Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral Frequency Moderates the Effects of Message Framing on HPV Vaccine Acceptability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Research suggests that gain-framed messages are generally more effective than loss-framed messages at promoting preventive health behaviors. Virtually all previous studies, however, have examined prevention behaviors that require regular and repeated action to be effective. Little is known about the utility of message framing for promoting low-frequency prevention behaviors such as vaccination. Moreover, few studies have identified mediators of framing effects.

Purpose

We investigated whether behavioral frequency (operationalized as the number of shots required) moderated the effect of framed health messages on women’s intentions to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. We also sought to identify mediators of framing effects.

Method

Undergraduate women (N = 237) were randomly assigned to read an HPV vaccination booklet that varied by message frame (gain vs. loss) and behavioral frequency (one shot vs. six shots).

Results

We observed a frame-by-frequency interaction such that the loss-framed message led to greater vaccination intentions than did the gain-framed message but only among participants in the one-shot condition. Perceived susceptibility to HPV infection mediated the observed framing effects.

Conclusions

This study provides an important exception to the commonly observed gain-framed advantage for preventive health behaviors. Loss-framed appeals appear to be particularly effective in promoting interest in low-frequency prevention behaviors such as HPV vaccination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothman AJ, Bartels RD, Wlaschin J, Salovey P. The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote health behavior: how theory can inform practice. J Commun. 2006; 56Suppl: S202–S220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abood DA, Coster DC, Mullis AK, Black DR. Evaluation of a “loss-framed” minimal intervention to increase mammography utilization among medically un- and under-insured women. Cancer Detec Prev. 2002; 26: 394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Apanovitch AM, McCarthy D, Salovey P. Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychol. 2003; 22: 60–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Detweiler JB, Bedell BT, Salovey P, Pronin E, Rothman AJ. Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 189–196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robberson MR, Rogers RW. Beyond fear appeals: negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1988; 13: 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider TR, Salovey P, Apanovitch AM, et al. The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychol. 2001; 20: 256–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, et al. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2007; 56: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979; 47: 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981; 211: 453–458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull. 1997; 121: 3–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiene SM, Barta WD, Zelenski JM, Cothran DL. Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages. Health Psychol. 2005; 24: 321–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lauver D, Rubin M. Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. Res Nurs Health. 1990; 13: 199–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lerman C, Ross E, Boyce A, et al. The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 729–730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott LB, Curbow B. The effect of message frames and CVD risk factors on behavioral outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2006; 30: 582–597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McCaul KD, Johnson RJ, Rothman AJ. The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychol. 2002; 21: 624–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothman AJ, Martino SC, Bedell BT, Detweiler JB, Salovey P. The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999; 11: 1355–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerend MA, Shepherd JE. Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 745–752.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mann T, Sherman D, Updegraff J. Dispositional motivations and message framing: a test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 330–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Millar MG, Millar KU. Promoting safe driving behaviors: the influences of message framing and issue involvement. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000; 30: 853–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rothman AJ, Salovey P, Antone C, Keough K, Martin CD. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1993; 29: 408–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bekker HL, Gough D, Williams M. Attendance choices about the influenza immunization programme: Evidence for targeting patients’ beliefs. Psychol Health Med. 2003; 8: 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith A, Yarwood J, Salisbury DM. Tracking mother’s attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996–2006. Vaccine. 2007; 25: 3996–4002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weinstein ND, Kwitel A, McCaul KD, et al. Risk perceptions: assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 146–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987; 52: 500–510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Educ Res. 1992; 7: 107–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15: 175–183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 136–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL, Herrington JE. Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals Behav Med. 2004; 27: 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moscicki AB. Impact of HPV infection in adolescent populations. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37Suppl. 1: S3–S9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baseman JG, Koutsky LA. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. J Clin Virol. 2005; 32Suppl. 1: S16–S24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bryan AD, Aiken LS, West SG. Young women’s condom use: the influence of acceptance of sexuality, control over the sexual encounter, and perceived susceptibility to common STDs. Health Psychol. 1997; 16: 468–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51: 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation modeling. In: Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological Methodology. Washington, DC, USA: American Sociological Association; 1982: 290–312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary A. Gerend Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Gerend, M.A., Shepherd, J.E. & Monday, K.A. Behavioral Frequency Moderates the Effects of Message Framing on HPV Vaccine Acceptability. ann. behav. med. 35, 221–229 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9024-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9024-0

Keywords

Navigation