Abstract
Biomass (especially algae) is a renewable energy source that can be a great alternative to fossil fuels. Wet algal biomass converts into products such as solid, aqueous, and gaseous phases as well as biocrude in hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). The aim of this work was to provide detailed exergy analyses of the production of biocrude from Nannochloropsis sp. by HTL. Physical and chemical exergy of the HTL products, exergy losses, exergy efficiency, and exergy distribution of the HTL process were determined in this research. The highest exergy loss and the lowest efficiency values obtained for the heat exchanger were 65,856.83 MJ/hr and 66.64%, respectively, which was mainly caused by the irreversibility of the heat transfer process. Moreover, the HTL reactor had high efficiency (99.9%) due to the complex reactions that occurred at high temperature and pressure. Also, the optimum operating conditions of the reactor were obtained at 350 °C and 20 MPa by using sensitivity analysis. The high overall exergy efficiency of the process (94.93%) indicated that HTL was the most effective process for the conversion of algae. In addition, the exergy recovery values of the overall exergy input values in the HTL process for biocrude, as well as the aqueous, solid, and gas phases, were nearly 74.88%, 18.42%, 0.86%, and 0.76%, respectively. Exergy assessment provides beneficial information for improving the thermodynamic performance of the HTL system.
Data Availability
The data are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Abbreviations
- %AAD:
-
Percent of average absolute deviation
- AQU:
-
Aqueous phase
- Ex:
-
Exergy rate (kJ/hr)
- ex:
-
Molar exergy (kJ/mol)
- g:
-
Gibbs energy (kJ/mol)
- H:
-
Enthalpy (kJ/hr)
- HEX:
-
Heat exchanger
- HTL:
-
Hydrothermal liquefaction
- HTR-R:
-
HTL reactor
- LHV:
-
Lower heating value (MJ/kg)
- n:
-
Mole flow rate (mol/hr)
- m:
-
Mass flow rate (kg/hr)
- P:
-
Pump
- R:
-
Gas constant (kJ/mol. K)
- S:
-
Entropy (kJ/hr k)
- S-Sep.:
-
Solid separator
- T:
-
Temperature (K)
- V:
-
Valve
- W:
-
Work rate (kJ/hr)
- x:
-
Mole fraction (-)
- 3-Sep.:
-
Three-phase separator
- β:
-
Exergy coefficient (-)
- ɳ:
-
Exergy efficiency (-)
- v:
-
Stoichiometric coefficient
- ph:
-
Physical
- 0:
-
Standard state
- Chem:
-
Chemical
- f:
-
Formation
- In:
-
Input
- i, j:
-
Numerator
- Loss:
-
Loss of exergy
- Output:
-
Output
- Q:
-
Heat transfer
- 0:
-
Reference state
References
Sudasinghe N, Dungan B, Lammers P et al (2014) High resolution FT-ICR mass spectral analysis of bio-oil and residual water soluble organics produced by hydrothermal liquefaction of the marine microalga Nannochloropsis salina. Fuel 119:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.019
Jin M, Oh YK, Chang YK, Choi M (2017) Optimum utilization of biochemical components in Chlorella sp. KR1 via subcritical hydrothermal liquefaction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(8):7240–7248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01473
Changi SM, Faeth JL, Mo N, Savage PE (2015) Hydrothermal reactions of biomolecules relevant for microalgae liquefaction. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(47):11733–11758. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02771
Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(2):578–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003
Mahmood R, Parshetti GK, Balasubramanian R (2016) Energy, exergy and techno-economic analyses of hydrothermal oxidation of food waste to produce hydro-char and bio-oil. Energy 102:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.042
Rincon B, Altamar M, Castilla E et al (2018) Evaluation of hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlorella sp. for biocrude production using computer-aided exergy analysis. Contemp Eng Sci 11:1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2018.7993
Moreno-Sader K, Meramo-Hurtado SI, González-Delgado AD (2019) Computer-aided environmental and exergy analysis as decision-making tools for selecting bio-oil feedstocks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 112:42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.044
Zhong C, Peters CJ, de Swaan AJ (2002) Thermodynamic modeling of biomass conversion processes. Fluid Ph Equilibria 194:805–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00668-9
Beal CM, Hebner RE, Webber ME (2012) Thermodynamic analysis of algal biocrude production. Energy 44(1):925–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.003
Keedy J, Prymak E, Macken N et al (2015) Exergy based assessment of the production and conversion of switchgrass, equine waste, and forest residue to bio-oil using fast pyrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(1):529–539. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5035682
Peters JF, Petrakopoulou F, Dufour J (2014) Exergetic analysis of a fast pyrolysis process for bio-oil production. Fuel Process Technol 119:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.11.007
Peters JF, Petrakopoulou F, Dufour J (2015) Exergy analysis of synthetic biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading. Energy 79:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.019
Meramo-Hurtado S, Ojeda-Delgado K, Sanchez-Tuiran E (2018) Exergy analysis of bioethanol production from rice residues. Contemp Eng Sci 11:467–474. https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2018.8234
Xiao C, Liao Q, Fu Q et al (2019) Exergy analyses of biogas production from microalgae biomass via anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 289:121709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121709
Khounani Z, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H, Nazemi F et al (2021) Exergy analysis of a whole-crop safflower biorefinery: a step towards reducing agricultural wastes in a sustainable manner. J Environ Manage 279:111822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111822
Prasakti L, Pratama SH, Fauzi A et al (2020) Exergy analysis of conventional and hydrothermal liquefaction-esterification processes of microalgae for biodiesel production. Open Chem 18(1):874–881. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0132
Torres E, Rodriguez-Ortiz LA, Zalazar D et al (2020) 4-E (environmental, economic, energetic and exergetic) analysis of slow pyrolysis of lignocellulosic waste. Renew Energy 162:296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.147
Tamzysi C, Adnan MA, Rahma FN, Hidayat A (2020) Exergy analysis of microalgae thermochemical conversion using Aspen Plus simulation. Reaktor 20(4):166–173. https://doi.org/10.14710/reaktor.20.4.166-173
Aghbashlo M, Mandegari M, Tabatabaei M et al (2018) Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production. Energy 149:623–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.063
Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, Hosseinpour S (2018) On the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation and optimization of biodiesel synthesis from waste cooking oil (WCO) using a low power, high frequency ultrasonic reactor. Energy Convers Manag 164:385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.086
Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, Soltanian S et al (2019) Comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a municipal solid waste digestion plant equipped with a biogas genset. Waste Manag 87:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.029
Jones S, Zhu Y, Anderson D et al (2014) Process design and economics for the conversion of algal biomass to hydrocarbons: whole algae hydrothermal liquefaction and upgrading. Pacific Northwest National Lab, PNNL-23227, Richland, United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1126336
Toor SS, Rosendahl L, Rudolf A (2011) Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a review of subcritical water technologies. Energy 36(5):2328–2342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.013
Darmawan A, Hardi F, Yoshikawa K et al (2017) Enhanced process integration of entrained flow gasification and combined cycle: modeling and simulation using Aspen Plus. Energy Procedia 105:303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.318
Duan PG, Yang SK, Xu YP et al (2018) Integration of hydrothermal liquefaction and supercritical water gasification for improvement of energy recovery from algal biomass. Energy 155:734–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.044
Ranganathan P, Savithri S (2019) Techno-economic analysis of microalgae-based liquid fuels production from wastewater via hydrothermal liquefaction and hydroprocessing. Bioresour Technol 284:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.087
Ramirez JA, Brown R, Rainey TJ (2018) Techno-economic analysis of the thermal liquefaction of sugarcane bagasse in ethanol to produce liquid fuels. Appl Energy 224:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.127
Hou D, Shao S, Zhang Y et al (2012) Exergy analysis of a thermal power plant using a modeling approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(5):805–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-011-0447-0
Hepbasli A (2008) A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(3):593–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.001
Kotas TJ (1985) Exergy method of thermal and chemical plant analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-00894-8
Mabrouk A, Erdocia X, Alriols MG et al (2016) Exergy analysis: an optimization tool for the performance evaluation of an organosolv process. Appl Therm Eng 106:1062–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.085
Xiong J, Zhao H, Zheng C (2011) Exergy analysis of a 600 MWe oxy-combustion pulverized-coal- fired power plant. Energy Fuels 25(8):3854–3864. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200702k
Olaleye AK, Wang M, Kelsall G (2015) Steady state simulation and exergy analysis of supercritical coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture. Fuel 151:57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.013
Feyzi V, Beheshti M (2017) Exergy analysis and optimization of reactive distillation column in acetic acid production process. Chem Eng Process 120:161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.06.016
Song G, Shen L, Xiao J (2011) Estimating specific chemical exergy of biomass from basic analysis data. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(16):9758–9766. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200534n
Bilgen S, Keleş S, Kaygusuz K (2012) Calculation of higher and lower heating values and chemical exergy values of liquid products obtained from pyrolysis of hazelnut cupulae. Energy 41(1):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.001
Szargut J (2011) Appendix: standard chemical exergy. In: Bakshi BR, Gutowski TG, Sekulić DP (eds) Thermodynamics and the destruction of resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976049.024
Qian H, Zhu W, Fan S et al (2017) Prediction models for chemical exergy of biomass on dry basis from ultimate analysis using available electron concepts. Energy 131:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.037
Morris DR, Szargut J (1986) Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth. Energy 11(8):733–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(86)90013-7
Van NT, Voldsund M, Elmegaard B et al (2014) On the definition of exergy efficiencies for petroleum systems: application to offshore oil and gas processing. Energy 73:264–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.020
Wall G (2003) Exergy tools. Proc Inst Mech Eng A 217(2):125–136. https://doi.org/10.1243/09576500360611399
Hognon C, Delrue F, Texier J et al (2015) Comparison of pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Growth studies on the recovered hydrothermal aqueous phase. Biomass Bioenergy 73:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.11.025
Durak H (2019) Characterization of products obtained from hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass (Anchusa azurea) compared to other thermochemical conversion methods. Biomass Convers Biorefin 9(2):459–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00379-4
Xue X, Chen D, Song X, Dai X (2015) Hydrothermal and pyrolysis treatment for sewage sludge: choice from product and from energy benefit. Energy Procedia 66:301–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.02.064
Zhang B, Wu J, Deng Z et al (2017) A comparison of energy consumption in hydrothermal liquefaction and pyrolysis of microalgae. Trends Ren Energy 3(1):76–85. https://doi.org/10.17737/tre.2017.3.1.0013
Ramirez JA, Rainey TJ (2019) Comparative techno-economic analysis of biofuel production through gasification, thermal liquefaction and pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. J Clean Prod 229:513–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.017
Brown TM, Duan P, Savage PE (2010) Hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification of Nannochloropsis sp. Energy Fuels 24(6):3639–3646. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef100203u
Valdez PJ, Savage PE (2013) A reaction network for the hydrothermal liquefaction of Nannochloropsis sp. Algal Res 2(4):416–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2013.08.002
Faeth JL, Valdez PJ, Savage PE (2013) Fast hydrothermal liquefaction of Nannochloropsis sp. to produce biocrude. Energy Fuels 27(3):1391–1398. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301925d
Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, Mohammadi P et al (2017) Neat diesel beats waste-oriented biodiesel from the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental point of views. Energy Convers Manag 148:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.048
Aghbashlo M, Rosen MA (2018) Exergoeconoenvironmental analysis as a new concept for developing thermodynamically, economically, and environmentally sound energy conversion systems. J Clean Prod 187:190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ziba Borazjani: developing the concept and methodology, analyzing the data, writing the original draft, as well as reviewing and editing the final manuscript. Reza Azin: trial management, data acquisition, and reviewing the manuscript. Shahriar Osfouri: management, conceptualization, and acquisition of material used in the study, project initiation, reviewing, and editing. Markus Lehner: reviewing and editing the manuscript. Markus Ellersdorfer: reviewing, model validation, and editing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
All authors agree with the content and all give explicit consent to submit the paper.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borazjani, Z., Azin, R., Osfouri, S. et al. Computer-Aided Exergy Evaluation of Hydrothermal Liquefaction for Biocrude Production from Nannochloropsis sp.. Bioenerg. Res. 15, 141–153 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10297-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10297-x