Determination of Pesticide Residues in Mango Matrices by Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
- 196 Downloads
This study describes an accurate mass measurement of pesticide residues (n = 68) in mango matrices by liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS). The proposed methodology is based on liquid-liquid extraction with a mixture of 25:75 (v/v) acetonitrile/ethyl acetate followed by dispersive solid phase extraction cleanup (primary secondary amine). Method validation was performed in order to establish accuracy, precision, matrix effect, limit of detection, and limit of quantification. The recoveries at three concentration levels (10, 50, and 100 μg kg−1) were in the range of 70–122% with intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations which were lower than 16%. The detection and quantification limits ranged from 0.5 to 7 μg kg−1 and from 2 to 25 μg kg−1, respectively. The developed method provides good linearity, accuracy, precision, and less matrix effects for the quantitation of selected pesticides. The study confirms that this analytical method can be routinely applied for the analysis of pesticide residues in mango matrices. Finally, the validated method was successfully applied to real samples and no positive samples were found.
KeywordsPesticide residue analysis UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS Dual-nebulizer technique Matrix matched calibration Mango matrices
The authors are grateful to the Director, National Institute of Occupational Health, Ahmedabad, for granting permission to publish the article. The authors acknowledge the Indian Council of Medical Research for the financial assistance of the project (IRIS ID No. 2011-02530).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
P. Sivaperumal declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. A. Salauddin declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. A. Ramesh Kumar declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. K. Santhosh declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. T. Rupal declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any human or animal matrices.
- Botitsi HV, Garbis SD, Economou A, Tsipi DF (2011) Current mass spectrometry strategies for the analysis of pesticides and their metabolites in food and water matrices. Mass Spectrom Rev 30:907–939Google Scholar
- Diez C, Traag WA, Zommerb P, Marinero P, Atienza J (2006) Comparison of an acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” method with classical multi-residue methods for the extraction of herbicide residues in barley samples. J Chromatogr A 113:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fleury Filho N, Nascimento CA, Faria EO, Cruvinel AR, Oliveira JM (2012) Within-laboratory validation of a multi residue method for the analysis of 98 pesticides in mango by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 29:641–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grimalt S, Sancho JV, Pozo OJ, Hernandez F (2010) Quantification confirmation and screening capability of UHPLC coupled to triple quadrupole and hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in pesticide residue analysis. J Mass Spectrom 45:421–436Google Scholar
- Hernandez F, Pozo OJ, Sancho JV, Lopez FJ, Marın JM, Ibanez M (2005) Strategies for quantification and confirmation of multi-class polar pesticides and transformation products in water by LC-MS2 using triple quadrupole and hybrid quadrupole time of flight analyzers. Trends Anal Chem 24:596–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martinez Vidal JL, Fernandez Moreno JL, Arrebola Liebanas FJ, GarridoFrenich A (2007) Application of low-pressure gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry to the determination of pesticide residues in tropical fruits. J AOAC Int 90:1146–1164Google Scholar
- Martinez R, Torres P, Meneses MA, Figueroa JG, Perez-Alvarez JA, Viuda Martos M (2012) Chemical, technological and in vitro antioxidant properties of mango, guava, pineapple and passion fruit dietary fiber concentrate. Food Chem 135:1520–1526Google Scholar
- Pico Y, Blasco C, Farre M, Barcelo D (2009) Analytical utility of quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the determination of pesticide residues in comparison with an optimized column high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. J AOAC Int 92:734–744Google Scholar
- SANTE (2015) Guidance document on analytical quality control and validation procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed directorate general health and consumer protection, European Commission. SANTE/11945/2015Google Scholar
- Shelton JF, Geraghty EM, Tancredi DJ, Delwiche LD, Schmidt RJ, Ritz B, Hansen RL, Hertz-Picciotto I (2014) Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the charge study. Environ Health Perspect 122:1103–1109Google Scholar
- Sinha SN, Vasudev K, Vishnu Vardhana Rao M (2012) Quantification of organophosphate insecticides and herbicides in vegetable samples using the “Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe” (QuEChERS) method and a high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) technique. Food Chem 132:1574–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar