Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp 2288–2298 | Cite as

An Improved Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction Method by Optimizing the Ultrasonic Frequency for Enhancing the Extraction Efficiency of Lycopene from Tomatoes

  • Jianqing LiaoEmail author
  • Nan Zheng
  • Baida Qu
Article

Abstract

In order to assess the optimization of the ultrasonic frequency in a range of 18–146 kHz for extracting lycopene from tomatoes and evaluate its influence on the extraction efficiency, an improved ultrasonic-assisted extraction (IUAE) method was proposed by using a novel ultrasonic extraction and detection system, in which the ultrasonic frequency information could be converted to intuitive waveforms that are easily identified by eyes. Additionally, to improve the extraction yield of lycopene, in this work, the optimization of various process parameters by ultrasonic treatment, including extraction time, solvent/material ratio, extraction temperature, and ultrasonic power for improving the yield of lycopene were investigated. These results indicated that all of the considered parameters had effected on the yield of lycopene significantly, and the optimum extraction conditions were as follows: extraction time duration 20 min; ratio of solvent to material 2:1; extraction temperature 25 °C; ultrasonic power 200 W; ultrasonic frequency 46–48 kHz. In comparison with other extraction methods, such as conventional solvent extraction (CSE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), supercritical carbon dioxide co-extraction (SC-CO2), and existing UAE, the IUAE method achieved a far more extraction yield, a reduction of extraction time, and a smaller amount of solvent at lower temperature, which showed a great promising prospect in the extraction and separation of natural products.

Keywords

Lycopene Ultrasonic frequency Ultrasonic extraction Improved ultrasound-assisted extraction (IUAE) 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (No. 2015J01661) and the Program of Motor Design and Control System by the Innovation Team of Ningde Normal University (No. 2013 T04).

Conflict of Interest

Jian-Qing Liao declares that he has no conflict of interest. Nan Zheng declares that she has no conflict of interest. Shun-Gen Xiao declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

References

  1. Baysal T, Ersus S, Starmans DAJ (2000) Supercritical CO2 extraction of β-carotene and lycopene from tomato paste waste. J Agric Food Chem 48:5507–5511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bramley PM (2000) Is lycopene beneficial to human health. Phytochemistry 54:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang CH, Liu YC (2007) Study on lycopene, antioxidant contents variations in tomatoes under air-drying process. J Food Sci 72:E532–E540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciurlia L, Bleve M, Rescio L (2009) Supercritical carbon dioxide co-extraction of tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) and hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.): a new procedure in obtaining a source of natural lycopene. J Supercrit Fluids 49:338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornthwaite HM, Watterson JH (2014) Microwave assisted extraction of ketamine and its metabolites from skeletal tissues. Anal Methods 6:1142–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daşbaşı T, Saçmacı Ş, Şahan S, Ülgen A, Kartal Ş (2013) An on-line separation and preconcentration system coupled with flame atomic absorption spectrometry for the determination of lead. Anal Methods 5:3307–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eh ALS, Teoh SG (2012) Novel modified ultrasonication technique for the extraction of lycopene from tomatoes. Ultrason Sonochem 19:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erdman JW, Ford NA, Lindshield BL (2009) Are the health attributes of lycopene related to its antioxidant function. Arch Biochem Biophys 483:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang Z, Dong L (1992) Flow injection on-line coprecipitation preconcentration for electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 7:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fish WW, Perkins-Veazie P, Collins JK (2002) A quantitative assay for lycopene that utilizes reduced volumes of organic solvents. J Food Compos Anal 15:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gärtner C, Stahl W, Sies H (1997) Lycopene is more bioavailable from tomato paste than from fresh tomatoes. Am J Clin Nutr 66:116–122Google Scholar
  12. Giovannucci E (1999) Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gómez-Prieto MS, Caja MM, Herraiz M, Santa-María G (2003) Supercritical fluid extraction of all-trans-lycopene from tomato. J Agric Food Chem 51:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang J, Feng R, Zhu C, Chen Z (1995) Low-MHz frequency effect on a sonochemical reaction determined by an electrical method. Ultrason Sonochem 2:93–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hung HM, Hoffmann MR (1999) Kinetics and mechanism of the sonolytic degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons: frequency effects. J Phys Chem A 103:2734–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jun X (2006) Application of high hydrostatic pressure processing of food to extracting lycopene from tomato paste waste. High Press Res 26:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Konwarh R, Pramanik S, Kalita D, Mahanta CL, Karak N (2012) Ultrasonication-A complementary ‘green chemistry’ tool to biocatalysis: a laboratory-scale study of lycopene extraction. Ultrason Sonochem 19:292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumcuoglu S, Yilmaz T, Tavman S (2014) Ultrasound assisted extraction of lycopene from tomato processing wastes. J Food Sci Technol 51:4102–4107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee MT, Chen BH (2002) Stability of lycopene during heating and illumination in a model system. Food Chem 78:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee W, Jung H, Son M, Lee H, Kwak TJ, Lee G, Yoon DS (2014) Characterization of the regrowth behavior of amyloid-like fragmented fibrils decomposed by ultrasonic treatment. RSC Adv 4:56561–56566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li DJ, Song JF, Xu AQ, Liu CQ (2014) Optimization of the ultrasound-assisted synthesis of lutein disuccinate using uniform design. Ultrason Sonochem 21:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lianfu Z, Zelong L (2008) Optimization and comparison of ultrasound/microwave assisted extraction (UMAE) and ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) of lycopene from tomatoes. Ultrason Sonochem 15:731–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin CH, Chen BH (2005) Stability of carotenoids in tomato juice during storage. Food Chem 90:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallakpour S, Dinari M, Behranvand V (2013) Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis and characterization of layered double hydroxides intercalated with bioactive N, N′-(pyromellitoyl)-bis-l-α-amino acids. RSC Adv 3:23303–23308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mason TJ, Chemat F, Vinatoru M (2011) The extraction of natural products using ultrasound or microwaves. Curr Org Chem 15:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason TJ, Paniwnyk L, Lorimer JP (1996) The uses of ultrasound in food technology. Ultrason Sonochem 3:S253–S260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Minhthy L, Steven JS (1999) Lycopene: chemical and biological properties. Food Technol 53:38–45Google Scholar
  28. Mizrach A (2008) Ultrasonic technology for quality evaluation of fresh fruit and vegetables in pre and postharvest processes. Postharvest Biol Technol 48:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ofori B, Lee K (2014) Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of α-tocopherol antioxidants from the fronds of Elaeis guineensis Jacq.: optimization, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies. Food Anal Methods 7:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pingret D, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Le Bourvellec C, Renard CM, Chemat F (2012) Lab and pilot-scale ultrasound-assisted water extraction of polyphenols from apple pomace. J Food Eng 111:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Povey MJW (1998) Ultrasonics of food. Contemp Phys 39:467–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao AV, Agarwal S (1999) Role of lycopene as antioxidant carotenoid in the prevention of chronic diseases: a review. Nutr Res 19:305–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rozzi NL, Singh RK, Vierling RA, Watkins BA (2002) Supercritical fluid extraction of lycopene from tomato processing byproducts. J Agric Food Chem 50:2638–2643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shi J, Wu Y, Bryan M et al (2002) Oxidation and isomerization of lycopene under thermal treatment and light irradiation in food processing. J Food Sci Nutr 7:179–183Google Scholar
  35. Sun Y, Liu D, Chen J, Ye X, Yu D (2011) Effects of different factors of ultrasound treatment on the extraction yield of the all-trans-β-carotene from citrus peels. Ultrason Sonochem 18:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teng H, Lee W, Choi Y (2014) Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of polyphenols, anthocyanins, and antioxidants from raspberry (Rubus coreanus Miq.) using response surface methodology. Food Anal Methods 7:1536–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toma RB, Frank GC, Nakayama K, Tawfik E (2008) Lycopene content in raw tomato varieties and tomato products. J Foodserv 19:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vichare NP, Senthilkumar P, Moholkar VS, Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2000) Energy analysis in acoustic cavitation. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:1480–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wen L, Yang B, Cui C, You L, Zhao M (2012) Ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolics from longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) fruit seed with artificial neural network and their antioxidant activity. Food Anal Methods 5:1244–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willcox JK, Catignani GL, Lazarus S (2003) Tomatoes and cardiovascular health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu Y, Pan S (2013) Effects of various factors of ultrasonic treatment on the extraction yield of all-trans-lycopene from red grapefruit (Citrus paradise Macf.). Ultrason Sonochem 20:1026–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhao S, Wang X, Zhang L (2013) Rapid and efficient Knoevenagel condensation catalyzed by a novel protic ionic liquid under ultrasonic irradiation. RSC Adv 3:11691–11696CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Industrial Advanced Process Control for Light Industry of Ministry of EducationJiangnan UniversityWuxiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Electrical EngineeringNingde Normal UniversityNingdePeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Chemical and Environment ScienceShaanxi University of technologyHanzhongPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations