Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 9, Issue 11, pp 2979–2985 | Cite as

Validation of a Loop-Mediated Amplification/ISO 6579-Based Method for Analysing Soya Meal for the Presence of Salmonella enterica

  • Martin D’Agostino
  • Susana Robles
  • Flemming Hansen
  • Vasileios Ntafis
  • John Ikonomopoulos
  • Petros Kokkinos
  • Avelino Alvarez-Ordonez
  • Kieran Jordan
  • Elisabetta Delibato
  • Elżbieta Kukier
  • Zbigniew Sieradzki
  • Krzysztof Kwiatek
  • Dubravka Milanov
  • Tamaš Petrović
  • Patricia Gonzalez-Garcia
  • David Rodriguez Lazaro
  • Emily E. Jackson
  • Stephen J. Forsythe
  • Lorna O’Brien
  • Nigel Cook
Article

Abstract

An alternative method for detection of Salmonella spp. in animal feed, based on the use of loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) in conjunction with a standard culturing procedure, was compared with the standard ISO 6579 as reference method, using soya meal as the test matrix. In the method comparison study, the sensitivities for both the alternative and reference methods were 100 %. The relative level of detection was 1.000. Tested against 100 Salmonella and 30 non-Salmonella strains, the LAMP-based method was 99 % inclusive and 100 % exclusive. The interlaboratory trial involved ten laboratories from eight European countries, testing eight samples at three contamination levels: 0 cfu/100 g, 1–5 cfu/100 g and 14–68 cfu/100 g. The trial specificity, or percentage correct identification of uncontaminated samples, was 96.3 % for both the reference methods and the LAMP/ISO 6579 alternative method, thus demonstrating its suitability for adoption as a procedure for rapid identification of Salmonella uncontaminated soya meal.

Keywords

Salmonella Soya meal Lamp Validation Alternative method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Q-SAFFE project partners, particularly John Thompson and Sons Ltd., for the supply of feed samples. We thank Dr. Dario de Medici of ISS for assistance with the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission 7th Framework Project; Quality and Safety of Feeds and Food for Europe, QSAFFE (FP7-KBBE-2010-4, 265,702).

Conflict of Interest

Avelino Alvarez-Ordonez has no conflict of interest.

Nigel Cook has no conflict of interest.

Martin D’Agostino has no conflict of interest.

Elisabetta Delibato has no conflict of interest.

Stephen Forsythe has no conflict of interest.

Patricia Gonzalez-Garcia has no conflict of interest.

Flemming Hansen has no conflict of interest.

John Ikonomopoulos has no conflict of interest.

Emily E. Jackson has no conflict of interest.

Kieran Jordan has no conflict of interest.

Petros Kokkinos has no conflict of interest.

Krzysztof Kwiatek has no conflict of interest.

Elżbieta Kukier has no conflict of interests.

Dubravka Milanov has no conflict of interest.

Vasileios Ntafis has no conflict of interest.

Lorna O’Brien has no conflict of interest.

Tamas Petrovic has no conflict of interest.

Susana Robles has no conflict of interest.

David Rodriguez Lazaro has no conflict of interest.

Zbigniew Sieradzki has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent

Not applicable

References

  1. Anonymous (2002) ISO 6579:2002—microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. International Organisation for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2016) ISO 16140–1/2—microbiology of the food chain—method validation. International Organisation for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Agostino D, Diez-Valcarce M, Robles S, Losilla-Garcia B, Cook N (2015) A loop-mediated amplification-based method for analysing animal feed for the presence of Salmonella. Food Anal Methods 8:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delibato E, Rodriguez-Lazaro D, Gianfranceschi M, De Cesare A, Comin D, Gattuso A, Hernandez M, Sonnessa M, Pasquali F, Sreter-Lancz Z, Saiz-Abajo MJ, Pérez-De-Juan J, Butrón J, Prukner-Radovcic E, Horvatek Tomic D, Johannessen GS, Jakočiūnė D, Olsen JE, Chemaly M, Le Gall F, González-García P, Lettini AA, Lukac M, Quesne S, Zampieron C, De Santis P, Lovari S, Bertasi B, Pavoni E, Proroga YT, Capuano F, Manfreda G, De Medici D (2014) European validation of real-time PCR method for detection of Salmonella spp. in pork meat. Int J Food Microbiol 184:134–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Bella S, Capone A, Bordi E, Johnson E, Musso M, Topino S, Noto P, Petrosillo N (2011) Salmonella enterica ssp. arizonae infection in a 43-year-old Italian man with hypoglobulinemia: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 5:323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall ML, Rowe B (1992) Salmonella arizonae in the United Kingdom from 1966 to 1990. Epidemiol Infect 108:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hara-Kudo Y, Yoshino M, Kojima T, Ikedo M (2005) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of Salmonella. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones M, Marengo S (2016) Laboratory validation, verification, and accreditation of molecular methods. In: Cook N, D’Agostino M, KC T (eds) Molecular microbial diagnostic methods. Academic Press, London, pp. 107–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maurischat S, Baumann B, Martin A, Mealorny B (2014) Rapid detection and specific differentiation of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Enteritidis, Typhimurium and its monophasic variant 4,[5],12:i:—by real-time multiplex PCR. Int J Food Microbiol 79:175–181Google Scholar
  10. McCabe EM, Burgess CM, Walsh D, O'Regan E, McGuinness S, Barry T, Fanning S, Duffy G (2011) Validation of DNA and RNA real-time assays for food analysis using the hilA gene of Salmonella enterica serovars. J Microbiol Methods 84:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28:E63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rodriguez-Lazaro D, Hernandez M (2016) Future directions for molecular microbial diagnostic methods in the food industry. In: Cook N, D’Agostino, M, Thompson KC Molecular microbial diagnostic methods, Academic Press, London. pp. 19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin D’Agostino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susana Robles
    • 1
  • Flemming Hansen
    • 3
  • Vasileios Ntafis
    • 4
  • John Ikonomopoulos
    • 4
  • Petros Kokkinos
    • 5
  • Avelino Alvarez-Ordonez
    • 6
  • Kieran Jordan
    • 6
  • Elisabetta Delibato
    • 7
  • Elżbieta Kukier
    • 8
  • Zbigniew Sieradzki
    • 8
  • Krzysztof Kwiatek
    • 8
  • Dubravka Milanov
    • 9
  • Tamaš Petrović
    • 9
  • Patricia Gonzalez-Garcia
    • 10
  • David Rodriguez Lazaro
    • 10
    • 11
  • Emily E. Jackson
    • 12
  • Stephen J. Forsythe
    • 12
  • Lorna O’Brien
    • 13
  • Nigel Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA)North YorkshireUK
  2. 2.Campden BRIGloucestershireUK
  3. 3.Danish Meat Research InstituteTaastrupDenmark
  4. 4.Agricultural University of AthensAthensGreece
  5. 5.University of PatrasPatrasGreece
  6. 6.Teagasc Food Research CentreDublinIreland
  7. 7.Istituto Superiore di SanitaRomeItaly
  8. 8.National Veterinary Research InstitutePulawyPoland
  9. 9.Scientific Veterinary Institute “Novi Sad”Novi SadSerbia
  10. 10.Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León (ITACyL)ValladolidSpain
  11. 11.University of BurgosBurgosSpain
  12. 12.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK
  13. 13.Queen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations