BioEnergy Research

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 1087–1100 | Cite as

Time Course Field Analysis of COMT-Downregulated Switchgrass: Lignification, Recalcitrance, and Rust Susceptibility

  • Holly L. Baxter
  • Mitra Mazarei
  • Chunxiang Fu
  • Qunkang Cheng
  • Geoffrey B. Turner
  • Robert W. Sykes
  • Mark T. Windham
  • Mark F. Davis
  • Richard A. Dixon
  • Zeng-Yu Wang
  • C. Neal StewartJr.
Article

Abstract

Modifying plant cell walls by manipulating lignin biosynthesis can improve biofuel yields from lignocellulosic crops. For example, transgenic switchgrass lines with downregulated expression of caffeic acid O-methyltransferase, a lignin biosynthetic enzyme, produce up to 38 % more ethanol than controls. The aim of the present study was to understand cell wall lignification over the second and third growing seasons of COMT-downregulated field-grown switchgrass. COMT gene expression, lignification, and cell wall recalcitrance were assayed for two independent transgenic lines at monthly intervals. Switchgrass rust (Puccinia emaculata) incidence was also tracked across the seasons. Trends in lignification over time differed between the 2 years. In 2012, sampling was initiated in mid-growing season on reproductive-stage plants and there was little variation in the lignin content of all lines (COMT-downregulated and control) over time. COMT-downregulated lines maintained 11–16 % less lignin, 33–40 % lower S/G (syringyl-to-guaiacyl) ratios, and 15–42 % higher sugar release relative to controls for all time points. In 2013, sampling was initiated earlier in the season on elongation-stage plants and the lignin content of all lines steadily increased over time, while sugar release expectedly decreased. S/G ratios increased in non-transgenic control plants as biomass accumulated over the season, while remaining relatively stable across the season in the COMT-downregulated lines. Differences in cell wall chemistry between transgenic and non-transgenic lines were not apparent until plants transitioned to reproductive growth in mid-season, after which the cell walls of COMT-downregulated plants exhibited phenotypes consistent with what was observed in 2012. There were no differences in rust damage between transgenics and controls at any time point. These results provide relevant fundamental insights into the process of lignification in a maturing field-grown biofuel feedstock with downregulated lignin biosynthesis.

Keywords

Biomass Caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) Lignin Lignocellulosic biofuel Switchgrass 

Supplementary material

12155_2016_9751_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.8 mb)
ESM 1(DOCX 3927 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Carroll A, Somerville C (2009) Cellulosic biofuels. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:165–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP (2010) Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science 329:790–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitchell R, Vogel KP, Sarath G (2008) Managing and enhancing switchgrass as a bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2(6):530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarath G, Dien B, Saathoff AJ, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Chen H (2011) Ethanol yields and cell wall properties in divergently bred switchgrass genotypes. Bioresour Technol 102:9579–9585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fu C, Mielenz JR, Xiao X, Ge Y, Hamilton CY, Rodriguez M Jr, Chen F, Foston M, Ragauskas A, Bouton J, Dixon RA, Wang ZY (2011) Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(9):3803–3808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen H, He X, Poovaiah CR, Wuddineh WA, Ma J, Mann DG, Wang H, Jackson L, Tang Y, Stewart CN Jr, Chen F, Dixon RA (2012) Functional characterization of the switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) R2R3-MYB transcription factor PvMYB4 for improvement of lignocellulosic feedstocks. New Phytol 193(1):121–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shen H, Poovaiah CR, Ziebell A, Tschaplinski TJ, Pattathil S, Gjersing E, Engle NL, Katahira R, Pu Y, Sykes R, Chen F, Ragauskas AJ, Mielenz JR, Hahn MG, Davis M, Stewart CN Jr, Dixon RA (2013) Enhanced characteristics of genetically modified switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for high biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(1):71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu B, Escamilla-Treviño LL, Sathitsuksanoh N, Shen Z, Shen H, Percival Zhang Y-H, Dixon RA, Zhao B (2011) Silencing of 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase in switchgrass leads to reduced lignin content and improved fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. New Phytol 192(3):611–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saathoff AJ, Sarath G, Chow EK, Dien BS, Tobias CM (2011) Downregulation of cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase in switchgrass by RNA silencing results in enhanced glucose release after cellulase treatment. PLoS One 6(1):e16416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pauly M, Keegstra K (2008) Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J 54:559–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moura JCMS, Bonine CAV, De Oliveira Fernandes Viana J, Dornelas MC, Mazzafera P (2010) Abiotic and biotic stresses and changes in the lignin content and composition in plants. J Integr Plant Biol 52(4):360–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miedes E, Vanholme R, Boerjan W, Molina A (2014) The role of the secondary cell wall in plant resistance to pathogens. Front Plant Sci 5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeMartini JD, Pattathil S, Miller JS, Li H, Hahn MG, Wyman CE (2013) Investigating plant cell wall components that affect biomass recalcitrance in poplar and switchgrass. Energy Environ Sci 6:898–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin DB (2011) Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 29:675–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:3713–3729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poovaiah CR, Nageswara-Rao M, Soneji JR, Baxter HL, Stewart CN Jr (2014) Altered lignin biosynthesis using biotechnology to improve lignocellulosic biofuel feedstocks. Plant Biotechnol J 12:1163–1173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang P, Dudareva N, Morgan JA, Chapple C (2015) Genetic manipulation of lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy. Curr Opin Chem Biol 29:32–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moore KJ, Jung HJG (2001) Lignin and fiber digestion. J Range Manag:420–430Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shen H, Fu C, Xiao X, Ray T, Tang Y, Wang Z, Chen F (2009) Developmental control of lignification in stems of lowland switchgrass variety Alamo and the effects on saccharification efficiency. BioEnergy Res 2:233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hardin CF, Fu C, Hisano H, Xiao X, Shen H, Stewart CN Jr, Parrott W, Dixon RA, Wang ZY (2013) Standardization of switchgrass sample collection for cell wall and biomass trait analysis. BioEnergy Res 6:755–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grabber JH (2005) How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies. Crop Sci 45:820–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacAdam JW, Grabber JH (2002) Relationship of growth cessation with the formation of diferulate cross-links and p-coumaroylated lignins in tall fescue leaf blades. Planta 215:785–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jung HJG (2003) Maize stem tissues: ferulate deposition in developing internode cell walls. Phytochemistry 63:543–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen L, Auh C, Chen F, Cheng XF, Aljoe H, Dixon RA, Wang ZY (2002) Lignin deposition and associated changes in anatomy, enzyme activity, gene expression, and ruminal degradability in stems of tall fescue at different developmental stages. J Agric Food Chem 50:5558–5565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jung HJ, Casler MD (2006) Maize stem tissues: cell wall concentration and composition during development. Crop Sci 46:1793–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dien BS, Jung HJG, Vogel KP, Casler MD, Lamb JF, Iten L, Mitchell RB, Sarath G (2006) Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 30:880–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baxter HL, Mazarei M, Labbe N, Kline LM, Cheng Q, Windham MT, Mann DGJ, Chunxiang F, Ziebell A, Sykes RW, Rodriguez M Jr, Davis MF, Mielenz JR, Dixon RA, Wang Z-Y, Stewart CN Jr (2014) Two-year field analysis of reduced recalcitrance transgenic switchgrass. Plant Biotechnol J 12(7):914–924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moore KJ, Moser LE, Vogel KP, Waller SS, Johnson BE, Pedersen JF (1991) Describing and quantifying growth stages of perennial forage grasses. Agron J 83:1073–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sykes R, Yung M, Novaes E, Kirst M, Peter G, Davis M (2009) High-throughput