Consistency and Timing of Marital Transitions and Survival During Midlife: the Role of Personality and Health Risk Behaviors
- 871 Downloads
Marital status is associated with survival.
The aims of this study are to evaluate marital history and timing on mortality during midlife, test the role of pre-marital personality, and quantify the role of health risk behaviors.
Cox proportional hazard models were run with varying classifications of marital history and sets of covariates.
In fully adjusted models compared to the currently married, lifetime marital history predicts premature mortality with never married at 2.33 times risk of death and ever married at 1.64 risk of death. Midlife marital history shows that not having a partner during midlife (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.10 formerly married; HR = 2.59 remaining single) has the highest risk of death. Controlling for personality and health risk behaviors reduces but does not eliminate the impact of marital status.
Consistency of marital status during midlife suggests that lack of a partner is associated with midlife mortality.
KeywordsMarital history Midlife mortality Longitudinal study UNC Alumni Heart Study
This study has been funded by Marchionne Foundation, R01-HL55356 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute with co-funding from the National Institute on Aging, R01 AG12458 from the National Institute on Aging, P01 HL36587 from National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and from the Duke Behavioral Medicine Research Center. We would like to thank Christin Ogle for her comments on this manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
- 1.Internal Revenue Service. Publication 590. Table 1. Single Life Expectancy. 2009: P. 90.Google Scholar
- 2.Heron M, Hoyert DL, Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Tejada-Vera BS. Deaths: Final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57(14):11-12. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_14.pdf. Accessibility verified October 10, 2011.Google Scholar
- 8.Carstensen LL, Hartel CR, eds. When I’m 64. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 12.Williams RB. Psychological factors, health and disease: The impact of aging and the lifecycle. In: Manuck SB, Jennings R, Rabin BS, Baum A, eds. Behavior, health and aging. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000:135-151.Google Scholar
- 15.Hooker K, Hoppmann C, Siegler IC. Personality: Life span compass for health. In: Whitfield KE, ed. Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Focus on behavioral prospective on health in later life. New York: Springer; 2010:201-232.Google Scholar
- 18.Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. Booklet for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1943.Google Scholar
- 19.Dahlstrom WG, Welsh GS, Dahlstrom LE. An MMPI handbook: Research applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1975.Google Scholar
- 23.Maruta T, Colligan RC, Malinchoc M, Offord KP. Optimists vs. pessimists: Survival rate among medical patients over a 30-year period. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;75:140-143.Google Scholar
- 30.SAS v. 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary NC.Google Scholar
- 33.U. S. Census. Selected characteristics of Baby Boomers 42–60 years old in 2006. Available at http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/age/2006%20Baby%20Boomers.pdf. Accessibility verified November 10, 2010.
- 34.Merrill SS, Verbrugge LM. Health and disease at midlife. In: Willis SL, Reid JD, eds. Life in the Middle. San Diego: Academic; 1999:78-103.Google Scholar
- 38.Brodhead WE, Kaplan BH, James SA, et al. The epidemiologic evidence for a relationship between social support and health. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:521-537.Google Scholar
- 40.Croezen S, Havenman-Nies A, Picavet HSJ, et al. Positive and negative experiences of social support and long-term mortality among middle aged Dutch people. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 173–179.Google Scholar