Agronomic Evaluation of Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) Cultivars for Biodiesel Feedstock
- 308 Downloads
Recent interest in renewable energy sources and the need to diversify cropping systems have triggered research interest in camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz). Camelina is well adapted to the temperate dryland climates and can be used as an energy crop. But information on agronomic evaluation of camelina cultivars for biodiesel feedstock are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate six spring camelina cultivars (cv. Blaine Creek, Calena, Ligena, Pronghorn, Shoshone, and Suneson) on seed yield, oil concentration, and oil yield. The study was carried out from 2013 to 2015 at three locations (Havre, Moccasin, and Pendroy, MT). Over locations and years, mean seed yield differences among cultivars were significant (P < 0.05). The mean seed yield for cultivars ranging from 1295 kg ha−1 (Suneson) to 1420 kg ha−1 (Ligena). Ligena and Calena showed a combination of good seed yield performance and stability across environments. Environmental means for seed yield differences were substantial compared with cultivar means. The location Havre produced 45 and 32% more mean seed yield than Pendroy and Moccasin, respectively. There was no significant difference among cultivars in oil concentration and oil yield. The absence of variations in oil concentration and oil yield differences among these cultivars could indicate the need for further research to improve these qualities essential for biodiesel.
KeywordsBiodiesel Biofuel Camelina Oil yield Stability
The source of funding for this experiment was the USDA-BRDI Program (Grant#2012-10006-20230).
- 3.Robinson R (1987) Camelina: a useful research crop and a potential oilseed crop. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
- 5.USDA (2010) A USDA regional roadmap to meeting the biofuels goals of the renewable fuels standard by 2022. USDA Biofuels Strategic Production Report, USA. USAGoogle Scholar
- 12.Jackson GD (2008) Response of camelina to nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur. Fertilizer Facts: Number 49. vol 49. Montana State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wysocki D, Sirovatka N (2008) Camelina, a potential oilseed crop for semiarid Oregon. 2008 Dryland Agricultural Research Annual Report. Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station and USDA ARSGoogle Scholar
- 18.NASS (2013) Camelina acreage, yield and production, Montana, USA. National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.nass.usda.gov/statistics_by_state/Montana. Accessed May 31 2016
- 19.Mohammed YA, Chen C, Jensen T (2015) Urease and nitrification inhibitors impact on winter wheat fertilizer timing, yield, and protein content. Agron J. doi: 10.2134/agronj2015.0391
- 20.Levene H (1960) Robust tests for the quality of variance. Contribution to probability and statistics. Stanford Uni.Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- 21.SAS (2001) SAS/STAT guide. SAS Inst. Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
- 22.Pacheo A, Vargas M, Alvarado G, Rodriguez F, Lopez M, Crossa J, Burgueno J (2015) GEA-R (Genotype x environment analysis with R for windows) Version 2.0. 2.0 edn. International Maize and Wheat Improvment Center.,Google Scholar
- 24.Mohammed YA, Raun W, Kakani G, Zhang H, Taylor R, Desta KG, Jared C, Mullock J, Bushong J, Sutradhar A, Ali MS, Reinert M (2015) Nutrient sources and harvesting frequency on quality biomass production of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for biofuel. Biomass Bioenergy 81:242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar