Development of a Suspect Screening Strategy for Pesticide Metabolites in Fruit and Vegetables by UPLC-Q-Tof-MS
- 341 Downloads
A multi-pesticide metabolite screening method using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-Tof-MS) was developed for the detection of pesticide metabolites in fruit and vegetable samples. Based on a retrospectively created accurate mass compound database, a suspect screening approach was established for pesticides of high concern applied to a wide scope of plant-derived commodities. For each matrix, an individual scope of characteristic pesticides was selected and a scientific library of corresponding metabolites generated. The metabolite database contained a total of 648 pesticide metabolites originating from 58 active compounds. In 500 samples from daily routine analysis, 96 samples with positive detects for a total of 26 pesticides were re-analyzed for the occurrence of corresponding metabolites. Forty-seven different phase-I and phase-II metabolites were identified, respectively. The developed metabolite database can be applied for a suspect screening approach for pesticide metabolites identification in all kinds of fruits and vegetables. By the means of the results of the suspect screening workflow, a targeted screening method by UHPLC-MS/MS was established for individual pesticide metabolites. Positive detects for metabolites may give an unequivocal evidence for an illegal application of plant protection products, even if the active compound is not detectable anymore.
KeywordsPesticides Metabolites Suspect screening LC-Q-Tof-MS
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Anna Bauer declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jens Luetjohann declares that she has no conflict of interest. Sascha Rohn declares that she has no conflict of interest. Eckard Jantzen declares that he has no conflict of interest. Jürgen Kuballa declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Bauer A, Luetjohann J, Hanschen FS, Schreiner M, Kuballa J, Jantzen E, Rohn S (2017) Identification and characterization of pesticide metabolites in Brassica species by liquid chromatography travelling wave ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-TWIMS-QTOF-MS). Food Chem 244:292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BVL Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety—(2017) Database of plant protection products. https://apps2.bvl.bund.de/psm/jsp/index.jsp. Accessed 25 August 2017
- CEN method 15662—DIN EN 15662:2009-02 (2008) Foods of plant origin—determination of pesticide residues using GC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS following acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and clean-up by dispersive SPE—QuEChERS-method; German version EN 15662:2008Google Scholar
- Collin College (2017). http://iws.collin.edu/biopage/faculty/mcculloch/1406/notes/cell/images/cenvac2.jpg. Accessed 16 September 2017
- EFSA (2009) European food safety authority—provision of documents (07/08/2009) assessment report Azoxystrobin, UKGoogle Scholar
- EFSA European Food Safety Authority (2003) metrafenon_DAR_05. Draft Report Assessment:239Google Scholar
- EFSA European Food Safety Authority (2005) Cyprodinil existing (2nd stage). Draft Assessment ReportGoogle Scholar
- EU—Pesticides database (2016) Pesticides EU-MRLs regulation (EC) no 396/2005: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=product.selection&language=EN
- European Commission (2015) Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feedGoogle Scholar
- Gautam M, Etzerodt T, Fomsgaard IS (2017) Quantification of azoxystrobin and identification of two novel metabolites in lettuce via liquid chromatography–quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP) mass spectrometry. Int J Environ Anal Chem 97(5):419–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2017.1318867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kiljanek T, Niewiadowska A, Semeniuk S, Gawel M, Borzecka M, Posyniak A (2016) Multi-residue method for the determination of pesticides and pesticide metabolites in honeybees by liquid and gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry—honeybee poisoning incidents. J Chromatogr A 1435:100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.01.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- López MG, Fussell RJ, Stead SL, Roberts D, McCullagh M, Rao R (2014) Evaluation and validation of an accurate mass screening method for the analysis of pesticides in fruits and vegetables using liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time of flight-mass spectrometry with automated detection. J Chromatogr A 1373:40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moschet C, Piazzoli A, Singer H, Hollender J (2013) Alleviating the reference standard dilemma using a systematic exact mass suspect screening approach with liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 85(21):10312–10320. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4021598 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pramanik BN, Chen G, Lee MS (2011) Characterization of impurities and degradants using mass spectrometry. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470921371
- Storck V, Lucini L, Mamy L, Ferrari F, Papadopoulou ES, Nikolaki S, Karas PA, Servien R, Karpouzas DG, Trevisan M, Benoit P, Martin-Laurent F (2016) Identification and characterization of tebuconazole transformation products in soil by combining suspect screening and molecular typology. Environ Pollut 208(Pt B):537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar