Advertisement

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 310–323 | Cite as

Outcomes from a Multiple Risk Factor Diabetes Self-Management Trial for Latinas: ¡Viva Bien!

  • Deborah J. Toobert
  • Lisa A. Strycker
  • Manuel BarreraJr.
  • Diego Osuna
  • Diane K. King
  • Russell E. Glasgow
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Culturally appropriate interventions are needed to assist Latinas in making multiple healthful lifestyle changes.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to test a cultural adaptation of a successful multiple health behavior change program, ¡Viva Bien!

Methods

Random assignment of 280 Latinas with type 2 diabetes to usual care only or to usual care + ¡Viva Bien!, which included group meetings for building skills to promote the Mediterranean diet, physical activity, stress management, supportive resources, and smoking cessation.

Results

¡Viva Bien! participants compared to usual care significantly improved psychosocial and behavioral outcomes (fat intake, stress management practice, physical activity, and social–environmental support) at 6 months, and some improvements were maintained at 12 months. Biological improvements included hemoglobin A1c and heart disease risk factors.

Conclusions

The ¡Viva Bien! multiple lifestyle behavior program was effective in improving psychosocial, behavioral, and biological/quality of life outcomes related to heart health for Latinas with type 2 diabetes (ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00233259).

Keywords

Latina Diabetes Multiple behavior change Self-management Randomized controlled trial 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL077120). We acknowledge the invaluable contributions of the assessment and intervention staffs of the ¡Viva Bien! project, including Cristy Geno Rasmussen, Alyssa Doty, Fabio Almeida, Sara Hoerlein, Carmen Martin, Angela Casola, Eve Halterman, and Breanne A. Griffin. We are deeply indebted to the 280 dedicated and committed women who participated in the study.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Elley CR, Kenealy T, Robinson E, Drury PL. Glycated haemoglobin and cardiovascular outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: A large prospective cohort study. Diabet Med 2008;25:1295–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pandey DK, Labarthe DR, Goff DC, Chan W, Nichaman MZ. Community-wide coronary heart disease mortality in Mexican Americans equals or exceeds that in non-Hispanic Whites: The Corpus Christi Heart Project. Am J Med 2001;10:81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt KJ, Williams K, Resendez RG, Hazuda HP, Hagberg JM, Stern MP. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality among diabetic participants in the San Antonio Heart Study: Evidence against the “Hispanic Paradox.” Diabetes Care 2002;26:1557–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slater J, Selzer F, Dorbala S, et al. Ethnic differences in the presentation, treatment strategy, and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry). Am J Cardiology 2003;92:773–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288:1723–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maskarinec G, Grandinetti A, Matsuura G, et al. Diabetes prevalence and body mass index differ by ethnicity: The multiethnic cohort. Ethn Dis 2009;19:49–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lanas F, Avezum A, Bautista LE, et al. Risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in Latin America. The INTERHEART Latin American Study. Circulation 2007;115:1067–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richardson CR, Kriska AM, Lantz PM, Hayward RA. Physical activity and mortality across cardiovascular disease risk groups. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:1923–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiuve SE, McCullough ML, Sacks FM, Rimm EB. Healthy lifestyle factors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease among men: Benefits among users and nonusers of lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive medications. Circulation 2006;114;160–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, et al. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation 2006;114; 82–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1993;270: 2207–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE. Lifestyle change in women with coronary heart disease: What do we know? J Womens Health 1998;7:685–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown SA, Garcia AA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL. Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: The Starr County Border Health Initiative. Diabetes Care 2002;25:259–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Livingston G, Minushkin S, Cohn D. Hispanics and health care in the United States: Access, information and knowledge, 2008. Available at http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/91.pdf. Accessibility verified March 18, 2010.
  16. 16.
    Ward MM. Access to care and the incidence of end-stage renal disease due to diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1032–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gallo LC, Espinosa de los Monteros K, Ferent V, Urbina J, Talavera G. Education, psychosocial resources, and metabolic syndrome variables in Latinas. Ann Behav Med 2007;34:14–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports, P60-236, income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2008, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Health, United States, 2008. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2009. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus08.pdf. Accessibility verified March 18, 2010.
  20. 20.
    Whitfield KE, Clark R, Weidner G, Anderson NB. Sociodemographic diversity and behavior medicine. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:463–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saydah S, Cowie C, Eberhardt MS, De Rekeneire N, Narayan, KM. Race and ethnic differences in glycemic control among adults with diagnosed diabetes in the United States. Ethn Dis 2007;17:529–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2008. Projections of resident population by race, Hispanic origin and nativity, middle series, 2008–2050. Available at http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html. Accessibility verified March 18, 2010.
  23. 23.
    Sarkisian CA, Brown AF, Norris KC, Wintz RL, Mangione CMA. Systematic review of diabetes self-care interventions for older, African American, or Latino adults. Diab Educ 2003;29:467–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osuna D, Barrera M Jr, Strycker LA, et al. Methods for the cultural adaptation of a diabetes lifestyle intervention for Latinas: An illustrative project. Health Promot Pract. doi: 10.1177/1524839909343279
  25. 25.
