Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Methodologies for the Extraction of Bacterial DNA from Mussels—Relevance for Food Safety

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The control of the microbiological quality of bivalve molluscs assumes particular importance because they are among the most produced seafood products and mostly consumed as a whole, raw, or lightly cooked. The composition of the bacterial community associated with bivalves depends mostly on the microbiology of the surrounding environment at growing sites. Once the relationship between microbiology of bivalves and environment is established, a better classification and monitoring of the shellfish beds and evaluation of depuration strategies can be achieved. In this work, we tested if the methods of DNA extraction commonly used for the culture-independent microbiological analysis of sediment and water could be used directly, or with modifications, for the analysis of bacteria in mussels. The commercial kits Genomic DNA Purification Kit (MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania), UltraCleanTM Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MOBIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and the method described by Griffiths and collaborators for DNA/RNA co-extraction were compared. The efficiency of extraction was assessed by DNA fluorescence and the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis gel patterns of 16S ribosomal RNA gene fragments were used to compare the reproducibility and representativeness of the extraction methods. Results showed that the DNA/RNA co-extraction method with modifications was the most suitable. However, the results must be interpreted in the light of the purpose of the study and the relevance of maximizing extraction yield or diversity estimate, without compromising reproducibility. To our knowledge, this was the first attempt to transpose the procedure currently used for DNA extraction from sediments or waters, to the analysis of whole mussels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2004a) Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) Nº 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (in Official Journal of the European Union L 139 of 30 April 2004). Official Journal of the European Union

  • Anonymous (2004b) Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) Nº 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organization of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (in Official Journal of the European Union L 139 of 30 April 2004). Official Journal of the European Union

  • Anonymous (2005) Commission Regulation (EC) Nº 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union

  • Anonymous (2007) Commission Regulation (EC) Nº 1441/2007 of 5 December 2007 amending Regulation (EC) Nº 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union

  • Anonymous (2008). Commission Regulation (EC) Nº 1021/2008 of 17 October 2008 amending Annexes I, II and III to Regulation (EC) Nº 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific rules for the organization of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption and Regulation (EC) Nº 2076/2005 as regards live bivalve molluscs, certain fishery products and staff assisting with official controls in slaughterhouses. Official Journal of the European Union

  • Anonymous (2010) Diário da República, 2ª série-Nº 182–17 de Setembro de 2010, Despacho nº 14515/2010.

  • Campos CJA, Cachola RA (2006) Internet J Food Safety 8:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (1999) Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: User manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK, p 91. Accessed 21 April 2012

  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v5: User manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK, p 192. Accessed 21 April 2012

  • Croci L, Serratore P, Cozzi L et al (2001) Lett Appl Microbiol 32:57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen DW, Hirsch PR (1998) Soil Biol Biochem 30:983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome, 2010)

  • Gillan DC, Speksnijder AG, Zwart G, De Ridder C (1998) Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3464

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes NCM, Flocco CG, Costa R et al (2010) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RI, Whiteley AS, O’Donnell AG, Bailey MJ (2000) Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gugliandolo C, Lentini V, Spanò A, Maugeri TL (2010) Lett Appl Microbiol 52:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques IS, Almeida A, Cunha A, Correia A (2004) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49:269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Zárate G, Olmos-Soto J (2006) J Appl Microbiol 100:664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H, Kroppenstedt RM, Lottmann J, Berg G, Smalla K (2002) Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR (1998) J Bacteriol 180:4765

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huss HH, Ababouch L, Gram L, FAO Fisheries (2004) FAO Fisheries technical paper. Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States, Rome, p 444

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanne HD, Kroll RG, Grant KA (1995) Lett Appl Microbiol 20:212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai X, Zeng X, Fang S, Huang Y, Cao L, Zhou S (2006) World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lees D (2000) Int J Food Microbiol 59:81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KM, Ming TJ, Schulze AD, Withler RE (1999) Biotechniques 27:1016

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murchie LW, Cruz-Romero M, Kerry JP et al (2005) Innovat Food Sci Emerg Tech 6:257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nübel U, Engelen B, Felske A et al (1996) J Bacteriol 178:5636

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira J, Cunha A, Castilho F, Romalde JL, Pereira MJ (2011) Food Control 22:805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto AL, Teixeira P, Castilho F, Felício MT, Pombal F, Gibbs PA (2006) Aquaculture Res 37:1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power UF, Collins JK (1990) Appl Environ Microbiol 56:803

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramette A (2007) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62:142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards GP (1988) J Food Protect 51:218

    Google Scholar 

  • Romalde JL, Area E, Sánchez G et al (2002) Int J Food Microbiol 74:119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rompré A, Servais P, Baudart J, de-Roubin M-R, Laurent P (2002) J Microbiol Meth 49:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossen L, Norskov P, Holmstrom K, Rasmussen OF (1992) Int J Food Microbiol 17:37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva HA, Batista I (2008) Publicações Avulsas do IPIMAR. Produção, salubridade e comercialização de moluscos bivalves em Portugal. Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar - IPIMAR, Lisboa, p 171

  • Smalla K, Wieland G, Buchner A et al (2001) Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Marcelino LA, Polz MF (2005) In: Belkin S, Colwell RR, Thompson JR, Marcelino LA, Polz MF (eds) Oceans and health: pathogens in the marine environment. Springer, New York, p 29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M, Amann R, Lemmer H, Schleifer KH (1993) Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward DM, Weller R, Bateson MM (1990) Nat 345:63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) J Bacteriol 173:697

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2010) Safe management of shellfish and harvest waters, First edn.th edn. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology in the form of the Ph. D. Grant SFRH/BD/28747/2006. Funding was also provided by Biology Department and CESAM, University of Aveiro. The authors are grateful to Newton Gomes from the LEMAM/CESAM facility for technical support, scientific advice, and critical revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacinta M. Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oliveira, J.M., Cunha, Â.S., Almeida, A.P. et al. Comparison of Methodologies for the Extraction of Bacterial DNA from Mussels—Relevance for Food Safety. Food Anal. Methods 6, 201–209 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-012-9419-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-012-9419-1

Keywords