screening of plant cell-wall composition using pyrolysis molecular beam mass spectroscopy. In: Mielenz J (ed) Biofuels: methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, New York, pp 169–183Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Decker SR, Carlile M, Selig MJ, Doeppke C, Davis M, Sykes R, Turner G, Ziebell A (2012) Reducing the effect of variable starch levels in biomass recalcitrance screening. In: Himmel M (ed) Biomass conversion: methods and protocols. Springer, New York, pp. 181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Selig MJ, Tucker MP, Sykes RW, Reichel KL, Brunecky R, Himmel ME, Davis MF, Decker SF (2010) Biomass recalcitrance screening by integrated high throughput hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification. Ind Biotechnol 6:104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Humphreys JM, Hemm MR, Chapple C (1999) New routes for lignin biosynthesis defined by biochemical characterization of recombinant ferulate 5-hydroxylase, a multifunctional cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:10045–10050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Louie GV, Bowman ME, Tu Y, Mouradov A, Spangenberg G, Noel JP (2010) Structure-function analyses of a caffeic acid O-methyltransferase from perennial ryegrass reveal the molecular basis for substrate preference. Plant Cell 22:4114–4127CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Osakabe K, Tsao CC, Li L, Popko JL, Umezawa T, Carraway DT, Smeltzer RH, Joshi CP, Chiang VL (1999) Coniferyl aldehyde 5-hydroxylation and methylation direct syringyl lignin biosynthesis in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:8955–8960CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guo D, Chen F, Inoue K, Blount JW, Dixon RA (2001) Downregulation of caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase and caffeoyl CoA 3-O-methyltransferase in transgenic alfalfa: impacts on lignin structure and implications for the biosynthesis of G and S lignin. Plant Cell 13:73–88CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Palmer NA, Sattler SE, Saathoff AJ, Funnell D, Pedersen JF, Sarath G (2008) Genetic background impacts soluble and cell wall-bound aromatics in brown midrib mutants of sorghum. Planta 229:115–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vignols F, Rigau J, Torres MA, Capellades M, Puigdomènech P (1995) The brown midrib3 (bm3) mutation in maize occurs in the gene encoding caffeic acid O-methyltransferase. Plant Cell 7:407–416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bhuiyan NH, Selvaraj G, Wei Y, King J (2009) Gene expression profiling and silencing reveal that monolignol biosynthesis plays a critical role in penetration defence in wheat against powdery mildew invasion. J Exp Bot 60:509–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Le Gall H, Philippe F, Domon JM, Gillet F, Pelloux J, Rayon C (2015) Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants 4:112–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2013) Can genetic engineering of lignin deposition be accomplished without an unacceptable yield penalty? Curr Opin Biotechnol 24:336–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baxter HL, Poovaiah CR, Yee KL, Mazarei M, Rodriguez M Jr, Thompson OA, Shen H, Turner GB, Decker SR, Sykes RW, Chen F, Davis MF, Mielenz JR, Davison BH, Dixon RA, Stewart CN Jr (2015) Field evaluation of transgenic switchgrass plants overexpressing PvMYB4 for reduced biomass recalcitrance. BioEnergy Res 8:910–921Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jung JH, Vermerris W, Gallo M, Fedenko JR, Erickson JE, Altpeter F (2013) RNA interference suppression of lignin biosynthesis increases fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production from field-grown sugarcane. Plant Biotechnol J 11:709–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grabber JH, Ralph J, Lapierre C, Barrière Y (2004) Genetic and molecular basis of grass cell-wall degradability. I. Lignin–cell wall matrix interactions. C R Biol 327:455–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ralph J (2010) Hydroxycinnamates in lignification. Phytochem Rev 9:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lindsey K, Johnson A, Kim P, Jackson S, Labbé N (2013) Monitoring switchgrass composition to optimize harvesting periods for bioenergy and value-added products. Biomass Bioenergy 56:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA (2005) Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 28:515–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Adler PR, Ma S, Boateng AA, Weimer PJ, Jung HJG (2006) Biomass yield and biofuel quality of switchgrass harvested in fall or spring. Agron J 98:1518–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baxter HL, Stewart CN Jr (2013) Effects of altered lignin biosynthesis on phenylpropanoid metabolism and plant stress. Biofuels 4:635–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhao Q, Dixon RA (2014) Altering the cell wall and its impact on plant disease: from forage to bioenergy. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:69–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Uppalapati SR, Serba DD, Ishiga Y, Szabo LJ, Mittal S, Bhandari HS, Bouton JH, Mysore KS, Saha MC (2013) Characterization of the rust fungus, Puccinia emaculata, and evaluation of genetic variability for rust resistance in switchgrass populations. Bioenergy Res 6:458–468Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zale J, Freshour L, Agarwal S, Sorochan J, Ownley BH, Gwinn KD, Castlebury LA (2008) First report of rust on switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) caused by Puccinia emaculata in Tennessee. Plant Dis 92:1710Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holly L. Baxter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mitra Mazarei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chunxiang Fu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Qunkang Cheng
    • 4
  • Geoffrey B. Turner
    • 2
    • 5
  • Robert W. Sykes
    • 2
    • 5
  • Mark T. Windham
    • 4
  • Mark F. Davis
    • 2
    • 5
  • Richard A. Dixon
    • 2
    • 6
  • Zeng-Yu Wang
    • 2
    • 3
  • C. Neal StewartJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  3. 3.Samuel Roberts Noble FoundationArdmoreUSA
  4. 4.Department of Entomology and Plant PathologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  5. 5.National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoldenUSA
  6. 6.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations