Fluorescence Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics for the Investigation of the Adulteration of Essential Oils
- 194 Downloads
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were built with excitation-emission matrix fluorescence (EEMF) spectra of essential oils for the investigation of their adulteration. With self-organized maps (SOMs), the clusters formed by all the types of essential oils were visualized. Pure essential oils were globally separated from their adulterated samples. The nature of the adulterant (vegetable oil, essential oil, solvent) in adulterated essential oils was revealed by a multilayer perceptron (MLP) network which classified them with a percentage of correct classification of 92.31%. In the case of the adulteration of neroli essential oil by sunflower vegetable oil, with another multilayer perceptron network, the level of adulteration was globally well evaluated. The correlation coefficient between true and evaluated adulteration percentages was 0.951. The samples corresponding to the adulteration percentage of 5% were the worse evaluated.
KeywordsEssential oils Adulteration Excitation-emission matrix fluorescence Artificial neural networks
The authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work, through NET-45 and OEA-AC-71 projects, by the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP, Trieste, Italy). The authors also thank Professor Souad Lahmar for providing the best conditions for the accomplishment of this work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
William Mbogning Feudjio declares that he has no conflict of interest. Hassen Ghalila declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mama Nsangou declares that he has no conflict of interest. Youssef Majdi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yvon Mbesse Kongbonga declares that he has no conflict of interest. Nejmeddine Jaïdane declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. CLARENDON PRESS, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Boren KE, Young DG, Woolley CL, Smith BL, Carlson RE (2015) Detecting essential oil adulteration. J Env Anal ChemGoogle Scholar
- Bun Ng T, Fei Fang E, El-Din Ahmed Bekhit A, Ho Wong J (2016) Methods for the characterization, authentication, and adulteration of essential oils. In: Preedy V (ed) Essential oils in food preservation. Flavor and Safety. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, pp 11–17Google Scholar
- Burfield T (2003) The adulteration of essential oils and the consequences to aromatherapy & natural perfumery practice. http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~nodice/new/magazine/october/october/october.htm/ Accessed 20 April 2016
- Djilani A, Dicko A (2012) The therapeutic benefits of essential oils. In: Bouayed J (ed) Nutrition, well-being and health. InTech, Rijeka, pp 155–178Google Scholar
- Gowthamarajan K, Kulkarni GT, Subburaju T (2005) Aroma oils as cosmeceutical. Nat Prod Radiance 4:335–338Google Scholar
- Madan MM, Singhal RS, Kulkarni PR (1996) An approach into the detection of authenticity of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) oleoresin. J Spices Aromat Crops 5:64–67Google Scholar
- Nawrocka A, Lamorska J (2013) Determination of food quality by using spectroscopic methods. In: Grundas S, Stepniewski A (eds) Advances in Agrophysical research. Intech, Rijeka, pp 347–367Google Scholar
- Sikorska E, Khmelinskii I, Sikorski M (2012) Analysis of olive oils by fluorescence spectroscopy: methods and applications. In: Boskou D (ed) Olive oil - constituents, quality. Health Properties and Bioconversions. Intech, Rijeka, pp 63–88Google Scholar
- Zellner B’A, Dugo P, Dugo G, Mondello L (2010) Analysis of essential oils. In: Başer KHC, Buchbauer G (eds) Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology, and Applications. Taylor & Francis Group Inc, Boca Raton, pp 151–183Google Scholar