Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic Parameters of Factors Affecting the Biomass Recalcitrance of Douglas Fir Trees

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although forestry residuals provide a potentially abundant source of biomass, Douglas fir is a particularly challenging feedstock to utilize in the biochemical conversion to fuels and value-added chemicals due to its high levels of biomass recalcitrance. A greater understanding of the underlying factors behind highly recalcitrant biomass is critical in overcoming this problem. Building on earlier efforts to establish a protocol and a “recalcitrance factor” for screening the recalcitrance of trees, this study attempts to provide the first look into the genetic factors behind recalcitrance in Douglas fir with the possibility of using selective breeding and tree improvement practices to reduce recalcitrance in future generations of our forest products. Samples from over 250 Douglas fir trees in a second-cycle progeny test were collected and subjected to screening. Samples were subjected to a dilute-acid pretreatment and a subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis procedure, ultimately measuring the raw wood density, pretreatment yield, the holocellulose content of pretreated samples, hydrolyzability, and recalcitrance factor. From these data, the heritability, genetic gains, and genetic correlations were estimated. Based on these results, we predict that modifying recalcitrance in tree improvement may be feasible, but would likely require some additional understanding and improved screening techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wyman CE (2007) What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol 25:153–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCann, M. C., and N. C. Carpita (2015) Biomass recalcitrance: a multi-scale, multi-factor, and conversion-specific property. Journal of Experimental Botany. 66:4109–4118

  3. Mabee WE, Gregg DJ, Arato C, Berlin A, Bura R, Gilkes N, Mirochnik O, Pan XJ, Pye EK, Saddler JN (2006) Updates on softwood-to-ethanol process development. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129:55–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Phitsuwan P, Sakka K, Ratanakhanokchai K (2013) Improvement of lignocellulosic biomassin planta: a review of feedstocks, biomass recalcitrance, and strategic manipulation of ideal plants designed for ethanol production and processability. Biomass Bioenergy 58:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007) Forest genetics. CAB International, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Howe GT, Jayawickrama K, Cherry M, Johnson GR, Wheeler NC (2006) Breeding Douglas-fir. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol. 27. Wiley-Blackwell, MA, USA, pp 245–353

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zobel, B. J., and J. P. Van Buijtenen (1989) Wood variation: its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  8. Bouton JH (2007) Molecular breeding of switchgrass for use as a biofuel crop. Curr Opin Genetics Dev 17:553–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Geleynse S, Alvarez-Vasco C, Garcia K, Jayawickrama K, Trappe M, Zhang X (2014) A multi-level analysis approach to measuring variations in biomass recalcitrance of Douglas fir tree samples. Bioenergy Res 7:1411–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ukrainetz NK, Kang KY, Aitken SN, Stoehr M, Mansfield SD (2008) Heritability and phenotypic and genetic correlations of coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) wood quality traits. Canadian J Forest Res-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 38:1536–1546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96:673–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wise LE, Murphy M, D’Addieco AA (1946) Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and on studies on the hemicelluloses. Paper Tr J 122:35–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Timell TE (1959) Isolation of holocellulose from Jack pine Pinus banksiana. Pulp Paper Mag Can 60:T26–T28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., and Thompson, R. 2009 ASReml User Guide Release 3.0 VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK www.vsni.co.uk

  15. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  16. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York

  17. Henderson CR (1984) Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zobel, B. J., and J. B. Jett (1995) Genetics of wood production. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  19. Foston M, Ragauskas AJ (2012) Biomass characterization: recent progress in understanding biomass recalcitrance. Ind Biotechnol 8:191–208

  20. Howe GT, Yu JB, Knaus B, Cronn R, Kolpak S, Dolan P, Lorenz WW, Dean JFD (2013) A SNP resource for Douglas-fir: de novo transcriptome assembly and SNP detection and validation. BMC Genomics 14:137–158

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study is provided through the Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance Project, supported by an Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant No. 2011-68005-30416 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. This study is also supported, in part, by National Science Foundation (award number 1067012). Permission provided by Plum Creek Timber Company and Campbell Global to access the test site and obtain samples is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao Zhang.

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 76 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geleynse, S., Jayawickrama, K., Trappe, M. et al. Genetic Parameters of Factors Affecting the Biomass Recalcitrance of Douglas Fir Trees. Bioenerg. Res. 9, 731–739 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9718-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9718-2

Keywords

Navigation