-NN, and PLS-DA), which were authenticated by external validation, were used to discriminate authentic from adulterated samples (sugar or water in different concentrations). It was possible to differentiate adulterated from authentic samples through control charts, except for water-adulterated samples using NIR spectral. The models presented excellent values of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and efficiency. However, k-NN presented better performance. The results obtained by data fusion presented worse performance than the models based in only one of the techniques. Therefore, these results suggested that NIR and MIR techniques can be used for adulteration detection; however, MIR control charts and k-NN models are more effective to detect sugar or water adulteration in guava pulp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank FAPESP (Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo—process: grant number: 2015/15848-0) and CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—finance code 001) for the financial support.

Funding

This study was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), grant number 2015/15848-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana A. L. Pallone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Priscila D. Alamar declares that she has no conflict of interest. Elem T. S Caramês declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ronei J. Poppi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Juliana A. Lima Pallone declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alamar, P.D., Caramês, E.T.S., Poppi, R.J. et al. Detection of Fruit Pulp Adulteration Using Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of NIR, MIR and Data Fusion Performance. Food Anal. Methods 13, 1357–1365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01755-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01755-x

Keywords

Navigation