Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Nitrogen Fertilization and Harvest Management of Switchgrass: Impacts on Biomass Yield and Nitrogen Removal

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This article has been updated

Abstract

Perennial energy grasses, such as switchgrass, represent a potentially important component of sustainable bioenergy production. However, both economic and environmental sustainability will depend on reducing fossil fuel inputs for production to their bare minimum levels. The purpose of this study was to identify the impacts of nitrogen fertilization and harvest management on biomass production and nitrogen removal of two switchgrass cultivars. Five rates of nitrogen addition were evaluated across four developmental growth stages at two field sites for up to 5 years. The sites differed in biomass yield and nitrogen removal rates, with one site responding strongly to nitrogen addition and the other site showing weak and inconsistent responses. Biomass yield was generally reduced by delaying harvest until after senescence, but the yield reduction was small compared to the relatively large reductions in nitrogen removal rates. Following senescence, nitrogen removal rates never exceeded 50 kg N ha−1 and were generally below 30 kg N ha−1, averaged over years. Because these values are below estimates of potential associative nitrogen fixation for switchgrass on silt loam soils, this research suggests that nitrogen fertilization may not be a long-term sustainable practice for soils such as those utilized in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Data and materials are available only by contacting the author.

Change history

  • 02 April 2022

    The original version of this paper was updated to update the first affiliation

References

  1. Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Boateng AA, Weimer PJ, Jung HG (2006) Biomass yield and biofuel quality of switchgrass harvested in fall or spring. Agron J 98:1518–1525. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson EA, Parrish AS, Voigt TB, Owens VN, Hong CH, Lee DK (2013) Nitrogen fertility and harvest management of switchgrass for sustainable bioenergy feedstock production in Illinois. Ind Crops Prod 48:19–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Association of Official Seed Analysts (1998) Rules of testing seeds. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Lincoln, NE

  4. Burke RH, Moore KJ, Shipitalo MJ, Miguez FE, Heaton EA (2017) All washed out? Foliar nutrient resorption and leaching in senescing switchgrass. BioEnergy Res 10:305–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Casler MD, Boe AR (2003) Cultivar × environment interactions in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:2226–2233. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Casler MD, Mitchell RB, Vogel KP (2012) Switchgrass. In: Kole C et al (eds) Handbook of bioenergy crop plants, vol 2. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 563–590

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Casler MD, Vogel KP, Lee DK, Mitchell RB, Adler PR, Sulc RM, Johnson KD, Kallenbach RL, Boe AR, Mathison RD, Cassida KA, Min DH, Crawford J, Moore KJ (2018) 30 Years of progress toward increasing biomass yield of switchgrass and big bluestem. Crop Sci 58:1242–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen H, Dai Z, Jager HI, Wullschleger SD, Xu J, Schadt CW (2019) Influences of nitrogen fertilization and climate regime on the above-ground T biomass yields of miscanthus and switchgrass: A meta-analysis. Renew Sust Energy Rev 108:303–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorlitsky LE, Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, Etemadi F, Herbert SJ (2015) Biomass vs. quality tradeoffs for switchgrass in response to fall harvesting period. Ind Crops Prod 63:311–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hestrin R, Lee MR, Whitaker BK, Pett-Ridge J (2021) The switchgrass microbiome: a review of structure, function, and taxonomic distribution. Phytobiomes J 5:14–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong CO, Owens VN, Bransby D, Farris R, Fike J, Heaton E, Kim S, Mayton H, Mitchell R, Viands D (2014) Switchgrass response to nitrogen fertilizer across diverse environments in the USA: a regional feedstock partnership report. BioEnergy Res 7:777–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9484-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jach-Smith LC, Jackson RD (2018) N addition undermines N supplied by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to native perennial grasses. Soil Biol Biochem 116:148–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jach-Smith LC, Jackson RD (2020) Inorganic N addition replaces N supplied to switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol Appl https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2047

  14. Jackson RD (2020) Soil nitrate leaching under grazed cool-season grass pastures of the North Central US. J Sci Food Agric 100:5307–5312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung JY, Lal R (2011) Impacts of nitrogen fertilization on biomass production of switchgrass (Panicum Virgatum L.) and changes in soil organic carbon in Ohio. Geoderma 166:145–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ker K, Seguin P, Driscoll BT, Fyles JW, Smith DL (2012) Switchgrass establishment and seeding year production can be improved by inoculation with rhizosphere endophytes. Biomass Bioenergy 47:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee DK, Doolittle JJ, Owens VN (2007) Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in established switchgrass land managed for biomass production. Soil Biol Biochem 39:178e86

