Skip to main content
Log in

Heart Disease Occurs in a Biological, Psychological, and Social Matrix: Cardiac Risk Factors, Symptom Presentation, and Recovery as Illustrative Examples

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Despite the basic premise of behavioral medicine that understanding and treatment of physical well-being require a full appreciation of the confluence of micro-, molar-, and macro-variables, the field tends to focus on linear, causal relationships. In this paper, we argue that more attention be given to a dynamic matrix approach, which assumes that biological, psychological, and social elements are interconnected and continually influence each other (consistent with the biopsychosocial model). To illustrate, the authors draw from their independent and collaborative research programs on overlapping cardiac risk factors, symptom interpretation, and treatment delay for cardiac care and recovery from heart disease. “Cabling” across biological, psychological, and social variables is considered as a transformative strategy for medicine and the other health-related disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Factors related bidirectionally influence each other. Variable A influences B and B influences A. An example from physics is: For a fixed volume, an increase in temperature will cause an increase in pressure; likewise, increased pressure will cause an increase in temperature.

References

  1. Heron MP, Hoyert DL, Murphy SL, et al. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2009; 57 Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2010 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2010; 121:e1–e170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Center for Health Statistics Health, United States, 2008 With Chartbook Hyattsville, MD: 2009

  4. Engel, B. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz G. Testing the biopsychosocial model: The ultimate challenge facing behavioral medicine. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982; 50: 1040–1050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Suls J, Rothman, A. Evolution of the biopsychosocial model: Prospects and challenges for health psychology. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 119–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Heart Association, 2007 Heart and Stroke Statistics: 2007 Update. At a glance. Dallas, TX. Author.

  8. Rozanski A, Blumenthal J, Kaplan J. Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. N Engl J Med. 1999; 99:2192–2217.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman HS, Booth-Kewley S. The “Disease-Prone personality.” Am Psychol. 1987; 42: 539–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frasure-Smith N Lesperance, F. Depression and other psychological risks following myocardial infarction. Arch Gen. Psychiatry. 2003; 60: 627–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carney R Rich, M. Freedland K et al. Major depressive disorder predicts cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med. 1988; 50: 627-633.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davidson K, Kupfer D, Bigger J, et al. Assessment and treatment of depression in patients with cardiovascular disease: National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Working Group Report. Ann Behav Med. 2006; 32;121–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rugulies R Depression as a predictor for coronary heart disease: A review and meta-analysis. Am J of Prevent Med. 2002; 23: 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wulsin L, Singal B. Do depressive symptoms increase the risk for onset of coronary disease? A systematic quantitative review. Psychsom Med. 2003; 65: 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Writing Committee for the ENRICHD Investigators. Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 2003; 289: 3106–3116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawachi I, Sparrow D, Vokonas P, & Weiss, S. Symptoms of anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease: The Normative Aging Study. Circulation. 1994; 90: 2225–2229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matthews K. Coronary Heart Disease and Type A Behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987) quantitative review. Psychol Bull. 1988; 3: 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barefoot J, Dodge K, Peterson B, Dahlstrom W et al. The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosom Med. 1989; 51: 46–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith TW Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychol. 1992: 11:139–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krantz D, Manuck, S. Acute psychophysiological reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodological critique. Psychol Bull. 1984; 96: 435–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kop WJ. The integration of cardiovascular behavioral medicine and psychoneuroimmunology: New developments based on converging research fields. Brain, Behav Immunity. 2003; 17: 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clark L A. The anxiety and depressive disorders: Descriptive psychopathology and differential diagnosis. In Kendall P, Watson D, eds Anxiety and Depression: Distinctive and Overlapping Features. San Diego: Academic; 1989: 83–129.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mineka S, Watson D, Clark, L A. Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Ann Rev Psychol.1998; 49: 377–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fawcett J, Kravitz, H. Anxiety syndromes and their relationships to depressive illness. J of Clin Psychiatry. 1983; 44: 8–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Suls J, Bunde J. Anger, anxiety and depression as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: The problems and implications of overlapping affective disposition. Psychol Bull. 2005; 131: 260–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin R & Watson D Style of anger expression and its relation to daily experience. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1997; 23: 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Watson DA, Clark LA (1984) Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience negative emotional states. Psychol Bull. 1984;96: 465–490.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Costa, P T, McCrae R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kop WJ. Chronic and acute psychological risk factors for clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med. 1999; 61: 476–487.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smyth J., Stone, A. Ecological momentary assessment research in behavioral medicine. J Happiness Stud. 203; 4: 35–52, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luger T, Lamkin D, Suls J. Relationship between depression and smoking: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, 2010.

  32. Bunde, J, Suls J. A quantitative synthesis of the relationship between the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and traditional CHD risk factors. Health Psychol. 2006; 25: 493–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Engelberg H. Low serum cholesterol and suicide. Lancet. 1992;339:727–729.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Manfredini R, Caracciolom S, Salmi R, et al. The association of low serum cholesterol with depression and suicidal behaviors. J Int Med Res. 2000; 28: 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. Role of cytokines in inducing hyperlipidemia. Diabetes. 1992; 41 Suppl. 2: 97–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shin J-Y, Suls J, Martin R. Are cholesterol and depression inversely related? A meta-analysis of the association between two cardiac risk factors. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 36; 33-43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Angell, M. Disease as a reflection of the psyche. N Engl J Med. 1992:1570–1572. American Heart Association, 2007).

  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disparities in Adult Awareness of Heart Attack Warning Signs and Symptoms—14 States, 2005. MMWR. 2008; 57:175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Turi Z, Stone P, Muller et al. Implications for acute intervention related to time of hospital arrival in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardio. 1986; 58: 203-209

  40. Anand S, Xie C, Mehta S et al. Differences in the management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll. Cardio. 2005; 46: 1845–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dracup K, Alonzo A, Atkins J et al. The physician’s role in minimizing pre-hospital delay in patients at risk of acute myocardial infarction: Recommendations for the National Heart Attack Alert Program. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126:645–651.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Merz, CNB, Kelsey F, Pepine C, et al. The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Protocol design, feasibility. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 1453–1461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mosca L, Mochari-Greenberger H, Dolor RJ et al. Twelve-year follow-up of American women's awareness of cardiovascular disease risk and barriers to heart health. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3:118–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shumaker S., Smith, T. Women and coronary heart disease: A psychological perspective. In Stanton A, Gallant S, eds. The Psychology of Women's Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1995; 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wingard, D. L., Cohn, B. A., Cirillo, P. M., Cohen, R. D., & Kaplan, G. A. (1992). Gender differences in self-reported heart disease morbidity: Are intervention opportunities missed for women. J Women's Health. 1, 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Martin R, Gordon E, Lounsbury P. Gender disparities in the attribution of cardiac-related symptoms: Contributions of common-sense models of illness. Health Psychol. 1998;17:346–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Murdaugh C. Coronary artery disease in women. J of Cardiovascular Nurs. 1990;4: 35–50,

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hirsch, G, Meagher D. Women and coronary artery disease. Health Care for Women International. 1984; 5: 299–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Friedman M, Rosenman R. Type A Behavior and Your Heart. NY; Knopf: 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The commonsense representation of illness danger. In Rachman S, ed. Medical psychology (vol. 2), NY: Pergamon Press; 1980: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Martin R, Lemos K. From heart attacks to melanoma: Do common-sense models of somatization influence symptom interpretation for female victims? Health Psychol. 2002; 21; 25–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Martin R, Lemos K, Rothrock N. et al. Gender disparities in commonsense models of illness among myocardial infarction victims. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 345–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mechanic D. Social psychological factors affecting the presentation of bodily complaints. N Engl J Med. 1971; 286:1132–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pennebaker J. Psychology of Physical Symptoms. NY; Springer-Verlag: 1982

    Google Scholar 

  55. DeVon H, Ryan C, Ochs et al al. Symptoms across the continuum of acute coronary syndromes: Differences between women and men. Am J Crit Care. 2008; 17: 14–24.

  56. Canto J, Goldberg R, Hand M et al. Symptom presentation of women with acute coronary syndromes. Arch Int Med. 2007; 167: 2405–2413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shin J-Y, Martin R, Suls J. Meta-analytic evaluation of gender differences and symptom management strategies in acute coronary syndromes. Heart & Lung. 2010; 39: 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shin J-Y, Martin R, Howren M.B. Influence of assessment methods on reports of gender differences in AMI symptoms. West J Nurs Res. 2009; 31: 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dusseldorp E, van Elderen T, Maes S, et al. A meta-analysis of psychoeducational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 506–519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. American College of Physicians. Position: Cardiac rehabilitation services. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 109: 650–663.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hafstrom J, Schram V. Chronic illness in couples: Selected characteristics including wife’s satisfaction with and perception of marital relationships. Fam Relations. 1984; 33: 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Boogard M, Briody M. Comparison of the rehabilitation of men and women post-myocardial infarction. J Cardiopul Rehabil. 1985;5: 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Revenson T. Social support and marital coping with chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 1994; 16: 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rose G, Suls J, Green P et al. Comparisons of adjustment, activity, and tangible social support in men and women patients and their spouses during the 6-months post-myocardial infarction. Ann Behav Med. 1996; 18: 264–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Lemos K, Suls J, Jenson M et al. How do female and male cardiac patients and their spouses share responsibilities after discharge from the hospital? Ann Behav Med. 2003; 25: 8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hellerstein H, Franklin F (1984) Exercise testing and prescription. In Wenger N, Hellerstein H, eds. Rehabilitation of the Coronary Patient (2nd Ed.) NY: Wiley; 1984: 197–284.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jenson M, Suls J, Lemos K. A comparison of physical activity in men and women with cardiac disease: Do gender roles complicate recovery? Women & Health. 2003; 37: 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ainsworth B, Haskel W, Leon A, et al. Compendium of physical activities: Classsification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med & Science in Sports Exercise. 1993; 25: 71–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs (3rd ed). Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics: 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gilligan C. In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. 1982. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry Suls Ph.D..

Additional information

This study is based on a Master Lecture delivered by J. Suls at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Seattle, Washington. Research described here was supported by NIA AG024159 to JS, NIR 009292 to RM, and AHA 071001Z. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

About this article

Cite this article

Suls, J., Martin, R. Heart Disease Occurs in a Biological, Psychological, and Social Matrix: Cardiac Risk Factors, Symptom Presentation, and Recovery as Illustrative Examples. ann. behav. med. 41, 164–173 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9244-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9244-y

Keywords

Navigation