Skip to main content
Log in

A Descriptive Systematic Review of Physical Activity Interventions for Caregivers: Effects on Caregivers’ and Care Recipients’ Psychosocial Outcomes, Physical Activity Levels, and Physical Health

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Caregiving can adversely impact individuals’ psychosocial and physical well-being. An important task in health research is to find effective ways to enhance caregivers’ health and functioning.

Purpose

To provide a systematic review of the efficacy of physical activity (PA) interventions for caregivers on their and the care recipients’ psychosocial outcomes, PA levels, and physical health.

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, a descriptive systematic review of studies examining the effects of PA interventions for caregivers on their outcomes and those of the care recipients was conducted. Studies were primarily identified through searching electronic databases.

Results

Fourteen studies were reviewed. PA interventions significantly decreased caregivers’ distress and increased their well-being, quality of life, sleep quality, PA levels, self-efficacy for caregiving or exercise, and readiness for exercise. Most PA interventions targeted the caregiver alone. Two studies examined the impact of the intervention on the care recipient and found no significant effect.

Conclusions

PA interventions hold promise in improving caregivers’ outcomes. However, more high quality trials are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sinha M. Spotlight on Canadians: Results from the General Social Survey. Portrait of caregivers. Statistics Canada catalogue. 2012 (89-652).

  2. Lambert SD, Girgis A, Levesque J: The impact of cancer and chronic conditions on caregivers and family members. In B. Koczwara (ed), Cancer and Chronic Conditions: Addressing the Problem of Multimorbidity in Cancer Patients and Survivors, In press.

  3. National Alliance for Caregiving (NAC), American Association of Retired Persons (AARP): Caregiving in the U.S. Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute, 2015.

  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings, 2012. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Ryn M, Sanders S, Kahn K, et al. Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: A hidden quality issue? Psychooncology. 2010; 20: 45-52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fast J, Niehaus L, Eales J, Keating N. A profile of Canadian chronic care providers. In University of Albert report submitted to Human Resources and Development Canada. Edmonton: Department of Human Ecology, 2002.

  7. Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood P. The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012; 28: 205-212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3: 223-228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcus J, Hollander GL, Neena LC. Who cares and how much? The imputed economic contribution to the Canadian healthcare system of middle-aged and older unpaid caregivers providing care to the elderly. Healthc Q. 2009; 12: 42-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheets DJ, Blacl K, Kaye LW. Who cares for the caregiver? Evidence-based approaches to family support. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2014; 57: 525-530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Northouse N, McCorkle R, et al. Spouse caregivers of cancer patients. In: Holland JC, Breitbart WS, Jacobsen PB, eds. Psycho-Oncology. New York, New York: Oxford University Press; 2010: 516-521.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lambert S, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C, Stacey F. Walking a mile in their shoes: Anxiety and depression among caregivers of cancer survivors at six and 12 months post-diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2013; 21: 75-85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lambert SD, Jones B, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C. Distressed partners and caregivers do not recover easily: Adjustment trajectories among partners and caregivers of cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44: 225-235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Girgis A, Lambert SD. Caregivers of cancer survivors: The state of the field. Cancer Forum. 2009; 33: 167-171.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Girgis A, Lambert SD, Johnson C, Waller A, Currow D. Physical, psychosocial, relationship and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: A review. J Oncol Pract. 2013; 9: 197-202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cranswick K. General Social Survey cycle 16: Caring for an aging society. Ottawa, ON: I Statistics Canada catalogue; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu T, Loscalzo M, Ramani R, et al. Factors associated with high burden in caregivers of older adults with cancer. Cancer. 2014; 120: 2927-2935.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Supporting informal caregivers—The heart of home care. Ottawa, ON. 2010.