  18. Lemus R, Parrish DJ, Abaye O (2008) Nitrogen-use dynamics in switchgrass grown for biomass. BioEnergy Res 1:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9014-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lowman S, Kim-Dura S, Mei C, Nowak J (2016) Strategies for enhancement of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) performance under limited nitrogen supply based on utilization of N-fixing bacterial endophytes. Plant Soil 405:47–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Makaju SO, Wu YQ, Zhang H, Kakani VG, Taliaferro CM, Anderson MP (2013) Switchgrass winter yield, year-round elemental concentrations, and associated soil nutrients in a zero input environment. Agron J 105:463–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA (2005) Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 28(6):515–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nikièma P, Rothstein DE, Min DH, Kapp CJ (2011) Nitrogen fertilization of switchgrass increases biomass yield and improves net greenhouse gas balance in northern Michigan, U.S.A. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4356–4367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Owens VN, Viands DR, Mayton HS, Fike JR, Farris R, Heaton E, Bransby DI, Hong CO (2013) Nitrogen use in switchgrass grown for bioenergy across the USA. Biomass Bioenergy 58:286–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Parrish DJ, Fike JH (2005) The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:423–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Perrin R, Vogel KP, Schmer MR, Mitchell RB (2008) Farm-scale production cost of switchgrass for biomass. BioEnergy Res 1:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roley SS, Duncan DS, Liang D, Garoutte A, Jackson RD, Tiedje JM, Robertson GP (2018) Associative nitrogen fixation (ANF) in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) across a nitrogen input gradient. PLOS One 13:e0197320

  28. Roley SS, Xue C, Hamilton SK, Tiedje JM, Robertson GP (2019) Isotopic evidence for episodic nitrogen fixation in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Soil Biol Biochem 129:90–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadeghpour A, Gorlitsky LE, Hashemi M, Weis SA, Herbert SJ (2014) Response of switchgrass yield and quality to harvest season and nitrogen fertilizer. Agron J 106:290–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanderson MA, Adler PR, Boateng AA, Casler MD, Sarath G (2007) Switchgrass as a biofuels feedstock in the USA. Can J Plant Sci 86:1315–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarkar S, Miller SA, Frederick JR, Chamberlain JF (2011) Modeling nitrogen loss from switchgrass agricultural systems. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4381–4389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmer MR, Liebig MR, Hendrickson JR, Tanaka DL, Phillips RL (2012) Growing season greenhouse gas flux from switchgrass in the northern great plains. Biomass Bioenergy 45:315–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Serapiglia MJ, Boateng AA, Lee DK, Casler MD (2016) Switchgrass harvest time management can impact biomass yield and nutrient content. Crop Sci 56:1970–1980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shenk JS, Westerhaus MO (1991) Population definition, sample selection, and calibration procedures for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Sci 31:469–474. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100020049x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smercina DN, Evans SE, Friesen ML, Tieman LK (2019) To fix or not to fix: controls on free-living nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e02546-e2618. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02546-18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA (1997) Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vogel KP, Brejda JJ, Walters DT, Buxton DR (2002) Switchgrass biomass production in the midwest USA. Agron J 94:413–420. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vogel KP, Dien BS, Jung HG, Casler MD, Masterson SD, Mitchell RB (2011) Quantifying actual and theoretical ethanol yields for switchgrass strains using NIRS analyses. BioEnergy Res 4:96–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-010-9104-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wewalwela JJ, Tian Y, Donaldson JR, Baldwin BS, Varco JJ, Rushing B, Lu H, Williams MA (2020) Associative nitrogen fixation linked with three perennial bioenergy grasses in field and greenhouse experiments. GCB Bioenergy 12:1104–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson DM, Dalluge DL, Rover M, Heaton EA, Brown RC (2013) Crop management impacts biofuel quality: influence of switchgrass harvest time on yield, nitrogen and ash of fast pyrolysis products. BioEnergy Res 6:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9240-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wullschleger SD, Davis EB, Borsuk ME, Gunderson CA, Lynd LR (2010) Biomass production in switchgrass across the United States: database description and determinants of yield. Agron J 102:1158–1168. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang J, Udvardi M (2018) Senescence and nitrogen use efficiency in perennial grasses for forage and biofuel production. J Exp Bot 69:855–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nick Baker, Tony Johnson, Joe Halinar, Jacob Karlen, and Jim Richmond (USDA-ARS) for technical assistance and expertise throughout the course of this study. We also thank Michael Bertram and Jason Cavadini, University of Wisconsin Agricultural Research Stations, for assistance and support of field operations.

Funding

This research was funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive grant #2011–68005-30411 (CenUSA), awarded to the U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michael D. Casler

    Present address: Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA-ARS, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, 1925 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706-1108, USA

    Michael D. Casler

Authors
  1. Michael D. Casler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MDC conducted the field research, collected all data, conducted all statistical analyses, and wrote the entire manuscript, with technical assistance as described above.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Casler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

There are no ethical issues associated with this manuscript.

Consent for Publication

The author has the approval to publish from both the USDA and the University of Wisconsin.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 320 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casler, M.D. Nitrogen Fertilization and Harvest Management of Switchgrass: Impacts on Biomass Yield and Nitrogen Removal. Bioenerg. Res. 16, 369–378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10435-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10435-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation