Advertisement

Food Analytical Methods

, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp 2161–2173 | Cite as

Classification of Honey According to Geographical and Botanical Origins and Detection of Its Adulteration Using Voltammetric Electronic Tongue

  • Madiha Bougrini
  • Khalid Tahri
  • Tarik Saidi
  • Nadia El Alami El Hassani
  • Benachir Bouchikhi
  • Nezha El BariEmail author
Article

Abstract

Main possible honey fraud is the addition of various sugar syrups. But, there are also other types of fraud, such as deception on the geographical and/or botanical origin product. Providing a product of the hive with full authenticity is therefore crucial for the preservation of beekeeping. In this pursuit, voltammetric electronic tongue (VE-tongue) was employed to classify honey samples from different geographical and botanical origins. Furthermore, VE-tongue was used to detect adulterants such as glucose syrup (GS) and saccharose syrup (SS) in honey. The data obtained were analyzed by three-pattern recognition techniques: principal component analysis (PCA), support vector machines (SVMs), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). These methods enabled the classification of 18 honeys of different geographical origins and 7 honeys of different botanical origins. Excellent results were obtained also in the detection of adulterated honey. Therefore, this simple method based on VE-tongue could be useful in the honey packaging and commercialization industry.

Keywords

Voltammetric electronic tongue Pattern recognition techniques Discrimination of honey Geographical/botanical origins Adulteration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the APIA cooperative for the honeys it provides us.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interests in connection with the work submitted.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript for publication.

References

  1. Dias LA, Peres AM, Vilas-Boas M, Rocha MA, Estevinho L, Machado AASC (2008) An electronic tongue for honey classification. Microchim Acta 163:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adnan S, Mine B, Ahmet CG (2012) 13C/12C pattern of honey from Turkey and determination of adulteration in commercially available honey samples using EA-IRMS. Food Chem 130:1115–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammar Z, Ali Yeon S, Maz MI, Mohd NA, Adom A, Mahmad Nor J, Supri G, Abu Hassan A, Abdul Hallis A, Latifah Munirah K, Norazian S, Nazifah A (2011) A biomimetic sensor for the classification of honeys of different floral origin and the detection of adulteration. Sensors 11:7799–7822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anitta P, Anamaria H, Claudia C (2013) Application of a newly developed and validated high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method to control honey adulteration. J Chromatogr A 272:132–135Google Scholar
  5. Bougrini M, Tahri K, Haddi Z, El Bari N, Llobet E, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Bouchikhi B (2014a) Aging time and brand determination of pasteurized milk using a multisensor e-nose combined with a voltammetric e-tongue. Mater Sci Eng C 45:348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bougrini M, Tahri K, Haddi Z, Saidi T, El Bari N, Bouchikhi B (2014) Detection of Adulteration in Argan Oil by Using an Electronic Nose and a Voltammetric Electronic Tongue. Journal of SensorsGoogle Scholar
  7. Bueno L, De Araujo WR, Salles MO, Kussuda MY, Paixão TRLC (2014) Voltammetric electronic tongue for discrimination of milk adulterated with urea, formaldehyde and melamine. Chemosensors 2:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 2(3)Google Scholar
  9. Chen LZ, Xue XF, Ye ZH, Zhou JH, Chen F, Zhao J (2011) Determination of Chinese honey adulterated with high fructose corn syrup by near infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem 128(4):1110–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davide B, Massimo L (2010) Detection of honey adulteration by sugar syrups using one-dimensional and two-dimensional high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance. J Agric Food Chem 58:8495–8501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Du B, Wu L, Xue X, Chen L, Li Y, Zhao J, Cao W (2015) Rapid Screening of Multiclass Syrup Adulterants in Honey by Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Quadrupole Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, accepted ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  12. Elflein L, Raezke KP (2008) Improved detection of honey adulteration by measuring differences between13C/12C stable carbon isotope ratios of protein and sugar compounds with a combination of elemental analyzer - isotope ratio mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography - isotope ratio mass spectrometry (δ13C-EA/LC-IRMS)*. Apidologie 39:574–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Escriche I, Kadar M, Domenech E, Gil-Sánchez L (2012) A potentiometric electronic tongue for the discrimination of honey according to the botanical origin. Comparison with traditional methodologies: Physicochemical parameters and volatile profile. J Food Eng 109:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M, Mohtasebi SS, Siadat M (2010) Biomimetic-based odour and taste sensing systems to food quality and safety characterization: an overview on basic principles and recent achievements. J Food Eng 100:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gutiérrez JM, Haddi Z, Amari A, Bouchikhi B, Mimendia A, Cetó X, del Valle M (2013) Hybrid electronic tongue based on multisensor data fusion for discrimination of beers. Sensors Actuators B 177:989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haddi Z, Alami H, El Bari N, Tounsi M, Barhoumi H, Maaref A, Jaffrezic Renault N, Bouchikhi B (2013) Electronic nose and tongue combination for improved classification of Moroccan virgin olive oil profiles. Food Res Int 54:1488–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddi Z, El Barbri N, Tahri K, Bougrini M, El Bari N, Llobet E, Bouchikhi B (2015) Instrumental assessment of red meat origins and their storage time using electronic sensing systems. Analytical Methods, Accepted ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  18. Hermosin I, Chicon RM, Cabezudo MD (2003) Free amino acid composition and botanical origin of honey. Food Chem 83:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ioannidou MD, Zachariadis GA, Anthemidis AN, Stratis JA (2005) Direct determination of toxic trace metals in honey and sugars using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Talanta 65:92–97Google Scholar
  20. Janczyk M, Kutyła A, Sollohub K, Wosicka H, Cal K, Ciosek P (2010) Electronic tongue for the detection of taste-masking microencapsulation of active pharmaceutical substances. Bioelectrochemistry 80:94–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lolli M, Bertelli D, PLESSI M, Sabatini AG, Restani C (2008) Classification of Italian Honeys by 2D HR-NMR. J Agri Food Chem 56:1298–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nozal Nalda MJ, Bernal Yague JL, Diego Calva JC, Martin Gomez MT (2005) Classifying honeys from the Soria Province of Spain via multivariate analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 382:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruíz–Matute AI, Rodríguez-Sanchez S, Sanchez ML, Martínez-Castro I (2010) Detection of adulterations of honey with high fructose syrups from inulin by GC analysis. J Food Compos Anal 23:273–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tananaki C, Thrasyvoulou A, Giraudel JL, Montury M (2007) Determination of volatile characteristics of Greek and Turkish pine honey samples and their classification by using Kohonen self organising maps. Food Chem 101:1687–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiwari K, Tudu B, Bandyopadhyay R, Chatterjee A (2013) Identification of monofloral honey using voltammetric electronic tongue. J Food Eng 117:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tosun N, Cogun C, Tosun G (2004) A study on kerf and material removal rate in wire electrical discharge machining based on Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 152:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vapnik V (1998) Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang J, Xue X, Du X, Cheng N, Chen L, Zhao J, Zheng J, Cao W (2014) Identification of acacia honey adulteration with rape honey using liquid chromatography–electrochemical detection and chemometrics. Food Anal Methods 7:2003–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei Z, Wang J (2011) Classification of monofloral honeys by voltammetric electronic tongue with chemometrics method. Electrochim Acta 56:4907–4915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wei Z, Wang J, Liao W (2009) Technique potential for classification of honey by electronic tongue. J Food Eng 94:260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winquisk F (2008) Voltammetric electronic tongues—basic principles and applications. Microchim Acta 163:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Woodcock T, Downey G, Kelly JD, O’Donnell A (2007) Geographical classification of honey samples by near-infrared spectroscopy: a feasibility study. J Agri Food Chem 55:9128–9134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xue X, Wang Q, Li Y, Wu L, Chen L, Zhao J, Liu F (2013) 2-Acetylfuran-3-glucopyranoside as a novel marker for the detection of honey adulterated with rice syrup. J Agric Food Chem 61:7488–7493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao J, Du X, Cheng N, Chen L, Xue X, Zhao J, Wu L, Cao W (2016) Identification of monofloral honeys using HPLC–ECD and chemometrics. Food Chem 194:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhou W, Li C, Sun C, Yang X (2015) Simultaneously determination of trace Cd2+ and Pb2+ based on L-cysteine/graphene modified glassy carbon electrode. Food Chemistry, Accepted ManuscriptGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madiha Bougrini
    • 1
    • 2
  • Khalid Tahri
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tarik Saidi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nadia El Alami El Hassani
    • 2
    • 1
  • Benachir Bouchikhi
    • 1
  • Nezha El Bari
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Sensor Electronic & Instrumentation Group, Faculty of Sciences, Physics DepartmentMoulay Ismaïl UniversityMeknesMorocco
  2. 2.Biotechnology Agroalimentary and Biomedical Analysis Group, Faculty of Sciences, Biology DepartmentMoulay Ismaïl UniversityMeknesMorocco

Personalised recommendations