Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 242–248 | Cite as

Why Do People High in Self-Control Eat More Healthily? Social Cognitions as Mediators

  • Nelli Hankonen
  • Marja Kinnunen
  • Pilvikki Absetz
  • Piia Jallinoja
Brief Report

Abstract

Background

Trait self-control and social cognitions both predict dietary behaviors, but whether self-control is associated with more beneficial diet-related cognitions, and the effect of self-control on diet mediated by them, has rarely been examined.

Purpose

We hypothesized that the effect of self-control on healthy diet is explained by more proximal diet-related social cognitive factors.

Methods

Altogether, 854 military conscripts (age M = 20) completed questionnaires on trait self-control and social cognitive factors (self-efficacy, outcome expectations, risk perceptions, intentions and planning) upon entering the service and a food frequency questionnaire after 8 weeks.

Results

Trait self-control was associated with more positive cognitions regarding healthy diet. The mediation hypothesis received support for fruit and vegetable but only partially for fast food consumption.

Conclusion

Individuals high in trait self-control eat more healthily because they have higher self-efficacy, more positive taste expectations, stronger intentions and more plans, compared to those low in self-control.

Keywords

Self-control Personality Social cognitions The Health Action Process Approach Mediation Dietary behaviors 

References

  1. 1.
    Martinez-Gonzalez MA, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Lopez-Del-Burgo C, Vazquez-Ruiz Z, Benito S, Ruiz-Canela M. Low consumption of fruit and vegetables and risk of chronic disease: A review of the epidemiological evidence and temporal trends among Spanish graduates. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 2309-2315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Oliveira Otto MC, Mozaffarian D, Kromhout D, et al. Dietary intake of saturated fat by food source and incident cardiovascular disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96: 397-404.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bingham CM, Lahti-Koski M, Absetz P, et al. Food choices and health during military service: Increases in sugar- and fibre-containing foods and changes in anthropometric and clinical risk factors. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 15: 1248-1255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pietinen P, Paturi M, Reinivuo H, Tapanainen H, Valsta LM. FINDIET 2007 Survey: Energy and nutrient intakes. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13: 920-924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004; 72: 271-324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mischel W, Ayduk O, Berman MG, et al. ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011; 6: 252-256.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kinnunen MI, Suihko J, Hankonen N, Absetz P, Jallinoja P. Self-control is associated with physical activity and fitness among young males. Behav Med. 2012; 38: 83-89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Junger M, van Kampen M. Cognitive ability and self-control in relation to dietary habits, physical activity and bodyweight in adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 22.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konttinen H, Haukkala A, Sarlio-Lähteenkorva S, Silventoinen K, Jousilahti P. Eating styles, self-control and obesity indicators. The moderating role of obesity status and dieting history on restrained eating. Appetite. 2009; 53: 131-134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wills TA, Isasi CR, Mendoza D, Ainette MG. Self-control constructs related to measures of dietary intake and physical activity in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 41: 551-558.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerrits JH, O’Hara RE, Piko BF, et al. Self-control, diet concerns and eater prototypes influence fatty foods consumption of adolescents in three countries. Health Educ Res. 2010; 25: 1031-1040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol Int Rev. 2008; 57: 1-29.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwarzer R, Schuz B, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Luszczynska A, Scholz U. Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 33: 156-166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutton S. Health behavior: Psychological theories. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, eds. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon; 2001: 6499-6506.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conner M, Abraham C. Conscientiousness and the theory of planned behavior: Toward a more complete model of the antecedents of intentious behavior. Person Soc Psychol Bull. 2001; 27: 1547-1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McEachan RR, Sutton S, Myers L. Mediation of personality influences on physical activity within the theory of planned behaviour. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15: 1170-1180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Defence Command Public Information Division. The Finnish Defence Forces Annual Report 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hankonen N, Absetz P, Kinnunen M, Haukkala A, Jallinoja P. Toward identifying a broader range of social cognitive determinants of dietary intentions and behaviors. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being. 2012; 5: 118-135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paalanen L, Mannisto S, Virtanen MJ, et al. Validity of a food frequency questionnaire varied by age and body mass index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59: 994-1001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bingham CM, Ovaskainen ML, Tapanainen H, Lahti-Koski M, Sahi T, Paturi M. Nutrient intake and food use of Finnish conscripts in garrison, on leave, and in encampment conditions. Mil Med. 2009; 174: 678-684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bingham CM, Lahti-Koski M, Puukka P, Kinnunen M, Jallinoja P, Absetz P. Effects of a healthy food supply intervention in a military setting: Positive changes in cereal, fat and sugar containing foods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jallinoja P, Tuorila H, Ojajarvi A, Bingham C, Uutela A, Absetz P. Conscripts’ attitudes towards health and eating. Changes during the military service and associations with eating. Appetite. 2011; 57: 718-721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford; 2005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Graham JW. Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009; 60: 549-576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    de Ridder DT, Lensvelt-Mulders G, Finkenauer C, Stok FM, Baumeister RF. Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012; 16: 76-99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bogg T, Roberts BW. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychol Bull. 2004; 130: 887-919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O’Connor DB, Conner M, Jones F, McMillan B, Ferguson E. Exploring the benefits of conscientiousness: An investigation of the role of daily stressors and health behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 37: 184-196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nelli Hankonen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marja Kinnunen
    • 2
  • Pilvikki Absetz
    • 2
  • Piia Jallinoja
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Social Psychology Unit, Department of Social ResearchUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.National Institute for Health and WelfareHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.National Consumer Research CentreHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations