Logistics Research

, Volume 5, Issue 3–4, pp 105–111 | Cite as

On the configuration and planning of dynamic manufacturing networks

  • Nikolaos Papakostas
  • Konstantinos Efthymiou
  • Konstantinos Georgoulias
  • George Chryssolouris
Original Paper

Abstract

Manufacturing organizations have been attempting to improve the operation of supply networks through efficient supply chain management. Dynamic manufacturing networks (DMNs) constitute chains of diverse partners, whose operation and interaction may change in a rapid and often not predictable way. While the existing supply chain models are quite static and examine transportation modes, product changeover and production facility options with fixed suppliers and over a long period of time, the DMNs address operations and risks on a daily basis. In this paper, a novel decision-making approach is proposed for supporting the process of configuring a DMN from a holistic perspective, taking into account production, transportation and time constraints as well as multiple criteria such as time and cost.

Keywords

Supply chain management Scheduling Production planning Logistics Network design 

References

  1. 1.
    Chryssolouris G (2006) Manufacturing systems—theory and practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Permenter K, Anand S (2011) State of cross channel retail supply chain execution. Aberdeen Group, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chryssolouris G, Papakostas N, Mavrikios D (2008) A perspective on manufacturing strategy: produce more with less. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 1:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scholz-Reiter B, Morosini Frazzon E, Makuschewitz T (2010) Integrating manufacturing and logistic systems along global supply chains. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viswanadham N, Gaonkar RS (2003) Partners selection and synchronized planning in dynamic manufacturing networks. IEEE Transact Robot Autom 19:117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Speranza MG, Ukovich W (1994) Minimizing transportation and inventory costs for several products on a single link. Oper Res 42:879–894MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Theattre K, Graves S (2001) Tactical shipping and scheduling at Polaroid with dual lead-times. In: Innovation in manufacturing systems and technology (IMST) report, http://web.mit.edu/sgraves/www/SMA%20paper%20Oct%2001.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2012
  8. 8.
    Seifert RW, Langenberg KU (2011) Managing business dynamics with adaptive supply chain portfolios. Eur J Oper Res 215:551–562MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vidal CJ, Goetschalckx M (2001) A global supply chain model with transfer pricing and transportation cost allocation. Eur J Oper Res 129:134–158MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klincewicz JG, Luss H, Yu CS (1988) A large-scale multilocation capacity planning model. Eur J Oper Res 34:178–190MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stadtler H (2009) A framework for collaborative planning and state-of-the-art. OR Spectrum 31:5–30MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhatnagar R, Chandra P, Goyal SK (2004) Models for multi-plant coordination. Eur J Oper Res 67:141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pibernik R, Sucky R (2007) An approach to inter domain master planning in supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 108:200–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dudek G, Stadtler H (2005) Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chain partners. Eur J Oper Res 163:668–687MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaos Papakostas
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Efthymiou
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Georgoulias
    • 1
  • George Chryssolouris
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering and AeronauticsUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations