Effects of Performance Versus Game-Based Mobile Applications on Response to Exercise
Given the popularity of mobile applications (apps) designed to increase exercise participation, it is important to understand their effects on psychological predictors of exercise behavior.
This study tested a performance feedback-based app compared to a game-based app to examine their effects on aspects of immediate response to an exercise bout.
Twenty-eight participants completed a 30-min treadmill run while using one of two randomly assigned mobile running apps: Nike + Running, a performance-monitoring app which theoretically induces an associative, goal-driven state, or Zombies Run!, an app which turns the experience of running into a virtual reality game, theoretically inducing dissociation from primary exercise goals.
The two conditions did not differ on primary motivational state outcomes; however, participants reported more associative attentional focus in the performance-monitoring app condition compared to more dissociative focus in the game-based app condition.
Game-based and performance-tracking running apps may not have differential effects on goal motivation during exercise. However, game-based apps may help recreational exercisers dissociate from exercise more readily. Increasing the enjoyment of an exercise bout through the development of new and innovative mobile technologies is an important avenue for future research.
KeywordsExercise Mobile apps Reversal theory Goals Motivation
Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards
Authors Arielle S. Gillman and Angela D. Bryan declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
- 1.Schoenborn CA, Adams PF, Peregoy JA. Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2008-2010. Vital Health Stat 10. 2013;(257):1-184.Google Scholar
- 2.American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.Google Scholar
- 3.Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ. Acute Aerobic Exercise And Affect: Current Status, Problems And Prospects Regarding Dose Response. Sport Med. 1999;28:337-374. http://0-search.proquest.com.libraries.colorado.edu/docview/18905611?accountid=14503.
- 8.Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
- 9.Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ. Not what, but how one feels: The measurement of affect during exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1989; 11(3): 304-317.Google Scholar
- 10.Baden DA, Warwick-Evans L, Lakomy J. Am I nearly there? The effect of anticipated running distance on perceived exertion and attentional focus. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004; 26(2): 215-231.Google Scholar
- 15.Kerr JH, Els Van den Wollenberg A. High and low intensity exercise and psychological mood states. Psychol Heal. 1997;12(5):603-618Google Scholar