Skip to main content
Log in

On the Importance of Knowing Your Partner’s Views: Attitude Familiarity is Associated with Better Interpersonal Functioning and Lower Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Daily Life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Relationships have been linked to significant physical health outcomes. However, little is known about the more specific processes that might be responsible for such links.

Purpose

The main aim of this study was to examine a previously unexplored and potentially important form of partner knowledge (i.e., attitude familiarity) on relationship processes and cardiovascular function.

Methods

In this study, 47 married couples completed an attitude familiarity questionnaire and ambulatory assessments of daily spousal interactions and blood pressure.

Results

Attitude familiarity was associated with better interpersonal functioning between spouses in daily life (e.g., greater partner responsiveness). Importantly, attitude familiarity was also related to lower overall ambulatory systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusions

These data suggest that familiarity with a spouse’s attitudes may be an important factor linking relationships to better interpersonal and physical health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank the reviewers for this excellent suggestion.

References

  1. Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., and Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med, 51, 843-857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. Am Psychol, 59, 676-684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uchino, B.N. (2004). Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of our relationships. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol, 88, 480-497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swann, W. B., Jr., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. J Pers Soc Psychol, 66, 857-869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opin Q, 24, 163-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction in visual attention. J Pers Soc Psychol, 63, 198-211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol, 59, 614-622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol Rev, 84, 888-918.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blascovich, J., Ernst, J. M., Tomaka, J., Kelsey, R. M., Salomon, K. L., & Fazio, R. H. (1993). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of autonomic reactivity during decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol, 64, 165-176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fazio, R. H., & Powell, M. C. (1997). On the value of knowing one’s likes and dislikes: Attitude Accessibility, stress, and health in college. Psychol Sci, 8, 430-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swann, W.B. (2010). Self-verification theory. In P. Van Lang, A. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage (in press).

  13. Neff, L. A. & Karney, B. R. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skills or responsiveness? J Pers Soc Psychol, 88, 79-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Uchino, B.N., & Wong, K. (2010). Familiarity breeds contempt? The role of knowledge of partners attitudes in relationship functioning. Unpublished manuscript.

  15. De Vogli, R., Chandola, T., & Marmot, M.G. (2007). Negative aspects of close relationships and heart disease. Arch Intern Med, 167, 1951-1957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T.B., Layton, B. (2010). Social Relationships and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS Med, 7, 1-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matthews, K.A., & Gump, B.B. (2002). Chronic work stress and marital dissolution increase risk of post-trial mortality in men from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Arch Intern Med, 162, 309-315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barth, J., Schneider, S., & von Kanel, R. (2010). Lack of social support in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med, 72, 229-238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berkman, L.F., Leo-Summers, L., & Horwitz, R.I. (1992). Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction: A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med, 117, 1003-1009.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickering, T.G., Shimbo, D., & Haas, D. (2006). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. N Engl J Med, 354, 2368-2374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cacioppo, J.T., Malarkey, W.B., Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., Uchino, B.N., Sgoutas-Emch, S.A., Sheridan, J.F., Berntson, G.G., & Glaser, R. (1995). Heterogeneity in neuroendocrine and immune responses to brief psychological stressors as a function of autonomic cardiac activation. Psychosom Med, 57, 154-164.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss, H.M., Beal, D.J., Lucy, S.L., & MacDermid, S.M. (2004). Constructing EMA studies with PMAT: The Purdue Momentary Assessment Tool User's Manual. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Military Family Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kamarck, T. (1992). Recent developments in the study of cardiovascular reactivity: Contributions from psychometric theory and social psychology. Psychophysiology, 29, 491-503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goodwin, J., Bilous, M., Winship, S., Finn, P. & Jones, S.C. (2007). Validation of the Oscar 2 oscillometric 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit, 12, 113-117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marler, M.R., Jacob, R.G., Lehoczky, J.P., & Shapiro, A.P. (1988). The statistical analysis of treatment effects in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Stat Med, 7, 697-716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamarck, T.W., Shiffman, S.M., Smithline, L., Goodie, J.L., Paty, J.A., Gnys, M., & Yi-Kuan, J.J. (1998). Effects of task strain, social conflict, and emotional activation on ambulatory cardiovascular activity: Daily life consequences of recurring stress in a multiethnic adult sample. Health Psychol, 17, 17-29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laurenceau, J.P., Feldman-Barrett, L., & Rovine, M.J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. J Fam Psychol, 19, 314-323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Campo, R.A., Uchino, B.N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Vaughn, A.A., Reblin, M., & Smith, T.W. (2009). The Assessment of Positivity and Negativity in Social Networks: The Reliability and Validity of the Social Relationships Index. J Community Psychol, 37, 471-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol, 60, 895-910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reis, H.T. & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interactions with the Rochester interaction record. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Adv Exp Soc Psychol (pp. 269-318). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol, 50, 229-238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo, S. & Klohnen, E.C. (2005). Assortive mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple centered approach. J Pers Soc Psychol, 88, 304-326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. J Pers Soc Psychol, 60, 241-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schwartz, J.E. & Stone, A.A. (1998). Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychol, 17, 6-16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat, 23, 323-355.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nezlek, J.B. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Soc and Pers Psychol Comp, 2, 842-860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Park, T. & Lee, Y.J. (2002). Covariance models for nested repeated measures data: Analysis of ovarian steroid secretion data. Stat Med, 21, 143-164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Galecki, A.J. (1994). General class of covariance structures for two or more repeated factors in longitudinal data analysis. Communications Stat, 23, 3105-3119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cambell, L. & Kashy, D.A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Pers Relatsh, 9, 327-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Eisenberger, N.I., Gable, S.L., & Lieberman, M.D. (2007). Functional magnetic resonance imaging responses relate to differences in real-world social experience. Emotion, 7, 745-754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a mediator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. J Pers Soc Psychol, 51, 505-514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Snyder, D.K., Castellani, A.M., & Whisman, M.A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annu Rev Psychol, 57, 317-344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was generously supported by grants R01 HL68862 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David M. Sanbonmatsu Ph.D. or Bert N. Uchino Ph.D..

Additional information

David M. Sanbonmatsu and Bert N. Uchino are co-first author.

About this article

Cite this article

Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Uchino, B.N. & Birmingham, W. On the Importance of Knowing Your Partner’s Views: Attitude Familiarity is Associated with Better Interpersonal Functioning and Lower Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Daily Life. ann. behav. med. 41, 131–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9234-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9234-0

Keywords

Navigation