Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a Reference Measurement Procedure and Certified Reference Material for the Determination of Hydroxyproline in Meat

Food Analytical Methods volume 9, pages 1461–1469 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

The concentration of trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline has been traditionally employed as an estimate of collagen content in meat to assess meat quality. Conventional methods use chemical derivatization followed by UV–visible detection. However, complexity of the matrix may cause interferences due to lack of specificity and consequently bias quantification. On the contrary, liquid chromatography (LC) separation coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) detection overcomes these limitations, giving more accurate results. This study describes the development and validation of an exact matching-isotopic dilution mass spectrometry method for the determination of hydroxyproline in meat hydrolysates in the certification of a candidate meat reference material (CRM LGC7154). The method is not biased by changes in method conditions or by matrix load. Hydroxyproline concentrations and relative uncertainties for quality control samples revealed good agreement with the certified values. A mean hydroxyproline concentration of 1.78 ± 0.28 g/kg (k = 2) was found for the CRM LGC 7154 material.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • AOAC (2000). OFFICIAL METHOD 990.26, 985.14, 992.23, 991.36 and 923.03, Official Methods of Analysis (17th ed.). Gaithersburg, (n.d.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists

  • Armstrong M, Jonscher K, Reisdorph NA (2007) Analysis of 25 underivatized amino acids in human plasma using ion-pairing reversed-phase liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 21:2717–2726. doi:10.1002/rcm.3124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker LC, Lampitl LM, Brown KP (1953) Connective tissue of meat. II.—determination of hydroxyproline. J Sci Food Agric 4:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bièvre PD, Kaarls R, Peiser HS et al (1996) Measurement principles for traceability in chemical analysis. Accred Qual Assur 1:3–13. doi:10.1007/s007690050026

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann A, Möller C, Steinhart H et al (1995) Pyridinoline cross-links in bovine muscle collagen. J Food Sci 60:953–958. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb06269.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (1997) BS 4401-10:1997, ISO 13730:1996 Methods of test for meat and meat products. Determination of total phosphorus content. Spectrometric method

  • Burns DT, Danzer K, Townshend A (2009) A tutorial discussion of the use of the terms “Robust” and “Rugged” and the associated characteristics of “Robustness” and “Ruggedness” as used in descriptions of analytical procedures. J Assoc Public Anal 37:40–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgrave ML, Allingham PG, Jones A (2008) Hydroxyproline quantification for the estimation of collagen in tissue using multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1212:150–153. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delport M, Maas S, van der Merwe SW, Laurens JB (2004) Quantitation of hydroxyproline in bone by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 804:345–351. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.01.039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison SLR, Williams A (Eds) (2012) Eurachem/CITAC guide: quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, Third ed, ISBN 978-0-948926-30-3. Available from www.eurachem.org

  • European Commission (1998) General guidelines for implementing the principle of quantitative ingredients declaration (QUID)–Article 7 of Directive 79/112/EEC as amended by Directive 97/4/E), http://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/docs/labelling_legislation_guidance_quid_en.pdf

  • Gresley AL, Fardus F, Warren J (2015) Bias and uncertainty in non-ideal qNMR analysis. Crit Rev Anal Chem 45(4):300–310. doi:10.1080/10408347.2014.944971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrion A (1994) Reduction of systematic errors in quantitative analysis by isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS): an iterative method. Fresenius J Anal Chem 350:657–658. doi:10.1007/BF00323658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopley CJ, Stokes P, Webb KS, Baynham M (2004) The analysis of thyroxine in human serum by an “exact matching” isotope dilution method with liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18:1033–1038. doi:10.1002/rcm.1441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langrock T, Czihal P, Hoffmann R (2006) Amino acid analysis by hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled on-line to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Amino Acids 30:291–297. doi:10.1007/s00726-005-0300-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y-K, Kuan C-Y (2010) Development of 4-hydroxyproline analysis kit and its application to collagen quantification. Food Chem 119:1271–1277. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.08.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Messia MC, Di Falco T, Panfili G, Marconi E (2008) Rapid determination of collagen in meat-based foods by microwave hydrolysis of proteins and HPAEC–PAD analysis of 4-hydroxyproline. Meat Sci 80:401–409. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.01.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piraud M, Vianey-Saban C, Petritis K et al (2005) Ion-pairing reversed-phase liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis of 76 underivatized amino acids of biological interest: a new tool for the diagnosis of inherited disorders of amino acid metabolism. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:1587–1602. doi:10.1002/rcm.1957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Premanandh J (2013) Horse meat scandal—a wake-up call for regulatory authorities. Food Control 34:568–569. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.05.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent M, Harte R, Harrington C (2002) Guidelines for achieving high accuracy in isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). Royal Society of Chemistry

  • Sentandreu MÁ, Sentandreu E (2014) Authenticity of meat products: tools against fraud. Food Res Int 60:19–29. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E (2004) Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 23:535–552. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2004.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trufelli H, Palma P, Famiglini G, Cappiello A (2011) An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 30:491–509. doi:10.1002/mas.20298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Heyden Y, Luypaert K, Hartmann C et al (1995) Ruggedness tests on the high-performance liquid chromatography assay of the United States Pharmacopeia XXII for tetracycline hydrochloride. A comparison of experimental designs and statistical interpretations. Anal Chim Acta 312:245–262. doi:10.1016/0003-2670(95)00221-K

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zukál E, Körmendy L (2007) On calculation of “meat content” according to the quantitative ingredient declarations (QUID). J Food Eng 78:614–621. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described here was funded by the Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). The authors would like to thank Hayley Forbes for her help in the sample preparation and Philip Wilson for the support in the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LGC Limited, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK

    Camilla Liscio & Christopher Hopley

Authors
  1. Camilla Liscio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Hopley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilla Liscio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author Camilla Liscio declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Christopher Hopley declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

• Colorimetric method is fit for the purpose but can be biased by matrix complexity

• LC-MS approach can overcome limitations giving accurate results

• An EM-IDMS-LC-MS method for hydroxyproline in meat hydrolysates was developed

• Validated method was robust and unbiased by condition changes in or matrix load

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liscio, C., Hopley, C. Development of a Reference Measurement Procedure and Certified Reference Material for the Determination of Hydroxyproline in Meat. Food Anal. Methods 9, 1461–1469 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0329-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0329-x

Keywords

search

Navigation