  19. Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003; 18: 250-267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim Y, Schulz R. Family caregivers’ strain: Comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. J Aging Health. 2008; 20: 483-503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW. Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60: 317-339.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Regan T, Lambert SD, Girgis A, et al. Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer? BMC Cancer. 2012; 12: 279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sörensen S, Pinquart M, Duberstein P. How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis. The Gerontologist. 2002; 42: 356-372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gallagher-Thompson D, Coon DW. Evidence-based psychological treatments for distress in family caregivers of older adults. Psychol Aging. 2007; 22: 37-51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimazu K, Shimodera S, Mino Y, et al. Family psychoeducation for major depression: Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 198: 385-390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scott JL, Halford KW, Ward BG. United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72: 1122-1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nezu A, Nezu C, Felgoise S, McClure K, Houts P. Project Genesis: Assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Martire LM, Lustig AP, Schulz R, Miller GE, Helgeson VS. Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 599-611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reiner M, Niermann C, Jekauc D, Woll A. Long-term health benefits of physical activity—A systematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ. 2006; 174: 801-809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Fitzpatrick TR, Edgar L, Holcroft C. Assessing the relationship between physical fitness activities, cognitive health and quality of life among older breast cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012; 30: 556-572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nilsen TI, Vatten LJ. Prospective study of colorectal cancer risk and physical activity, diabetes, blood glucose and BMI: Exploring the hyperinsulinaemia hypothesis. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84: 417-422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirano A, Suzuki Y, Kuzuya M, et al. Influence of regular exercise on subjective sense of burden and physical symptoms in community-dwelling caregivers of dementia patients: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011; 53: e158-163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Danucalov MA, Kozasa EH, Ribas KT, et al. A yoga and compassion meditation program reduces stress in familial caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 3: 513149.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Connell CM, Janevic MR. Effects of a telephone-based exercise intervention for dementia caregiving wives: A randomized controlled trial. J Appl Gerontol. 2009; 28: 171-194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Swartz JJ, Keir ST. Program preferences to reduce stress in caregivers of patients with brain tumors. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007; 11: 723-727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Martin AC, Keats MR. The impact of yoga on quality of life and psychological distress in caregivers for patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014; 41: 257-264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chassin L, Macy JT, Seo DC, Presson CC, Sherman SJ. The association between membership in the sandwich generation and health behaviors: A longitudinal study. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2010; 31: 38-46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Orgeta V, Miranda-Castillo C. Does physical activity reduce burden in carers of people with dementia? A literature review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014; 29: 771-783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loi SM, Dow B, Ames D, et al. Physical activity in caregivers: What are the psychological benefits? Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014; 59: 204-210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lambert SD, Girgis A, Descallar J, Levesque JV, Jones B. Partners’ and caregivers’ psychological and physical adjustment to cancer within the first five years post survivor diagnosis. Psychooncology. 2014; 23: 78.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kershaw T, Mood D, Newth G, et al. Longitudinal analysis of a model to predict quality of life in prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 36: 117-128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group TP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 264-269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thompson PD, Buchner D, Piña IL, et al. Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2003; 107: 3109-3116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0: Wiley Online Library; 2008. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessibility verified September 9th, 2015.

  46. Chambless DL, Hollon SD. Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consul Clin Psychol. 1998; 66: 7-18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Blundell M. Understanding and synthesizing my numerical data. In: Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R, eds. Doing a systematic review—A student’s guide. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Turner RM, Bird SM, Higgins JP. The impact of study size on meta-analyses: Examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8, e59202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Field AP. Dread returns to Mega-Silly One. Health Psychol Rev. 2015; 9: 15-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cohen JH. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Varambally S, Vidyendaran S, Sajjanar M, et al. Yoga-based intervention for caregivers of outpatients with psychosis: A randomized controlled pilot study. Asian J Psychiatr. 2013; 6: 141-145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Van Puymbroeck M, Payne LL, Hsieh PC. A phase I feasibility study of yoga on the physical health and coping of informal caregivers. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2007; 4: 519-529.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. King AC, Brassington G. Enhancing physical and psychological functioning in older family caregivers: The role of regular physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 1997; 19: 91-100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. King AC, Baumann K, O’Sullivan P, Wilcox S, Castro C. Effects of moderate-intensity exercise on physiological, behavioral, and emotional responses to family caregiving: A randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57: M26-36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Castro CM, Wilcox S, O’Sullivan P, Baumann K, King AC. An exercise program for women who are caring for relatives with dementia. Psychosom Med. 2002; 64: 458-468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Farran CJ, Staffileno BA, Gilley DW, et al. A lifestyle physical activity intervention for caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2008; 23: 132-142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Canonici AP, Andrade LP, Gobbi S, et al. Functional dependence and caregiver burden in Alzheimer’s disease: A controlled trial on the benefits of motor intervention. Psychogeriatrics. 2012; 12: 186-192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Marsden D, Quinn R, Pond N, et al. A multidisciplinary group programme in rural settings for community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors and their carers: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24: 328-341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Waelde LC, Thompson L, Gallagher-Thompson D. A pilot study of a yoga and meditation intervention for dementia caregiver stress. J Clin Psychol. 2004; 60: 677-687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hill K, Smith R, Fearn M, Rydberg M, Oliphant R. Physical and psychological outcomes of a supported physical activity program for older carers. J Aging Phys Act. 2007; 15: 257-271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: A systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011; 72: 1214-1221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ntala C, Birmpili P, Worth A, Anderson NH, Sheikh A. The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: A systematic review. Prim Care Respir J. 2013; 22: 417-424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Andrew E, Anis A, Chalmers T, et al. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. JAMA. 1994; 272: 1926-1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012; 10: 28-55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kinser PA, Robins JL. Control group design: Enhancing rigor in research of mind-body therapies for depression. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013: 140467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Lambert SD, McElduff P, Girgis A, et al. A pilot, multisite, randomized controlled trial of a self-directed coping skills training intervention for couples facing prostate cancer: Accrual, retention, and data collection issues. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24: 711-722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sallis JF. Measuring physical activity: Practical approaches for program evaluation in Native American communities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010; 16: 404-410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Jefferis BJ, Sartini C, Lee IM, et al. Adherence to physical activity guidelines in older adults, using objectively measured physical activity in a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 44: 119-127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. King A, Friedman R, Marcus B, et al. Harnessing motivational forces in the promotion of physical activity: The Community Health Advice by Telephone (CHAT) project. Health Educ Res. 2002; 17: 627-636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Uebelacker LA, Epstein-Lubow G, Gaudiano BA, et al. Hatha yoga for depression: Critical review of the evidence for efficacy, plausible mechanisms of action, and directions for future research. J Psychiatr Pract. 2010; 16: 22-33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hagins M, States R, Selfe T, Innes K. Effectiveness of yoga for hypertension: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013: 649836.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Jacobsen PB, Phillips KM, Jim HSL, et al. Effects of self-directed stress management training and home-based exercise on quality of life in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2012; 22: 1229-1235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Park CL, Gaffey AE. Relationships between psychosocial factors and health behavior change in cancer survivors: An integrative review. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 34: 115-134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Martire LM. The “relative” efficacy of involving family in psychosocial interventions for chronic illness: Are there added benefits to patients and family members? Fam Syst Health. 2005; 23: 312-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

SL is supported by a FRQS Research Scholar Award – Junior 1. This review was conducted in the context of a study funded by Prostate Cancer Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvie D. Lambert RN, BSc(N), PhD.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards

Authors Sylvie Lambert, Lindsay R. Duncan, Sophia Kapellas, Anne-Marie Bruson, Melanie Myrand, Daniel Santa Mina, Nicole Culos-Reed, and Angella Lambrou declare that they have no conflict of interest. As this is a review, ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000, do not apply.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic Supplementary Appendix S1

PRISMA Checklist (DOCX 22.6 kb)

Electronic Supplementary Appendix S2

Example of search strategy—Medline database (DOCX 487 kb)

Electronic Supplementary Appendix S3

Methodological quality of included studies (DOCX 36 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lambert, S.D., Duncan, L.R., Kapellas, S. et al. A Descriptive Systematic Review of Physical Activity Interventions for Caregivers: Effects on Caregivers’ and Care Recipients’ Psychosocial Outcomes, Physical Activity Levels, and Physical Health. ann. behav. med. 50, 907–919 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9819-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9819-3

Keywords

Navigation