Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of Mineral Contents in Tomato Fruits During the Ripening Process After Harvest

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the mineral content of tomato during ripening after harvest. Calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), selenium (Se), and zinc (Zn) contents were determined in three of the main tomato types (round, elongated, and cherry) consumed in Portugal. Ca, Mg, Se, and Zn were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry, Na and K by flame photometry, and P by visible spectrometry. No significant variation was found in the Zn, P, Na, and K concentrations during the tomato ripening after harvest. For Ca, Mg and, especially, Se, significant variations in their corresponding concentrations were observed. The content of Ca and Mg tended to decrease from the initial concentration. Conversely, a considerable increase in Se content was observed. A decrease in total tomato mineral content was determined for all studied types after an 11-day period of maturation after harvest. Therefore, a new and significant aspect to emphasize as an outcome of this study is that an 11-day post-harvest ripening period for tomato ingestion by the final consumer should be recommended in order to benefit from the highest mineral content. This acquaintance could be very important for tomato agricultural practices and for economic development of this type of cultivation, as well as for the consumer’s health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis of AOAC: food composition; additives; natural contaminants (vol. II). In: Helrich K (ed) Arlington

  • Briefel RR, Bialostosky K, Kennedy-Stephenson J, McDowell MA, Ervin RB, Wright JD (2000) J Nutr 130:1367S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Codex Alimentarius (2008) Codex standard for tomatoes: Codex Stan 293-2008 www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/11013/CXS_293e.pdf, Accessed in January, 2009, 7th

  • Coudray C, Bureau S, Reich M, Amiot-Carlin M-J, Giovannuci E (1999) J Natl Cancer Inst 91:317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster LH, Sumar S (1997) Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 37:211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guil-Guerrero JL, Rebolloso-Fuentes MM (2008) J Food Compost Anal 22:123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwich N (2000) Etud Rurales 155–156:239

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández M, Rull J, Rios D, Rodríguez E, Díaz C (2005) Electr J Environ Agric Food Chem 4:1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesteloot H, Joossens JV (1988) Hypertens 12:594

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants (2ª ed). Academic Press, New York, pp 278–290

  • Martins I, Porto A, Oliveira L (2006) Tabela da Composição de Alimentos, ed. by Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon

  • Murphy E, Eisner DA (2009) Circulat Res 104:292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musse M, Quelleca S, Cambert M, Devaux M-F, Lahayec M, Mariettea F (2009) Postharvest Biol Technol 53:22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Power ML, Heaney RP, Kalkwarf HJ, Pitkin RM, Repke JT, Tsang RC, Schulkin J (1999) Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos F, Castilho MC, Silveira MIN (1992) In: Halpern MJ (ed) Molecular biology of atherosclerosis. John Libbey and Company Ltd, London, pp 539–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainju UM, Dris R, Singh B (2003) Food Agric Environ 1:176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shils ME (1988) Ann Rev Nutr 8:429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva GG, Diniz RG, Silva ME (2007) Rev Capixaba Ciênc Tecnol 3:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez MH, Rodríguez EMR, Romero CD (2007) Food Chem 104:489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyssandier V, Feillet-Coudray C, Caris-Veyrat C, Guilland J-C, Weisburger J (2002) Exp Biol Med 227:924

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyssandier V, Feillet-Coudray C, Caris-Veyrat C, Guilland J-C, Coudray C, Bureau S, Reich M, Amiot-Carlin M-J, Bouteloup-Demange C, Boirie Y, Borel P (2004) J Am Coll Nutr 23:148

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture (2009) Standards for grade of fresh tomatoes (7CFR980.212). US Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Weichmann J (1987) In: Weichamann J (ed) Postharvest physiology of vegetables. Dekker, New-York, pp 481–485

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mr. Pedro Alves for the technical support in mineral determinations by atomic absorption spectrophotometry and to Mr. José Marques, manager of VALMARQUES Enterprise, for supplying samples. The authors are also grateful to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (POCTI-SFA-8-177) for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Ramos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costa, F., de Lurdes Baeta, M., Saraiva, D. et al. Evolution of Mineral Contents in Tomato Fruits During the Ripening Process After Harvest. Food Anal. Methods 4, 410–415 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-010-9179-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-010-9179-8

Keywords

Navigation