Future Time Perspective and Health Behaviors: Temporal Framing of Self-Regulatory Processes in Physical Exercise and Dietary Behaviors
Limitations in perceived lifetime can undermine long-term goal striving. Planning is supposed to translate intentions into health behaviors and to operate as a compensatory strategy to overcome goal striving deficits associated with a limited time perspective.
Two longitudinal studies were conducted examining the compensatory role of planning: an online survey on fruit and vegetable consumption (N = 909; 16–78 years; follow-up at 4 months) and a questionnaire study on physical exercise in older adults (N = 289; 60–95 years, over a half-year period).
Intentions, planning, and behavior were measured in a behavior-specific, future time perspective in a generic manner.
Planning mediated between intentions and both health behaviors. Time perspective operated as a moderator, indicating that in individuals with a more limited time perspective, a stronger effect of planning on health behaviors emerged.
Planning as a self-regulatory strategy may compensate for a limited time perspective.
KeywordsFuture time perspective Planning Self-regulation Physical exercise Fruit and vegetable intake
This work has been supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project Fostering Lifelong Autonomy and Resources in Europe: Behaviour and Successful Aging—FLARE-BSA (project ID 01ET0801). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
None of the authors of the above article has declared any actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
- 17.Oettingen G, Gollwitzer PM: Strategies of setting and implementing goals: Mental contrasting and implementation intentions. In J. E. Maddux and J. P. Tangney (eds), Social psychological foundations of clinical psychology. New York: Guilford, 2010, 114–135.Google Scholar
- 20.Keough KA, Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN: Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1999, 21:149–164.Google Scholar
- 27.Luszczynska A, Gibbons FX, Piko BF, Tekozel M: Self-regulatory cognitions, social comparison, and perceived peers’ behaviors as predictors of nutrition and physical activity: A comparison among adolescents in Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and USA. Psychology & Health. 2004, 19:577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Salthouse TA: Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.Google Scholar
- 35.Carstensen LL, Lang FR: Future time perspective scale. Unpublished manuscript. 1996: Stanford University.Google Scholar
- 36.Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User’s Guide, 5th Edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén, 1998–2007.Google Scholar
- 38.Aiken LS, West SG: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park: Sage, 1991.Google Scholar
- 39.Huy C, Schneider S: Instrument für die Erfassung der physischen Aktivität bei Personen im mittleren und höheren Erwachsenenalter. Entwicklung, Prüfung und Anwendung des “German-PAQ-50 +” [Instrument for the assessment of middle-aged and older adults’ physical activity: Design, reliability and application of the German-PAQ-50+]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2008, 41:208–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar