Abstract
Background
Relationships have been linked to significant physical health outcomes. However, little is known about the more specific processes that might be responsible for such links.
Purpose
The main aim of this study was to examine a previously unexplored and potentially important form of partner knowledge (i.e., attitude familiarity) on relationship processes and cardiovascular function.
Methods
In this study, 47 married couples completed an attitude familiarity questionnaire and ambulatory assessments of daily spousal interactions and blood pressure.
Results
Attitude familiarity was associated with better interpersonal functioning between spouses in daily life (e.g., greater partner responsiveness). Importantly, attitude familiarity was also related to lower overall ambulatory systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.
Conclusions
These data suggest that familiarity with a spouse’s attitudes may be an important factor linking relationships to better interpersonal and physical health outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We thank the reviewers for this excellent suggestion.
References
Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., and Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med, 51, 843-857.
Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. Am Psychol, 59, 676-684.
Uchino, B.N. (2004). Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of our relationships. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol, 88, 480-497.
Swann, W. B., Jr., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. J Pers Soc Psychol, 66, 857-869.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opin Q, 24, 163-204.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction in visual attention. J Pers Soc Psychol, 63, 198-211
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol, 59, 614-622.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol Rev, 84, 888-918.
Blascovich, J., Ernst, J. M., Tomaka, J., Kelsey, R. M., Salomon, K. L., & Fazio, R. H. (1993). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of autonomic reactivity during decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol, 64, 165-176.
Fazio, R. H., & Powell, M. C. (1997). On the value of knowing one’s likes and dislikes: Attitude Accessibility, stress, and health in college. Psychol Sci, 8, 430-436.
Swann, W.B. (2010). Self-verification theory. In P. Van Lang, A. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage (in press).
Neff, L. A. & Karney, B. R. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skills or responsiveness? J Pers Soc Psychol, 88, 79-90.
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Uchino, B.N., & Wong, K. (2010). Familiarity breeds contempt? The role of knowledge of partners attitudes in relationship functioning. Unpublished manuscript.
De Vogli, R., Chandola, T., & Marmot, M.G. (2007). Negative aspects of close relationships and heart disease. Arch Intern Med, 167, 1951-1957.
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T.B., Layton, B. (2010). Social Relationships and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS Med, 7, 1-20.
Matthews, K.A., & Gump, B.B. (2002). Chronic work stress and marital dissolution increase risk of post-trial mortality in men from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Arch Intern Med, 162, 309-315.
Barth, J., Schneider, S., & von Kanel, R. (2010). Lack of social support in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med, 72, 229-238.
Berkman, L.F., Leo-Summers, L., & Horwitz, R.I. (1992). Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction: A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med, 117, 1003-1009.
Pickering, T.G., Shimbo, D., & Haas, D. (2006). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. N Engl J Med, 354, 2368-2374.
Cacioppo, J.T., Malarkey, W.B., Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., Uchino, B.N., Sgoutas-Emch, S.A., Sheridan, J.F., Berntson, G.G., & Glaser, R. (1995). Heterogeneity in neuroendocrine and immune responses to brief psychological stressors as a function of autonomic cardiac activation. Psychosom Med, 57, 154-164.
Weiss, H.M., Beal, D.J., Lucy, S.L., & MacDermid, S.M. (2004). Constructing EMA studies with PMAT: The Purdue Momentary Assessment Tool User's Manual. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Military Family Research Institute.
Kamarck, T. (1992). Recent developments in the study of cardiovascular reactivity: Contributions from psychometric theory and social psychology. Psychophysiology, 29, 491-503.
Goodwin, J., Bilous, M., Winship, S., Finn, P. & Jones, S.C. (2007). Validation of the Oscar 2 oscillometric 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit, 12, 113-117.
Marler, M.R., Jacob, R.G., Lehoczky, J.P., & Shapiro, A.P. (1988). The statistical analysis of treatment effects in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Stat Med, 7, 697-716.
Kamarck, T.W., Shiffman, S.M., Smithline, L., Goodie, J.L., Paty, J.A., Gnys, M., & Yi-Kuan, J.J. (1998). Effects of task strain, social conflict, and emotional activation on ambulatory cardiovascular activity: Daily life consequences of recurring stress in a multiethnic adult sample. Health Psychol, 17, 17-29.
Laurenceau, J.P., Feldman-Barrett, L., & Rovine, M.J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. J Fam Psychol, 19, 314-323.
Campo, R.A., Uchino, B.N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Vaughn, A.A., Reblin, M., & Smith, T.W. (2009). The Assessment of Positivity and Negativity in Social Networks: The Reliability and Validity of the Social Relationships Index. J Community Psychol, 37, 471-486.
Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol, 60, 895-910.
Reis, H.T. & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interactions with the Rochester interaction record. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Adv Exp Soc Psychol (pp. 269-318). New York: Academic Press.
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol, 50, 229-238.
Luo, S. & Klohnen, E.C. (2005). Assortive mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple centered approach. J Pers Soc Psychol, 88, 304-326.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. J Pers Soc Psychol, 60, 241-253.
Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Schwartz, J.E. & Stone, A.A. (1998). Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychol, 17, 6-16.
Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat, 23, 323-355.
Nezlek, J.B. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Soc and Pers Psychol Comp, 2, 842-860.
Park, T. & Lee, Y.J. (2002). Covariance models for nested repeated measures data: Analysis of ovarian steroid secretion data. Stat Med, 21, 143-164.
Galecki, A.J. (1994). General class of covariance structures for two or more repeated factors in longitudinal data analysis. Communications Stat, 23, 3105-3119.
Cambell, L. & Kashy, D.A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Pers Relatsh, 9, 327-342.
Eisenberger, N.I., Gable, S.L., & Lieberman, M.D. (2007). Functional magnetic resonance imaging responses relate to differences in real-world social experience. Emotion, 7, 745-754.
Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a mediator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. J Pers Soc Psychol, 51, 505-514.
Snyder, D.K., Castellani, A.M., & Whisman, M.A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annu Rev Psychol, 57, 317-344.
Acknowledgments
This research was generously supported by grants R01 HL68862 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
David M. Sanbonmatsu and Bert N. Uchino are co-first author.
About this article
Cite this article
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Uchino, B.N. & Birmingham, W. On the Importance of Knowing Your Partner’s Views: Attitude Familiarity is Associated with Better Interpersonal Functioning and Lower Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Daily Life. ann. behav. med. 41, 131–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9234-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9234-0