    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Barrera M, Angell K. Effects of the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program on multiple risk behaviors and psychosocial outcomes among women at risk for heart disease. Ann Behav Med 2005;29:128–37. PMCID: PMC 1557654.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, et al. Biologic and quality of life outcomes from the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care, 2003;26:2288–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, et al. ¡Viva Bien!: Overcoming recruitment challenges in a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial. Am J Health Behav 2010;34:432–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glasgow RE, Mullan J, Fisher L, Toobert DJ, Skaff M. Problem-solving and diabetes self-management: Investigation in a large, multiracial sample. Diabetes Care 2007;30:33–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barrera M Jr, Strycker LA, MacKinnon DP, Toobert DJ. (2008). Social-ecological resources as mediators of two-year diet and physical activity outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients. Health Psychol 2008;27:S118–S125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Williams DM. Social cognitive mediators of change in a group randomized nutrition and physical activity intervention: Social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-regulation in the Guide-to-Health Trial. J Health Psychol 2010;15:21–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diabetes Prevention Program Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or Metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lindstrom J, IIanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: Follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. The Lancet 2006;368:1673–1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roumen C, Corpeleijn E, Feskens EJM, et al. Impact of 3-year lifestyle intervention on postprandial glucose metabolism: The SLIM study. Diabet Med 2008;25:597–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Villareal DT, Miller III BV, Banks M, et al. Effect of lifestyle intervention on metabolic coronary heart disease risk factors in obese older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:1317–1323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Welborn TA, Garcia-Webb P, Bonser A, et al. Clinical criteria that reflect c-peptide status in idiopathic diabetes. Diabetes Care 1983;6:315–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barrera M Jr, Toobert DJ, Strycker L, Osuna D. (2010). Adaptation of a lifestyle change intervention for Latinas with type 2 diabetes. In G Bernal and MM Domenech Rodriguez (Eds.), Cultural Adaptations: Tools for Evidence-Based Practice with Diverse Populations. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mier N, Ory MG, Medina AA. Anatomy of culturally sensitive interventions promoting nutrition and exercise in Hispanics: A critical examination of existing literature. Health Promot Pract 2010;11:541–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Barrera M, Strycker LA. Assessment of problem solving: A key to successful diabetes self-management. J Behav Med 2004;27:477–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Gillette CD. Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diab Spectrum 2001;14:33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schwarzer R, Dunkel-Schetter C, Kemeny ME. The multidimensional nature of received social support in gay men at risk of HIV infection and AIDS. Am J Community Psychol 1994;22:319–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Patterson RE, Kristal A, Tinker LF, et al. Measurement characteristics of the Women’s Health Initiative Food Frequency Questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 1999;9:178–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Craig CL, Marchall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1381–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Toobert DJ, Eakin E. A social-ecologic approach to assessing support for disease self-management: The Chronic Illness Resources Survey. J Behav Med 2000; 23:559–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eakin EG, Reeves MM, Bull SS, et al. Validation of the Spanish language version of the Chronic Illness Resources Survey. Int J Behav Med 2007;14:76–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Martinez SM, Ainsworth BE, Elder JP. A review of physical activity measures used among US Latinos: Guidelines for developing culturally appropriate measures. Ann Behav Med 2008;36:195–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kristal AR, Feng Z, Coates RJ, Oberman A, George V. Associations of race/ethnicity, education, and dietary intervention with the validity and reliability of the food frequency questionnaire: The women’s health trial feasibility study in minority populations. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:856–869.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Collins NL, Dunkel-Schetter C, Lobel M, Scrimshaw SCM. Social support in pregnancy: Psychosocial correlates of birth outcomes and postpartum depression. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:1243–1258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rini C, Dunkel-Schetter C, Hobel CJ, Glynn LM, Sandman CJ. Effective social support: Antecedents and consequences of partner support during pregnancy. Pers Relat 2006;13:207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measuring healthy days: Population assessment of health-related quality of life, 2000. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/monograph.htm. Accessibility verified March 18, 2010.
  50. 50.
    Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM, Holman RR. The UKPDS risk engine: A model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci 2001;101:671–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Srimanunthiphol J, Beddow R, Arakaki R. A review of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and a discussion of the implications for patient care. Hawaii Med J 2000;59:295–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lowensteyn I, Joseph L, Levinton C, et al. Can computerized risk profiles help patients improve their coronary risk? The results of the Coronary Health Assessment Study (CHAS). Prev Med 1998;27:730–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bove AA. The president’s page: Longevity, prevention, and health care reform. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:956–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ornish D. Intensive lifestyle changes and health reform. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:638–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical atherapy with or without PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Venditti EM, Bray GA, Carrion-Petersen ML, et al. First versus repeat treatment with a lifestyle intervention program: Attendance and weight loss outcomes. Int J Obes 2008;32:1537–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schulz U, Pischke CR, Weidner G, et al. Social support group attendance is related to blood pressure, health behaviours, and quality of life in the Multicenter Lifestyle Demonstration Project. Psychol Health Med 2008;13:423–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah J. Toobert
    • 1
  • Lisa A. Strycker
    • 1
  • Manuel BarreraJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  • Diego Osuna
    • 3
  • Diane K. King
    • 3
  • Russell E. Glasgow
    • 4
  1. 1.Oregon Research InstituteEugeneUSA
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente ColoradoDenverUSA
  4. 4.Dissemination and Implementation Science, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer InstituteRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations