Skip to main content
Log in

Associations of Perceived Community Environmental Attributes with Walking in a Population-Based Sample of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

No studies have yet examined the associations of physical environmental attributes specifically with walking in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine associations of perceived community physical environmental attributes with walking for transport and for recreation among adults living with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Participants were 771 adults with type 2 diabetes who completed a self-administered survey on perceived community physical environmental attributes and walking behaviors.

Results

Based on a criterion of a minimum of 120-min/week, some 29% were sufficiently active through walking for transport and 33% through walking for recreation. Significantly higher proportions of those actively walking for transport and for recreation had shops or places to buy things close by (67.8% and 60.9%); lived within a 15-min walk to a transit stop (70.6% and 71.0%); did not have dead-end streets close by (77.7% and 79.8%); reported interesting things to look at (84.8% and 84.4%); and lived close to low-cost recreation facilities (81.3% and 78.8%). In addition, those actively walking for transport reported living in a community with intersections close to each other (75.6%) and with sidewalks on their streets (88.1%). When these variables were entered simultaneously into logistic regression models, living close by to shops was positively related to walking for transport (OR = 1.92, 99% CI = 1.11–3.32).

Conclusions

Consistent with findings from studies of healthy adult populations, positive perceptions of community environmental attributes are associated with walking for transport among adults with type 2 diabetes. The now-strong public health case for environmental innovations to promote more walking for transport is further reinforced by the potential to benefit those living with diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health Canada. Responding to the Challenge of Diabetes in Canada: First Report of the National Diabetes Surveillance System. 2nd ed. Ottawa, ON: Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Population and Public Health Branch; 2002. Retrieved July 6, 2006 from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/dic-dac2/english/01cover_e.html.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2005. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 917–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health; 2003. Retrieved April 12, 2007 from www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/facts/obesity/en.

  5. Tjepkema M. Adult obesity. Health Reports. 2006; 17: 9–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. J Am Med Assoc. 2006; 295: 1549–1555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group. Physical activity in the prevention of type 2 diabetes: the Finnish diabetes prevention study. Diabetes. 2005; 54: 158–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Wasserman DH, Castaneda-Sceppa C, White RD. Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 1433–1438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ford ES, Herman WH. Leisure-time physical activity patterns in the U.S. diabetic population. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 27–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson KM, Reiber G, Boyko EJ. Diet and exercise among adults with type 2 diabetes: findings from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1722–1728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas N, Alder E, Leese GP. Barriers to physical activity in patients with diabetes. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2004; 80: 287–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Loreto C, Fanelli C, Lucidi P, et al. Make your diabetic patients walk: long-term impact of different amounts of physical activity on type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28: 1295–1302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregg EW, Gerzoff RB, Caspersen CJ, Williamson DF, Narayan KM. Relationship of walking to mortality among US adults with diabetes. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003; 163: 1440–1447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity in the management of diabetes: population-based perspectives and strategies. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2006; 30: 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu FB, Sigal RJ, Rich-Edwards JW, et al. Walking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in women: a prospective study. J Am Med Assoc. 1999; 282: 1433–1439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Solomon C, et al. Physical activity and risk for cardiovascular events in diabetic women. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134: 96–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamanouchi K, Shinozaki T, Chikada K, et al. Daily walking combined with diet therapy is a useful means for obese NIDDM patients not only to reduce body weight but also to improve insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 775–778.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sallis J, Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bassl; 2002: 462–484.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spence JC, Lee RE. Towards a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2003; 4: 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahn E, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22: 73–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heath GW, Brownson RC, Kruger J, et al. The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Activity and Health. 2006; 3Suppl.: 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frank LD, Engelke PO, Schmid TL. Health and Community Design: The Impact of the Built Environment on Physical Activity. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27: 67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fein A, Plotnikoff R, Wild C, Spence JC. An examination of adolescent’s perceptions of the school physical environment related to physical activity. Int J Sport Exercise Psychology. 2005; 3: 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC. Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28: 105–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirtland KA, Porter DE, Addy CL, et al. Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24: 323–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leslie E, Saelens B, Frank L, et al. Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. Health Place. 2005; 11: 227–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Org Behav Human Decis Process. 1991; 50: 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Duncan M, Spence J, Mummery WK. Perceived environment and physical activity: a meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005; 2: 11. Retrieved July 6, 2006 from http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/2/1/11#.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E, et al. Associations of location and perceived environmental attributes with walking in neighborhoods. Am J Health Promot. 2004; 18: 239–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals Behav Med. 2003; 25: 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. IPAQ Research Committee. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). IPAQ Research Committee, 2005. Retrieved June 6, 2006 from http://www.ipaq.ki.se/IPAQ%20LS%20Scoring%20Protocols_Nov05.pdf.

  34. Hays LM, Clark DO. Correlates of physical activity in a sample of older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 706–712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Deshpande AD, Baker EA, Lovegreen SL, Brownson RC. Environmental correlates of physical activity among individuals with diabetes in the rural Midwest. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28: 1012–1018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dutton GR, Johnson J, Whitehead D, Bodenlos JS, Brantley PJ. Barriers to physical activity among predominantly low-income African-American patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28: 1209–1210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Plotnikoff RC, Taylor LM, Wilson PM, et al. Factors associated with physical activity in Canadian adults with diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1526–1534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Statistics Canada. Census 2001–2B. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35: 1381–1395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Spittaels H, Brug J. Efficacy of sequential or simultaneous interactive computer-tailored interventions for increasing physical activity and decreasing fat intake. Annals Behav Med. 2005; 29: 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22: 188–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1552–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. International Physical Activity Prevalence Study Environmental survey Module. 2002. Retrieved July 6, 2006 from http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/sallis/IPAQIPS.pdf.

  44. Cerin E, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Neighborhood environment walkability scale: validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1682–1691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canada’s Physical Activity Guide to Healthy Active Living. Health Canada; 2003. Retrieved January 14, 2007 from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/pau-uap/paguide.

  46. Cox B, Cohen S. Methodological Issues for Health Care Surveys. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Spence J, Plotnikoff R, Rovniak L, et al. Perceived neighbourhood correlates of walking among participants visiting the Canada on the move website. Can J Public Health. 2006; 97Suppl.: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gregg EW, Beckles GL, Williamson DF, et al. Diabetes and physical disability among older U.S. adults. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1272–1277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams PT. Self-selection contributes significantly to the lower adiposity of faster, longer-distanced, male and female walkers. Int J Obes. 2007; 31: 652–662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) and Canadian Diabetes Association. Taylor is supported with a Studentship Award from AHFMR. Leslie is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia Public Health Fellowship #301261. Plotnikoff is supported by salary awards from AHFMR and Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Owen is supported by a Program Grant (#301200) from NHMRC of Australia and by a Research Infrastructure Grant from Queensland Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorian M. Taylor R.D., M.P.H..

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, L.M., Leslie, E., Plotnikoff, R.C. et al. Associations of Perceived Community Environmental Attributes with Walking in a Population-Based Sample of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. ann. behav. med. 35, 170–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9021-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9021-3

Keywords

Navigation